Someone in Anthrogenica posted these averages of Eurasia K11 CHG-NAF (GedrosiaDNA in GEDmatch):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-ObXiVfL-RzOEpDQ2U3MTJzNTA/view Compared to that autosomal map, they are a bit different.
Interesting looking at the fst tables.
Closest to CHG
1. Kalash 0.074
2. WHG 0.084
3. Neolithic Anatolian Farmers 0.087
4. South Indian 0.089
5. EHG 0.107
Closest to EHG
1. CHG 0.107
2. Kalash 0.112
3. WHG/South Indian 0.122
4. Anatolian Farmers 0.123
Closest to WHG
1. CHG 0.084
2. Kalash 0.101
3. South Indian 0.107
4. Anatolian Farmer 0.109
5. EHG 0.122
Closest to Kalash
1. CHG 0.074
2. South Indian 0.082
3. WHG 0.101
4. Anatolian Farmer 0.106
5.EHG 0.112
closest to South Indian
1. Kalash 0.082
2. East Asian 0.087
3. CHG 0.089
4. WHG 0.107
5. Anatolian Farmer 0.115
Closest to Anatolian Farmer
1. CHG 0.087
2. Kalash 0.106
3. WHG 0.109
4. East African 0.114
5. South Indian 0.115
Conclusions out of this?
CHG is literally the only component that shows significant closeness to any of the other major West Eurasian type components. It shares closest relation to Kalash, WHG, Anatolian Farmer and South Indian. It is also the only component that shows at least some closeness to EHG. Almost like the center of all.
EHG is literally not very close to any component beside some to CHG. It is even closer to Kalash than to WHG. And South Indian is equal close to it as is WHG!
expected or unexpected, WHG shows it's closest relation to CHG. Than followed by Kalash (everything that shows close relation to CHG seems to show also to Kalash), South Indian and Anatolian farmer. EHG again not very close and beside general West Eurasian affinities nothing to show close relationship.
Makes me wonder if some people were right with their theory that "ANE" is not a real component and just hiding some WHG like ancestry in South_Central Asians. So "South Indian" and "Kalash" might indeed hide some WHG like ancestry in it. We know that Anatolian farmers are halfway "WHG-UHG" like no suprise that they show affinities.
Kalash as expected very close to CHG, followed than by South Indian. My explanation for that is, Kalash represents slightly drifted version of CHG which settled in South_Central Asia, and a part of that new Kalash component moved into the Indian subcontinent and merged with the local H&G creating the "South Indian" component. And again opposite to what you would expect geographically, Kalash is closer to WHG as to EHG.
The South Indian component seems to be a hybrid of West and East Eurasian DNA (as we knew for long). It must be something "Proto Dravidian" + Something Proto Southeast Asian. This is why they score as second closest "East Asian". And again despite geographic closeness, even South Indian scores better with WHG than with EHG.
Anatolian Farmer scores best with CHG of course followed by the "CHG like" Kalash component. Than we have WHG next, most likely due to the WHG-UHG
like ancestry in them. After that comes East African which is quite easy to explain as we know from the recently tested ancient East African skeletons. The East African component is a hybrid of Levant farmers and pre Neolithic Africans.