Search results

I think not much G2a, instead they had some pre-Illyrian R1a from Pelasgians.... research shows that R1a is ancient old in the area.... we can assume that several waves of R1a did contribute to observed extreme diversity, but still the diversity much larger than elsewhere is likely to point out...

no offense but there is no data for such conclusions... thracian words we know were recorded in greek which gives them greek look and feel but that doesnot mean they were originally similar to greek words in any way... there are 23 words in total that are recorded as thracian words... the rest...

i am focused on Walach/Vlah... in south east and central europe (Greece, ex-Yugoslavia, Albania, Slovakia) it is about local speakers of language derived from latin... russian primary chronicle refer to Roman empire as Vlakhs... can you elaborate the reasoning that claims that in Germanic...

exactly. Vlach is not about origin from single tribe. it is about many different unrelated people who were at some point in time converted to citizens of Roman empire...

letopis in Serbia, ljetopis is more what people in Montenegro or Croatia or Bosnia would say... its a coin word leto = summer/year (year is more arhaic meaning) pisati = to write it literrary means "writing (down) years" = chronicle it is Slavic word.... perhaps it was used in medival...

i will not ask how can you suppose numbers..... numbers can be predicted in an educated guess when one compares something with related cases or prehistory, but you are making a wild guess without any reasoning... those are not new results.... they are from year 2006...

well, only source that talks about arrival of Serbs to Balkan is De administrando imperio, and it states that they have arrived from Boiki (Bavaria/Bohemia) where they have also originally dwellt.. this fits well with I2a -Din south spread among south slavs and to some extent in Germany, but not...

i was actually referring to: 1) old reference about low diversity of I2a-Din in Moldavia 2) Verenich's analysis with a map that according to my memory did show hotspots of diversity to be: Ukraine, Serbia and Czech republic... as far as i remember he has also pinpointed that Serbs have...

diversity is not the same as frequency... actually, from what i have read (not much data yet about diversity of I2a-din in official publications) Moldavians have lowest diversity and Croats relatively low diversity...biggest diversity is in part of Ukraine in Czech republic and Serbia.. Bosnia...

well, what about mass killing of native Americans or giving them blankets infected with heavy diseases, or about ghettos for Japanese during WW2, or throwing atomic bombs on Japan even though the was close to an end without it, or about black people being slaves for centuries and low worth caste...

i think that most of real thinking is visual thinking + causal logic... because real thinking is about making a model of reality and figuring out how it works and why one cannot set a skeleton of a model from words, words one can only use to express/communicate key concepts, causal connections...

your last name is likely to correlate with set of people related to you tribal name is last name of the nation.... it sometimes passes on even when language and culture change... theory that i propose links spread of tribal names and quotes from history sources, with genetic findings... it is...

I am sure, I speak of FYR Macedonia Albanians .. there were tests done in Macedonia.... south Albania is different story it was heavily settled by Slavs, plenty of Slavic place names there, it was conquered for long time by Bulgarians (in times when they were also holding Macedonia) Macedonia...

that makes sense.... Romanians cluster typically close to south Slavs in genetic research... Dacians were related to wolf same as Lycians and Serbs... Carpathians with name likely related to Dacian tribe Carpi were also known as montes Serrorum - mountains of Serians... Carpathians were also...

exactly it is not R1a that really distinguishes south Slavs from people around them, but I2a-din... look at this work from Macedonia comparing Albanians and FYR Macedonians http://www.bjmg.edu.mk/UploadedImages/pdf/11-18.pdf the two R1a more or less the same and in the level close to the one...

its realistic scenario.... though i still stick to Serians story.....as it fits well with spread of I2a2-Din in both Asia and Europe especially around Danube.... according to "De administrando imperio" Serbs come to Balkan from land Boiki where they have also originally dwellt and where they...

actually, haplogroups E and J are creators of most big civilizations in ancient times... from ancient Egypt via all middle east ancient civilizations, through ancient Greece (which has by far most contributed to modern civilization), and even initial core of Roman empire was dominantly E+ J...

that is hard to estimate from this data. whether contribution of Goths to R1b-u106 in Spain is a single digit or around 30% or 50% or most of it is hard to tell. Take into account that Goths were last settlement wave in Spain, that they have massively settled the area, and that their impact...

i think you are partially right there. The people who settled empty areas like Lika, Kordun and parts of Slavonia were mixture of Serbs and Vlachs and not Vlachs only. Hence, increased E-V13. But big Vlach admixture holds for most of Serb settled areas except for Herzegovina where also in Serb...

i don't think it was comparable level. Otherwise, we would see much more of R1a and I1 in lands that were eventually settled by Goths (north Italy, south France and especially Spain). I say that Goths brought some, not all, of R1b-L11 in Spain. But enough to make a difference between role of...