Spaniards are not Celts. They are mostly arabs, they were invaded by arabs and moors
You mean like this, which is well known to have happened to the other "Celts" you want to suck up to so desperately, thanks to the late Roman multi-ethnic armies that conquered Britain, clueless "Latino":
"The Notitia Imperii shows us that bodies of
Syrians, Cilicians, Spaniards,
Moors, Thracians, Dalmatians, Frisians, &c., formed the military colonists of the stations in
Britain; and when even the emperors themselves were often not of Italian birth, and the most trusted officers and governors provincials or even barbarians, we have no reason to suppose that any notable proportion of genuine Roman blood found its way to this country..." - John Beddoe, "The Races of Britain", page 31.
"We find Thracians at Maglona (Machynlleth) and Moors at Aballaba (Appleby); elsewhere Batavians, Dalmatians, Spaniards, and even Syrian and Taifalic cavalry..." - Robert Owen, "The Kymry: their origin, history, and international relations", page 68.
"We know that there was no homogenous body of soldiery in Britain.The legions contained Syrians, Cilicians, Spaniards, Moors, Thracians, Dalmatians, Frisians, etc., and this fact seems to be a clear proof of the growing paucity of Roman citizens in Italy and the provinces." - Charles McLean Andrews, "The old English manor: a study in English economic history", page 35.
"In
Britain there were stationed troops from Belgium, Gaul, Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Bavaria, Dacia, Macedonia,
Cilicia, and Thrace; cohorts of boatmen from the
Tigris, the Danube and the
Euphrates; Syrians, Dalmatians,
Arabs, and Moors from the North of Africa." - James Charles Wall, "The first Christians of Britain", page 17.
"
Syrian elements have been recorded in Roman army camps in Europe,
particularly along the Danube frontier, where the
Syrian cults of Aziz, Hadad and al-Uzza are known.
On the British frontier, shrines to the
Syrian Jupiter Dolichenus have been found at Caerleon, and shrines to
Phoenician Astarte and Melqart have been found at Corbridge and Jupiter Heliopolitanus at Magnae, both
near Hadrian's Wall. Near the end of the wall, at South Shields, a Palmyrene funerary memorial has been found associated with the
Syrian community in Northumberland (plate 147). The ancient name of the South Shields fort was Arbeia,
a corruption of 'Arabs' (Plate 148), and the control of the river traffic
at the mouth of the Tyne at that time was in the hands
of an Arab community known as the 'Tigris boatmen'." - Warwick Ball, "Rome in the East: the transformation of an empire", page 398.
"Collingwood's purpose is to ramify and complicate the folk- history out all recognition, and in doing so to acknowledge the necessary truth in the heresy (never more shocking than to twenty- first-century ears) that imperialism is everywhere and inevitable in history and that the Roman incursion at least brought many and (as they say)
multicultural benefits to the varied Celtic tribes living in Britain when the soldiers of empire, recruited from Gaul, Spain, Tuscany, Lombardy,
Syria, North Africa, arrived to put in train the efficient work of colonisation." - Fred Inglis, "History man: the life of R. G. Collingwood", Princeton University Press, 2009. Page 148.
"At the same time, Rome offered extraordinary opportunities for upward mobility, even to distant regions. One remarkable story of this kind is told by an inscription found in the tiny North African town of Tiddis (now in Algeria), describing the life of the second or third
son of a local Berber landowner. This boy, who became known as
Quintus Lollius Urbicus, left North Africa for Asia, Judea, the Danube, and the lower Rhine, rising steadily through the imperial ranks.
Eventually he became governor of Britain, where he led imperial troops into Scotland, expanding the empire's borders." - Amy Chua, "Day of Empire: How Hyperpowers Rise to Global Dominance--and Why They Fall", pp. 40-41
"An altar inscription tells us that one of these
Moorish units, the
numerus Maurorum Aurelianorum,
was in Britain from the third to the fourth century AD. They were based at the fort of Aballava (Burgh-by-Sands) at the western end of Hadrian's Wall, and were probably brought over by the Emperor Septimius Severus (reigned AD 193-211),
himself a North African."
http://www.britishmuseum.org/explor...ects/pe/b/bronze_figurine_of_a_moorish_c.aspx
"Soldiers from distant provinces were not recruited directly, but arrived as transfers resulting from troop-movements in times of crisis. Two main episodes can be recognised in Britain: in c ad 149/150,
north Africans were probably brought back with British units returning from Antoninus Pius’ Mauretanian war,
and are evidenced on the Antonine Wall, and at Chester, Holt, and Bowness-on-Solway. These are the men who were probably formed into the Burgh-by-Sands unit. In 208, the Emperor Severus brought detachments from
the north African legion, III Augusta, for his campaigns in northern Britain (evidenced massively at York, and also at Caerleon, Hadrian’s Wall, in Scotland and the north; men who returned are epigraphically attested in north Africa)."
http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba78/letters.shtml
Gee, I always thought that the reason why the majority of Brits are not "Nordics" (like the Scandinavians are), or red-heads and blonds (like you stupidly think they are), was because they have a strong native pre-Indo-European component (as most British anthropologists and ethnologists themselves acknowledged since way back in the 19th century), but now following your retarded "logic" that a foreign invading minority from historical times somehow turns most of the natives into the same people as these invaders it seems clear to me that lots of Britons must really be "Arabs", "Moors" and "Anatolians",
Get a clue, clown.
