It would be, and perhaps in reality it is, tragic that Greek scholars and academics are withholding DNA, precisely for reasons akin to all the vitriol with the Italian papers in the last couple of years... (local italics melted, NE shift, Balkans...) As in not so much due to scientific reason, as scientifically, paper after paper confirms such phenomena, but due to optics, and how such research papers would be used in the propaganda and news outlets in the Balkans (que the trash tier Balkan insider "Austrian researchers leave Albanians lost for words *pukes*).
But if this is indeed the reasoning why samples analyzed since 2015, that is 6 years already, are not published, they will come around.
I for one really do not buy the, we don't have samples, not enough high quality bones, we don't have funding some members here have put forward in the past when I raise such concerns. If Albania, which is much poorer, can find high enough quality samples in two BA sites, don't kid me or yourselves, Greece most certainly can.
I mean, who here honestly believes they have not analyzed the "alleged" Philip bones? Cause I do not. And I am sure they have analyzed far more than that.
PS: Ralphine I gave you an upvote, not because I have an opinion one way or the other, but because you were the only member to take my question seriously. As in the past when its about throwing ad hominems at Davidski everyone jumped in, but when a scientific paper uses and its authors use his blog I hear crickets.
I really doubt something like Fellmayer can be true. As despite the shift, there still seems to be continuity in YDNA and despite the shift autosomally modern Greeks, despite the very lazy model by the authors, are no outliers from other Balkan peoples. Basic logic.