Alberta’s brush with the H-bomb
The headline on the Toronto Star story was tantalizing: “Will H-bomb Solve Riddle of Tar Sands?” It was a serious question, posed in December 1958. The writer of the article, the Star’s George Noordhof, wondered if Canada’s first hydrogen bomb explosion would “free the oil from the
athabasca tar sands of Alberta?”
...
Natland suggested that Richfield explode underground a nine-kiloton atomic warhead (a “baby nuclear bomb,” as Alberta’s then premier, Ernest Manning, called it) to test his hypothesis. His theory was that the heat from the explosion would melt the sands and release liquid hydrocarbons with little risk to the atmosphere above. The molten sands would solidify into a huge glass bubble, trapping most of the radiation inside. The liquefied oil would then flow into the cavity caused by the explosion, and the oil companies would pump it out just like they did with conventional well drilling. If the experiment was successful, Natland added, the industry would have a proven scientific way to “create an oilfield on demand.”Alberta oil industry officials and politicians embraced the nuclear proposal with enthusiasm. A former lawyer for Imperial Oil, Gerry Burden, recalls that one of his Calgary colleagues, a researcher named Jim Young, had been talking for some years about using nuclear power in the same way. Premier Manning, whose Social Credit administration had been actively seeking bids from oil companies to build the first commercial separation plant in the
athabasca region, said the proposal “makes an awful lot of sense.”