So obviously the more EEF and WHG the more Ancient European, the more ANE Yamna the later in Europe.
This might also correlate with my suppositions (from the start of this thread) that before ancient Greek inhabitants they were native inhabitants of the so called Pelazgian.
And it might mean that the only possible major group of Pelazgians are E-V13 (which i support) or !2e.
It makes sense because as per Albanians they have E-V13 (over 40%) and another Ie2 by 15% then we have over 65% (Which might mean EEF) which is pretty high percentage
Thats why i mentioned Early Neolithic through mid Neolithic (10,000 - 5,000 ybp) because through that period we have early Neolithic Farmers from south east Europe.
Now we are not talking here before 10,000 (please pay attention to wording)
Therefore, Albanians and Greeks are descend from south east Europe since the early Neolithic Period 10,000 years ago.
You mix grandmothers and frogs. And, of course, conclusions are wrong.
First
You mix EEF, ANE and WHG with uniparental markers E-V13, I2a, R1a etc.
Are you confused?
Conclusion: Wrong
Second
You speak about E1b
You speak about 69 samples but you can see: G2 = 41, I2a = 18.
How many E1b do you see?
E1b = 1
Where?
In Spain!
It didn't find in Balkans.
Confused?
Conclusion: Wrong
Third
You don't understand what is EEF.
And scientists can be imprecise, what makes confusion at you.
Because EEF (differently from WHG and ANE) is hybrid component:
EEF = ENF + WHG,
whereby ENF is much larger than WHG in EEF.
ENF: Early Neolithic Farmers
ENF is componet from Near East including Anatolia, Caucasus and near.
ENF is appropriate not EEF (and term EEF is not in use).
Confused?
Conclusion: Wrong
Fourth
And where you are confused you try to project on today's nations.
It is nonsense.
For example.
Can you imagine someone who is carrier of haplogroup E-V13, and he lived in Anatolia, or Causacus, or Near East, in XIX century, and with Turkish army he came to the Albania. (I don't generalize, only I give example).
And his descendants had Y-DNA testing.
The results are that they are E-V13 carriers.
Someone sees these results and thinks that they are 10000 years in the Balkans.
Confused?
Conclusion: Wrong
...
Plus: nations are result XIX and XX centuries, not 10000 before, and they are social constructions, not genetical.
...
Your conclusions that Albanians are 10000 years in the Balkans is completely wrong.
It is childish.
...
In the base we are in old debate. This paper (Lazaridis et al) changed nothing, and it was not its purpose.
It will be clearer when much more DNA samples be tested, from different epochs. Also it will be clearer when new discoveries in different science: history, archeology, linguistics, philology, anthropology etc. lead to new knowledge.