zanipolo
Banned
- Messages
- 2,071
- Reaction score
- 65
- Points
- 0
- Ethnic group
- Down Under
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- T1a2 - Z19945
- mtDNA haplogroup
- K1a4o
4. Conclusion
By analyzing critically the arguments proposed for the classification of Northern Adriatic Venetic,
this study has reached the conclusion about its significant Celticity. The basis for this
statement is provided by the morphological inventory and the functional distribution of the
morphological elements. As to the phonology, areal phenomena have been observed in the
similarities between Northern Adriatic Venetic and the neighbouring Italic. This confirms the
increasing awareness among Celtic specialists (e.g. Sims-Williams 2007) that the classificatory
parameters for Celticity are not as clear-cut as traditionally assumed. Our analysis has reached
exactly this conclusion concerning areal phenomena shared between Venetic and Italic with the
result that Northern Adriatic Venetic occupies an intermediate position on the traditional classificatory
parameters, but belongs to the Celtic type on the basis of the phonological patterning
(including lenition in the consonant system based on the tense vs, lax opposition). This fact, combined
with morphology which can be identified as Celtic, leads to the conclusion that Northern
Adriatic Venetic was a variety of Celtic which was subject to areal common developments with
Italic in the phonology and the lexicon, but remained entirely Celtic in the grammar.
On the linguistic classification of Venetic
45
The present investigation of East European Venetic has shown that its conjectured phonological
type fits the phonological type of both Northern Adriatic Venetic and — even more
so — of Vannetais as a surviving variety of Armorican Venetic. The Armorican Vannetais,
originally surrounded by Celtic, has never raised any doubt about its Celticity. The fundamental
similarity of Northern Adriatic Venetic, the conjectured East European Venetic and of
Vannetais on the level of the phonological type, and the specific similarity of both of the latter
varieties in the realm of palatalization combined with asymmetrical lenition, enable the conclusion
that these were genetically related varieties of Venetic within the realm of Celtic that
later became differentiated due to areal phenomena.
http://www.jolr.ru/files/(83)jlr2012-7(33-46).pdf
year 2012 investigation
By analyzing critically the arguments proposed for the classification of Northern Adriatic Venetic,
this study has reached the conclusion about its significant Celticity. The basis for this
statement is provided by the morphological inventory and the functional distribution of the
morphological elements. As to the phonology, areal phenomena have been observed in the
similarities between Northern Adriatic Venetic and the neighbouring Italic. This confirms the
increasing awareness among Celtic specialists (e.g. Sims-Williams 2007) that the classificatory
parameters for Celticity are not as clear-cut as traditionally assumed. Our analysis has reached
exactly this conclusion concerning areal phenomena shared between Venetic and Italic with the
result that Northern Adriatic Venetic occupies an intermediate position on the traditional classificatory
parameters, but belongs to the Celtic type on the basis of the phonological patterning
(including lenition in the consonant system based on the tense vs, lax opposition). This fact, combined
with morphology which can be identified as Celtic, leads to the conclusion that Northern
Adriatic Venetic was a variety of Celtic which was subject to areal common developments with
Italic in the phonology and the lexicon, but remained entirely Celtic in the grammar.
On the linguistic classification of Venetic
45
The present investigation of East European Venetic has shown that its conjectured phonological
type fits the phonological type of both Northern Adriatic Venetic and — even more
so — of Vannetais as a surviving variety of Armorican Venetic. The Armorican Vannetais,
originally surrounded by Celtic, has never raised any doubt about its Celticity. The fundamental
similarity of Northern Adriatic Venetic, the conjectured East European Venetic and of
Vannetais on the level of the phonological type, and the specific similarity of both of the latter
varieties in the realm of palatalization combined with asymmetrical lenition, enable the conclusion
that these were genetically related varieties of Venetic within the realm of Celtic that
later became differentiated due to areal phenomena.
http://www.jolr.ru/files/(83)jlr2012-7(33-46).pdf
year 2012 investigation