Oh, thank you Angela and LeBrok!
This is great news, a 100% genetic hunter, who was a cultural farmer!
Do you remember our discussion about hunter-derived DNA in agricultural societies, from this thread?:
http://www.eupedia.com/forum/thread...thic-Early-Iron-Age-Y-DNA-landscape-of-Europe
In that thread we argued whether one could become a farmer without being admixed by farmer DNA first.
We argued about the sequence of events, chronology - whether pure hunters were first assimilated by farmer communities, learned how to farm - and only then, in next generations, they mixed with farmers; or whether they were first "raped" and only their genetically mixed offspring could learn how to farm.
You claimed that all farmers found up to that point (when we discussed) - even if they had hunter Y-DNA or mtDNA - were autosomally not "pure" HG, but farmer admixed.
I replied, that the reason for this was because finding a pure hunter in a farming community would be like finding a needle in a haystack, because they were going to be pure only during first few generations (at best), while their offspring in next generations had to be farmer-admixed due to intermarriages.
Apparently they have just found a needle in a haystack, and it kind of confirms my point of view, you must admit.
Koros 1 (KO1) in the scatter plot that you've posted above, was a pure hunter, 100% WHG.
Yet, his occupation was clearly a farmer. So he learned how to farm thanks to a purely cultural transition.
He was a hunter culturally assimilated by a farmer community. A needle in a haystack that I mentioned.
Only later, his descendants acquired EEF genes, since they mated with their EEF neighbours.