Unfortunately such a way to get some results that is, their presentation is entering into anarchy. No one doubts to your or someone else good faith but every portal, private person, association, etc can have their own results and for this situation in Croatia we would say
"we do not know here who drinks who pays".
That's my opinion.
The solution is to somehow encourage responsible officials in our countries to start doing large-scale genetic research on as many persons and as many markers as possible and with the rules of the profession. I think that we in Croatia do not have a couple of archaeogenetic data and all this shows that nothing is being done here but solution in my opinion should not be private research because there is always doubt.
You're entitled to your opinion. I disagree though. What you're proposing is on par with government level interference. Especially with DNA related research, thst is some hefty grounds for extreme corruption.
Such a large scale operation requires government funding. If you think governments are not prone to manipulation and even worse forms of corruption I don't know what to say.
What's needed is wealthy sponsors who can cover huge amounts of tests with no expectation of where they should be directed.
However, thinking that there's some grand agenda to over represent some regions above others is foolish.
Theres a long list of factors that go into this effort that people ignore. Some political, some personal.
It took a year or so to test only 8 samples for one specific region I had my eye on due to hesitancy and lack of trust among the people and even for political reasons. Whereas some villages or cities, gathering tests is less cumbersome. Some people don't trust DNA tests for whatever reason.
No one, especially the admins are getting a paycheck for all their efforts. Having to source collectors, and then having these collectors go out of their way on their free time to try and find people to agree to test is not easy. Especially in remote regions or places that have been abandoned.
Fund application is limited to those who can donate. Having one region over tested is better than having no funds to test anyone at all. They don't get to pick and choose what to do with a donors money unless said donor has no preference.
Often times they will even gather kits without a sponsor that sit around until someone pays for them. I have tried to help here too.
Ultimately, people who sponsor large amounts of kits are going to direct those contributions where they see fit. Unless they're super wealthy and can spread them out without preference.
Many people who have tested themselves can donate random kits to undersampled areas without a particular preference if they choose. They don't though.
So, people who have never participated in the project or arent going into their own wallet to do so, are in no position to say what should or shouldn't be done with this money.
If they are so concerned, they can gather funds for a couple samples a month instead of wasting it on bs like take out, and other senseless pleasures.
If they can't do this, they should at least refrain from complaining and trying to tell others what to do with their hard earned money.
Results are public any way. One can review project results and work out the math and see which areas need more samples and then donate towards that end if they really care.
Instead people will just complain and expect others to satisfy their desires for them. If the average project participate donated 1-2 kits a month towards this goal, that would be great.
If they can't or refuse to even when able, they don't get to tell others where their money should go.