MyTrueAncestry Mytrueancestry.com

[Duarte]

thanks - very useful comments here on these 'Illyrian' samples!

You’re welcome Olivand

 

[torzio]

I ran results from 3000BC until 1800BC and they are below .......................I was told only the samples connected with a red line is my "matches"

these results do not appear if you run this as the default setting

 

[Salento]

I ran results from 3000BC until 1800BC and they are below .......................I was told only the samples connected with a red line is my "matches"

these results do not appear if you run this as the default setting

… the yellow lines are your deep dive (cM) matches (your ancient relatives)!
the rest are just distance matches.

 

[torzio]

only change is closest ancient populations ..............samnites included for first time
Roman + Illyrian (4.887)
Gallo-Roman + Roman (6.367)
Gaul + Samnite (6.449)
Gaul + Roman (6.871)
Gallo-Roman + Illyrian (7.133)
Gallo-Roman (7.192)
Illyrian (8.808)
Roman (9.782)
Gaul (12.22)
Samnite (12.39)


and this below added to neolitihic age

20. Bronze Age Bulgaria
3000 BC - Genetic Distance: 11.17 - I2165

 

[torzio]

I2165, Bronze Age, 3020-2895 calBCE

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/05/09/135616
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/135616

I2165
mtDNA: T2f
Y-DNA: I2a2a1b1b

 

[Salento]

only change is closest ancient populations ..............samnites included for first time
Roman + Illyrian (4.887)
Gallo-Roman + Roman (6.367)
Gaul + Samnite (6.449)
Gaul + Roman (6.871)
Gallo-Roman + Illyrian (7.133)
Gallo-Roman (7.192)
Illyrian (8.808)
Roman (9.782)
Gaul (12.22)
Samnite (12.39)


and this below added to neolitihic age

20. Bronze Age Bulgaria
3000 BC - Genetic Distance: 11.17 - I2165

I’m close to a couple of Venosa / Samnite, they’re with the Iron-Age samples, but we know they’re from about 700 AD, I think they're close to some Foggia VK and Medieval Rs, and my top Medievals are all Italian

 

[torzio]

I’m close to a couple of Venosa / Samnite, they’re with the Iron-Age samples, but we know they’re from about 700 AD, I think they're close to some Foggia VK and Medieval Rs, and my top Medievals are all Italian

they only gave me one samnite match


32. Ancient Venosa Samnite
400 BC - Genetic Distance: 12.39 - VEN016
Top 99 % match vs all users

 

[Salento]

they only gave me one samnite match
32. Ancient Venosa Samnite
400 BC - Genetic Distance: 12.39 - VEN016
Top 99 % match vs all users

… VEN016 - third to last:
(if I add the Foggia VK, VEN016 becomes the last)

https://www.eupedia.com/forum/threa...c-time-transec?p=631943&viewfull=1#post631943

 

[matty74]

Mine seem to be all over the place. Classic northern euro hybrid

Viking + Celt (2.149)
Viking Danish + Vandal (3.46)
Celt + Saxon (3.622)
Celt + Vandal (3.737)
Viking + Saxon (3.995)
Celt (5.432)
Vandal (5.617)
Saxon (5.708)
Viking Danish (6.759)
Viking (7.302)

 

[matty74]

Neolithic Age

 

[matty74]

Early Bronze Age

 

[matty74]

Late Bronze Age

 

[matty74]

Iron Age

 

[matty74]

Roman Age

 

[matty74]

Dark Ages

 

[matty74]

Medieval Age

 

[matty74]

Early Modern Period

 

[Salento]

IA timelapse x2 maps:

Latins, Sanniti, Etruria:

Romans

 

[Salento]

 

[mongrel]

Why are all (but one) my DNA samples and Deep Dive results given as being R1b1a.... but I'm a confirmed E1b1b1a1b1a? The only example that MTA can provide that actually matches is "Late Medieval Cancelleria Basilica"

I would have expected there to have been no matches if the haplogroups don't match.? Maybe genetics works differently?

Or are MTA just padding out the results to make it look like I'm actually getting something after paying my money?