Goga
Banned
- Messages
- 2,651
- Reaction score
- 152
- Points
- 0
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- R1a*
- mtDNA haplogroup
- HV1b2
Yes, ANI is proto-Indo-European or maybe even before that, and according to Dienekes it is from West Asia that migrated into Central Asia. It's most probably R1a/R2a.People one of the biggest mistakes made by dienekes was, to name the components after Regions.
For example the so called "South Asian" component. When People hear this they usually connect it with South Asia When we find out more about the so called "South Asian" component, we recognize that there is no other component that is so much diverse. The so called "South Asian" component is a combination of two components, ASI and ANI. The South Asian among Kurds, Turks, Iranians is almost exclusively ANI.
This is what a Friend wrote me
""" See how close West Asian Component is to ANI
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-FFgv5Ekbf5s/TePJ635DfYI/AAAAAAAADyw/fCws28qg-ds/s1600/nj.png
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ndsd2vCS9dw/TePHEceJ4HI/AAAAAAAADyo/IS7sXxU5wJg/s1600/ANI%252B4.png
In deep contrast, ASI is similar to Onge component.
From his blog:
http://dodecad.blogspot.com/2011/06/ancestral-south-indian-asi-in-context.html
"I have also ran supervised K=3 ADMIXTURE analysis that treated the ASI population as test data and CHB, Onge, Papuan as parental populations; the ASI turned out 100% "Onge", consistent with the idea that ASI is distantly related to Onge, although closer than with the other two populations.
It should be noted, however, that the similarity of ASI to Onge is not unexpected, since:
* Onge was used by Reich et al. (2009) to infer admixture proportions of Indian Cline populations, which were (in turn):
* used by myself to infer allele frequencies of ASI, and then:
* used by myself to create a synthetic population of ASI individuals.
So, the Onge-ness of ASI is contingent upon the accuracy of Reich et al. (2009)"
Dodecad mixed two completely different components (ANI and ASI) into one (South Asian), which is misleading. If you look at his blog he avoided to show ANI and ASI in one plot.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Fy6fGi0y3MY/TebEfxcfepI/AAAAAAAAD0A/B3JVpmHdNAI/s1600/1_2.png
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-FFgv5Ekbf5s/TePJ635DfYI/AAAAAAAADyw/fCws28qg-ds/s1600/nj.png
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ndsd2vCS9dw/TePHEceJ4HI/AAAAAAAADyo/IS7sXxU5wJg/s1600/ANI%2B4.png
We can be sure ANI is closer to West Asian as to ASI.
But when do you think ANI in West Asian population came back into West Asia? With Medes/Scythians, Mitanni or Parthians? Or is it just native to West Asia? I don't understand this.
why Ancestral North Indians came from West Asia, not Eastern Europe :
http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2011/05/beware-of-sample-sizes-why-ancestral.html
http://dodecad.blogspot.com/2011/06/projecting-pakistan-populations-on-west.html
http://dodecad.blogspot.com/2011/05/aniasi-analysis-of-hgdp-pakistan-groups.html