Search results

No, it is likely, doesn't have to be Greeks, but a EEF source. The same way it happened to Iberia, almost completely replaced by Yamnaya R1b, yet largely EEF in admixture. North Albanians have less Near Eastern admixture than South Albanians. It goes like a gradual line, increasing the more...

Romanian map covering as late as 3rd-4th century AD, shows non-Romanized Albanians(Illyrians) very far north still.

What makes you think samples from Albania proper within the same timeframe wouldnt plot more similarily to modern Albanians? Seems like proto-Albanians were more north-western shifted and gradually mixed with Greek women more or less. It's no surprise here, we border the Greeks for several...

Not likely - unless we have access to ancient remains to prove this claim!

Exactly the word we use for blade/knife.

.................?

Serbia stole this historical battle from us, who were really there fighting it! Vuk Karaziz, the biggest thief of history with the creation of modern Serbia.

Not sure, but the oldest TMRCA of the living I1 members is ~3100 years iirc according to yFull.

Spot on man!

This is why there can never be a purely objective geneticist.

This map is truly interesting. Romanian author of it, shows the pre-Slavic Balkan:

Lmao, me: Most Tuscans themselves plot outside the center, at Albanians aswell.

Lmao, me:

Correct. And the notorious letter from our mighty, celebrated Lord Skanderbeg to Prince of Taranto:

Albanians are close to Tuscans, not South Italians. South Italians are closer to islander Greeks. You need a psychiatrist, like the other poster mentioned to you. Welcome to my ignore list.

But you're only 1/8 Serb, with extreme Serbian radical views, that's the problem.

You live in Britain according to flag, are 1/8 Serbian and arguably one of the biggest radical Serbo-nationalists.

Albania shows no sample size, here is the actual percentages of Ghegs and Tosks combined, with a sample size of 209: Ghegs themselves would have as little as 1-3% R1a+I2a-CTS10228