First of all, your info is wrong. I don't understand: you have been here for about a year and you still throw made up statements about statistics. All you need is Google and 3-4 clicks to get this.
According to Eupedia:
Croatia has 37% I2a1 and 24% R1a. The ratio is 37/24=1.54
Bosnia &...
It still a bit early to draw conclusions on this, but, so far, Y-DNA results actually indicate that the Slavic portion if ancestry in Tosks arrived mainly from Bulgaria and Macedonia, not Yugoslavia. Historical data is in agreement with this.
Yes, but without a full autosomal record of all the populations that have existed in the surrounding region from the time in question until today, it is impossible to confidently determine which populations contributed and when. The data is still thin and there are several competing theories...
All I said is PCA proximity cannot necessarily shared ancestry, which is true. I did not oppose or back any views on the relationship between Ashkenazi Jews and South Europeans. However, making historical inferences from autosomal similarity is also very problematic and the authors actually...
Being on the same spot in PCA doesn't mean shared ancestry. One can be half-French and half-Iranian and be close to Greeks on PCA, which does not mean Greek ancestry.
Don't take this study too seriously. There are no new samples and most populations it deals with are only represented by unjustified proxies (for example, they use modern Croatians to represent Medieval Slavs). Most importantly, their only method of comparison is PCA, which is very unreliable...
The Neanderthal & Denisovan samples we have are still very few. It is possible that they have only captured a fraction of genomic diveristy within and between these species.
While we are waiting on some new data, here are the PCAs from the paper that compared Griko speakers from Puglia and Sicily with Italians, Albanians and Greeks of different regions.
Btw, the continental Greek samples from that leaked image which was posted in another thread might actually come...
Nothing unexpected from a comparison that leaves out all the rest of the Balkans. Of course Greeks are similar to Sicilians on a European level.
In any case, we should wait for the Italy paper since they seem to have all the answers, if the leaks are true.
There are three samples being widely used already. One is all from Thessaloniki, the other from Crete and there is a third sample which is from a data bank and cannot be traced to any particular region afaik, so it could be from different regions. Now, if see the PCA below, you will notice that...
You mean the Lazaridis paper here: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature23310? Where does it say that? Can you provide a quote that can be found on the paper?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.