Well, I think, you should check your sources again. I didn't read everything what you wrote but the part above struck my eyes. You have a problem of time if you try to connect Critias to Aztec temples. The one is 5th century BC, the other 2nd millennium AD.EdZiomek said:22. Critias speaks of 10 double-temples
Atzacoalco, or Atlacoalco
Huitznahuac this temple is depicted with two aspects, of a single temple structure. Is this the missing 10th double temple? (still studying this one)
This thread has been viewed 9667 times.