Search results

This is mine comparison to SZ1:Salento, we do not share the same segments of SZ1. MTA is than calculating different ancestry for certain segment graphic representation. There is still big difference between 187 cM and 13 cM.

I don’t trust "MyThrueAncestry" anymore. It can be used for “Brain storming” input only. It is not possible that somebody has matched a 1000-year-old individual on the same level as a modern kindred person. To different users they provide for the same segment of certain chromosomes the totally...

These are my results from MTA Deep dive ordered regarding cM value: Avar Szolad Hungary 1000 BC? SZ1Genetic Distance: 20.06 mtDNA: J1b Y-DNA: R1a1a1b2a2a (Z2125) Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 100) 14 SNP chains (min. 60 SNPs) / 187.57 cM...

Yes, L is present in small percentages in central Europe. There are several sources for this spread. - Commercial traffic routes - Settling of veterans of Roman military units. - Migration of Alans, Sarmatians and Scythians. - and ?

My origins in MT DNA. Obviously there is a problem with luck of data.

My origins on FT DNA.

Are you on FT DNA ?

Yes, I agree again. There is also the possibility that part of the population rested in place and was later mixed with incomers. But if I understand well, you agree that we both have a considerable amount of the same main population source from 3000 years ago. Regarding the question in #3308...

In #3308 I compared the same parts of chromosomes in the sample SZ1 for Salento and me. I expected to find a match for some of our ancient ancestors, but this is not the case. Can somebody explain what could be the reason? Thanks in advance.

[... assuming that SZ1 is from the Bronze Age, it has the base DNA ingredients and therefore the ancestry for many Europeans.] Salento, Right, but let me think. Every such sample has population areas where his genes are diluted in greater abundance than in the others. We may say that modern...

[... with Ancient samples, SNPs number and cMs don’t determine Genetic Distance at all!] Dear Salento, You have haplogroup T and mine is L. One of my ancestors (L) most probably(?) arrived from Syria around 30 AD as an archer in the Roman auxiliary unit transferred to Upper Germania province...

Jovalis, Thanks a lot. Kind regards to all.

[For those who have interest in analyzing, see the link to paper (PDF format) and it’s attached figures: biorxiv.org/content/bior...68250.full.pdf ] Sorry Duarte. I know this paper, but it is not providing answers to my questions. Maybe this is not the right place to discuss them. Anyway...

Studying the SZ1 sample I encounter some challenges: 1. If I am not wrong: The older the known ancestor would be, more fragmented pieces would be spread in the living population. In the case of SZ1 in a lot of people (including mine) we have large chunks of DNA all together in the range...

SZ1 has no Noth European ancestry(?) I entered SZ1 as a kit and found these relations: 1. Central Roman 590 AD - Genetic Distance: 7.846 - SZ36 2. Central Roman 590 AD - Genetic Distance: 8.78 - SZ43 3. Central Roman 630 AD - Genetic Distance: 9.373 - CL36 ? 4. Protovillanovia...

Many thanks!

HI, to everybody, great discussion here! I checked with MyThrueAncestry regarding the change from “Bronze Age Szolad Hungary 1000 BC" to "Avar Szolad Hungary 700 AD". They directed me to page "indo-european.eu/2020/10/longobards-from-scandinavia-and-the-ural-altaic-arpad-lineage". There Carlos...