Echetlaeus
Hero of Marathon
I, Echetlaeus hereby declare that the individual called 'LeBrok' of this forum uses his power in an authoritarian way.
I have seen that he always has to say something negative about my threads. This is fine up to a degree, but I can see malicious thoughts behind it. What he actually does is to provide 'law and order' according to his points of view. That said, he does not tolerate others' opinions and he tries to mock them.
There are not a lot of people in this forum who are actually active. Those, well known individuals, seem to share many things in common with LeBrok and that is fine. But why Lebrok wants to have people who share only his thoughts in this forum? What about the others (for example myself) who have a different opinion?
This individual has punished me twice. I understand the first case and I accepted it. Yet he punished me another time for this statement:
(see more here (#15): http://www.eupedia.com/forum/thread...lands-for-native-people-in-America-and-Canada)
^ Oh, what a scholar, what a beacon of light!
Your excellency, lord moderator of this forum:
I follow the third law of Newton.
I have no warrior nature when there is no need for it, but I shall 'fight' you via dialogue until the end. I am sure that we do not have anything in common or at least many things in common. Let me not exaggerate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am criticizing you. Liberals tend to be very annoying sometimes.
Yes it is a Greek saying.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now to the point.
First of all I don't get it, why do you talk about gays so much?
Homosexuality in Ancient Greece may have been the case (we do not know for sure, do you? And if yes, how?), but until a certain age. Recall, the same was true in the Roman Empire as well.
All Spartans had kids, for it was a duty to society (actually this was the case for the whole Greece). They had to follow the laws of Lycurgus. Someone would have been mocked by the society should he had continued these practices afterwards.
I suggest you 'lift' a little bit more and then talk again.
How do you know that I am intolerant? Don't you understand that this person is thyself. You are the one who mocks all others with different opinion than yours. You are the one who uses his absolute power in this forum.
Reminder: I am not historian, nor anthropologist, like most people here are. I just study history for fun.
LeBrok has offended me numerous times, yet nothing was done about it. In fact this is his response for my second penalty:
Dear Echetlaeus,
You have received an infraction at Europe Forum.
Reason: Non respect of moderation warning
-------
Use Newtonian law here and you'll be banned quicker than you think. That's how you will learn finally what law works here.
-------
If Eupedia is only for people with a monochromatic point of view about certain aspects of life, let me know.
Thank you,
-E
I have seen that he always has to say something negative about my threads. This is fine up to a degree, but I can see malicious thoughts behind it. What he actually does is to provide 'law and order' according to his points of view. That said, he does not tolerate others' opinions and he tries to mock them.
There are not a lot of people in this forum who are actually active. Those, well known individuals, seem to share many things in common with LeBrok and that is fine. But why Lebrok wants to have people who share only his thoughts in this forum? What about the others (for example myself) who have a different opinion?
This individual has punished me twice. I understand the first case and I accepted it. Yet he punished me another time for this statement:
(see more here (#15): http://www.eupedia.com/forum/thread...lands-for-native-people-in-America-and-Canada)
^ Oh, what a scholar, what a beacon of light!
Your excellency, lord moderator of this forum:
I follow the third law of Newton.
I have no warrior nature when there is no need for it, but I shall 'fight' you via dialogue until the end. I am sure that we do not have anything in common or at least many things in common. Let me not exaggerate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am criticizing you. Liberals tend to be very annoying sometimes.
Yes it is a Greek saying.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now to the point.
First of all I don't get it, why do you talk about gays so much?
Homosexuality in Ancient Greece may have been the case (we do not know for sure, do you? And if yes, how?), but until a certain age. Recall, the same was true in the Roman Empire as well.
All Spartans had kids, for it was a duty to society (actually this was the case for the whole Greece). They had to follow the laws of Lycurgus. Someone would have been mocked by the society should he had continued these practices afterwards.
I suggest you 'lift' a little bit more and then talk again.
How do you know that I am intolerant? Don't you understand that this person is thyself. You are the one who mocks all others with different opinion than yours. You are the one who uses his absolute power in this forum.
Reminder: I am not historian, nor anthropologist, like most people here are. I just study history for fun.
LeBrok has offended me numerous times, yet nothing was done about it. In fact this is his response for my second penalty:
Dear Echetlaeus,
You have received an infraction at Europe Forum.
Reason: Non respect of moderation warning
-------
Use Newtonian law here and you'll be banned quicker than you think. That's how you will learn finally what law works here.
-------
If Eupedia is only for people with a monochromatic point of view about certain aspects of life, let me know.
Thank you,
-E