Search results

Actually Romans really were doing it like Europeans in Africa as mentioned earlier on this thread. So how much truth there is behind that is doubtful, and Illyrian?? what is Illyrian first?? who were they?? can you just by fingertipping assigning them to different people...For me REAL pure...

Sile I know I should thanks for the motivation but I am afraid of creating a thread, lol dont know why I just leave it for now :)

I didnt say the texts are slavic, Seems like you didnt read my text, i qoute myself:'' i have seen texts of dalmatia of the 16th century most is latin. if it has anything to do with ancient dalmatian or not thats another question which we cant know for sure cuz there are no ancient texts...

Sile you're making a mistake aswell, dont mix up texts of dalmatians of the 16th century with ancient dalmatians, because those of the 16th century were slavicized, romanized, and maybe earlier even celtizized already. i have seen texts of dalmatia of the 16th century most is latin. if it has...

Thanks LeBrok thats some of the questions I had too

paternal genetic lineage shown by Y chromosome is only 1/46th of genetic make up. So, I dont know if its good to built up history based on only YDna. MtDna test according to wikipedia: Computing the frequency of common point mutations of the present-day European population with the Thracian...

Judging based on dna italy is a mixed of fruit with a cherry on top

says the slav who came 600 ad in balkans? If you call greeks as people from ancient according to dna you automatically have, yes you have to call albanians at least as ancient only according to Dna, because similarity is frightening Dude. because this is just a forum nothing which you say is...

Calling albanians africans cause of E-v13 is dangerous considering e-v13 in italy greece montenegro macedonia albania kosovo bulgaria romania.. With quiet high percentages in those countries. yes albanians dont call themselves like that woow nice observation Shqip (1st hypothesis speak clearly...

Sile's theory seems logical, Similar names etc., Could there be a misinterpretation, cause Lydia Lybia is very similar too?

Thanks ike fully agree with you, i quote ike:" It's one thing to agree or disagree with someones posts, but it's not the reason to give someone a negative or positive rating. Negative rating is supposed to reflect the quality of someone's post and pinpoint ******, abusers, etc, not the number of...

I refer you to the i2a-din thread, link below, there you see some possible conclusions about this http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/26903-How-did-I2a-Din-get-to-the-Balkans

I dont know who is rating me negative, but please stop, only because of not agreeing with me, or not sharing my opinion isnt a reason to rate me negative, I also use the rating system but only for positive rating when I like a post or when it seems plausibel to a certain degree like i just...

adamo, Tell me when you write the book about it =) and sile when you reply be sure you read my post and understood my post, and not do cherry picking words. my created (is connected with the brackets MENTIONED by greeks) Scodra was the capital of Illyrians, and it is in todays albania Shkodra...

Okay, guys this is just a forum so everything we say are hypotheses, nothing can be certainly known, the only thing we have of illyrians is some names and tribes and some gods of them, and they fit with albanian at least some of them, on the basis of this I was argueing, most scholars certainly...

There is one thing for sure that albanian is a paleo balkan language which is supported by most linguists,would be thraco-dacian or thraco-illyrian. or you want to say that thracs dacs or illyrian spoke slavic, and if r1a/i2a was there then what were slavs? J2 or e-v13? Lol you gotta be kidding...

Yes and thats very positive, because i2a and r1a most of it came with slavs, if you look at i2a and r1a distribution most of it is in slavic countries, and there is a thread of i2a specific where you can see that the theory is widely accepted that i2a/r1a was a slavic mixture becuase i2a ukraine...

Because i2a is a also a large slavic branch dont forget that...ukraine 20%, belarus 17%, every slavic nation has i2a... More or less and dont tell me that ukraine or belarus are illyrians to this high degree, you can read on i2a haplogroup on eupedia.com that i2a also came with slavic invasion.

there is one point, Albanians (which live in south serbia, south and south-east montenegro, west macedonia, northwest greece and south greece(arvanits), west macedonia, kosovo and albania and also arberesh in italy) could keep some very old traditions which is good. The branch of E, especially...

As mihaitzateo already mentioned, with climate change also look may change a little, and also different invasions might have blurried the way real illyrians looked. but i would point also the picture of the book of john wilkes, i like that because i look alike :)