should we now talk about the Brak period instead of Uruk period ?
Uruk still was the center of that period
but there was already a city up north before the Uruk expansion
it makes the nature of this expansion look different
I have no idea why anyone would think Brak was "northern", and certainly not Uruk, or Jericho.
Even Kura Araxes is the Southern Caucasus.
Catalhuyuk is in the Northern part of the Middle East. And Brak is too.
It's very obvious to many that civilization has northern origins.
And these remains are the proof.
Don't be ironic, you don't remember the Early European Farmers, that cluster with Europeans?Very interesting. You've now taught me that people who are a combination of Iran Neo and Anatolia Neolithic are "northern" genetically.
So grateful. I learn something new every day.
Are we totally ignoring the Far East and Southeast Asia? I don't know, I'm asking.
When these great cities began to be built, the steppe people were still living in yurts
Many of them were living on wagons, Herodotus even mentioned the Ἁμαξόβιοι which literally means "wagon-dwellers".
Ulan-IV-kurgan-4-grave-15 is a very old wagon burial (we have an aDNA sample from the person buried there, SA6004). Some of the oldest evidence of wheeled wagons is from the steppe, north of Caucasus - probably that's where wheeled wagons were first invented.
So the most distant ancestor of my Audi A3 was probably produced in Eastern Europe.