Recent content by broder

Interesting, sample I8252 is of low coverage but he does seem to be positive for the L618 node. He has one good read at CTS6598

Is the raw data available? FTDNA is getting careless too. For example they have the Ravna I15552 sample under Z2110 (FTA27460). But he is negative upstream at the CTS699 node (BY221375-).

Garibaldi looks like is somewhere under FGC11457 too, perhaps even FGC11450. The only thing suspicious is their 442.

He is just a parallel branch to Y32147 under Y125049. There are six other branches parallel to Y125049 under BY38894 that are predominantly Albanian, besides BY199059. The other two parallel branches to BY38894 under Z2705 are BY147912 and YF121449 (apparently from Mirdite/Mat area). So, over...

That 45% mark is not accurate but not that far off either considering vast majority of Kosova Serbs are with origin from the tribal region of Montenegro (Brda) - implanted there by the Serbian kingdom after WW1. One can simply look at the serbian project and see that such families belong to...

One at FTDNA and the other one at YSEQ. I said Albanians. There are hundreds of other samples that you don’t see.

There are Albanians under PH1173. At least I know of two samples, one from Tirane and one from Elbasan (so central Albania). As for these samples, I only looked at the Z2103 ones thus far, more specifically I15551, I15552 and I15515, and man they are low quality. I15552 that was classified as...

Right, back at it again. Like bots.

Dude, your theories are even more incoherent. You started with Urnfield and Central Europe back in the day. Littering every thread. I don’t know what you are claiming now because I don’t read your walls of text anymore. Still, no need to cus or disrespect you because I disagree with you..

I honestly don’t get why some of you get so emotional with Bruzmi and personalize these sort of topics. Overall from my observation, all he has been saying during his debates with Riverman, and was able to demonstrate through his autosomal models, that V13 is more of a Balkan thing rather than...

As far as I am concerned that sample is useless. I want to keep it simple: Z2103 - yellow L51 - blue PF7563 - green M269 that couldn't be read any further - red

He was radiocarbon dated, so the date should be accurate. However, he is a super low quality sample so probably that’s why it behaves oddly. I don’t think samples of that quality should be used for autosomal analysis. I was even thinking of removing it from that map because he only has one call...

Relax bro. Don’t forget the Cinamak CTS1450 sample that’s BY251- There is some crazy Z2103 diversity from what we are seeing Here where I keep track of all the M269 in the Balkans: https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1BLhnG7WM2MBceCLPba-4d2wlcJyNcHw

May be unrelated but there is already an Iron Age R1b-M269 (xZ2105) sample from Argolis, TIR008.

They are just guessing, and are jumping to conclusions prematurely me thinks. Noticed their flawed conclusion about the Y30588 for those families in Drenice? Playing the politically correct game so they cover their ass if there is any backlash. By doing so, they also are disregarding the family...