Gwyllgi
Regular Member
- Messages
- 213
- Reaction score
- 10
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Wales (UK)
- Ethnic group
- Welsh
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- I don't drop acid
- mtDNA haplogroup
- Well, not any more!
Let’s talk about Female Genital Mutilation.
But be aware, I’m not going to pull any punches. It won’t be nice, it isn’t pretty, but it’s real, so if you’re a sensitive soul best not read on.
Just what IS Female Genital Mutilation.
It’s that horrid thing performed on women, especially by Mohammedans, and although not “Fardh” (compulsory) as is the case for boys, it’s “Mustahab” (VERY strongly religiously recommended)
It’s a subject that gets little media attention for a variety of reasons and virtually no police attention for a single reason, the supposedly necessity to be “Culturally Sensitive”.
Not circumcision.
And let’s make sure we give it it’s correct name, not Female Circumcision, Female Genital Mutilation.
Female circumcision is a surgical procedure that is occasionally required to cater for a condition called “hooded clitoris”. This condition can result in the skin covering the very sensitive “glans” of the clitoris not opening sufficiently, like Phimosis in a male, and so preventing contact during sexual intercourse.
Female circumcision is NOT the same as the inhuman savaging of a girls genitals that is done by so many followers of Mohammed.
Brutal disfigurement.
Even in the case of FGM the degree of mutilation varies. In the extreme it is the total excising of all external parts followed by the virtual closure of the vaginal entrance.
And all too often done by some old hag that the young girl has been taken to, and someone who uses “instruments” varying from broken glass to razor blades to do the “cutting”. This is increasingly happening to young girls taken from Europe and especially from the UK to get around European legislation.
Rubbish claims.
So why do it? It’s argued that it’s not Islamic, and yet even that is not true. It’s recorded that Mohammed, when meeting a woman who practiced the horror, instead of telling her not to do so simply advised her on the best way to do it.
For a variety of snake oil reasons it’s also presented as being a means of removing temptation from a girl so enabling her to live a more religiously compliant life.
No shit, Sherlock. Had her clitoris cut away along with much else, stitched up so that only her menses blood flow can come out, and all too frequently ever act of sex incredibly painful for her and with only the prospect of a vaginal orgasm, a thing many women never achieve.
If I was a woman it would damm certainly make ME shy away from engaging in sex.
But just see it from a mans side if a similar thing were done to him.
Dragged away as a pre-pubescent boy to some (usually) dirty old sod who proceeds to tie you down and using a rusty knife hack the end of your penis off and then stitches what’s left inside of your scrotum in such a way as to leave just a small hole to wee through.
And then, IF you survive infections and all manner of problems, later in life to be dragged by the woman chosen to be your wife, then to have her cut open the closure of your scrotum and pleasure herself on the remaining stump of your penis.
I wonder how many Mohammedans would be so keen to continue with the horrid practice if that was happened to them.
A beneficial thing?
That’s the lie put about to try to justify this horrible thing by those who like their women “small”, and de-motivated to look for comfort away from their often inadequate men.
It’s also claimed to prevent the secretions of the Bartholins gland accumulating and “turning rancid”. Maybe someone should tell them that regular washing helps. You know, that thing Western people do naturally – and often.
It is also said to “reduce excessive sensitivity of the clitoris which may cause it to increase in size to 3 centimeters when aroused, which is very annoying to the husband, especially at the time of intercourse.”
Annoying? To raise your woman to intense sexual arousal is a BAD thing?
“Another benefit of circumcision is that it prevents stimulation of the clitoris which makes it grow large in such a manner that it causes pain.”
Err, that moaning that you here is actually your woman approaching orgasm. What? You didn’t KNOW women were supposed to enjoy sex?
“Circumcision prevents spasms of the clitoris which are a kind of inflammation.”
Guess what, guys. That’s called an orgasm.
“Circumcision reduces excessive sexual desire.”
I would have thought having to live with a man with the mindset that justifies circumcision on the basis of the preceding would be a damm fine means of reducing excessive sexual desire.
Reducing ALL sexual desire would be closer to the truth.
There’s all sorts of other quack claims made ranging from it reducing the likelihood of developing cancer to toothache and everything in between. And all nonsense.
Prevalence in the EU.
There’s a lot of it about amongst the Islamic population though the origin of the immigrants does influence the take up. What’s more immigrants from some countries are taking their young back to their countries of origin to get their girls “cut” as they can not legally have it done in the EU.
Not chased up.
But the real shame that we in the EU and especially in Britain should feel is from not seeing prosecution of parents or guardians of girls who have been mutilated.
Goodness knows if you take a kid to the doctor or to hospital and there is the slightest sign of non-accidental injury, fresh or old, the medical authorities are required to investigate and involve the relevant authorities such injuries can not be shown to be non accidental.
I remember taking my own son to hospital after he had slightly burned his hand on an electric cooker ring and all the palaver that followed.
Being ignored by the authorities.
So how can it possibly be that when a girl is presented and her having been mutilated is seen all hell doesn’t break out.
And those responsible or even suspected of being responsible subjected to the whole nine yards ending in prosecution and the removal of any other kids from them, especially girls not yet subjected to the horrific genital carnage.
Governments are failing in their duty, I suspect deliberately because of “cultural sensitivity”. In other words fear of loosing votes from the Mohammedan colonies.
In a London Times article from a year ago it seems that rather than act as a bellwether that the thing has been done the NHS is to advertise free operations to reverse FGM,
Worse yet it now appears that a lot of Mohammedans don’t even bother going outside of the UK and feedback is showing that each year more than 500 British girls get “cut” here in Britain and in some cases on girls as young as five.
Inhuman.
And so, who is worse? The ignorant Mohammedan who joyfully has their child mutilated in this horrid way, or our own governments and Authorities for not creating merry hell every time a damaged child is detected?
I have a very nasty suspicion that if we are honest we would say it our governments, our self seeking politicians, and our Authorities, often paralysed by “Political Correctness” and demands from on high that they must be at all times “Culturally Aware”.
Well bloody right they should be culturally aware,
They should be culturally aware that OUR culture in which kids are preserved form harm, where a woman has the same rights and value as a man.
And where horrible utterly pointless acts that don’t even have one iota of medical benefit are superior to any so called “cultures” who don’t have the same values.
But be aware, I’m not going to pull any punches. It won’t be nice, it isn’t pretty, but it’s real, so if you’re a sensitive soul best not read on.
Just what IS Female Genital Mutilation.
It’s that horrid thing performed on women, especially by Mohammedans, and although not “Fardh” (compulsory) as is the case for boys, it’s “Mustahab” (VERY strongly religiously recommended)
It’s a subject that gets little media attention for a variety of reasons and virtually no police attention for a single reason, the supposedly necessity to be “Culturally Sensitive”.
Not circumcision.
And let’s make sure we give it it’s correct name, not Female Circumcision, Female Genital Mutilation.
Female circumcision is a surgical procedure that is occasionally required to cater for a condition called “hooded clitoris”. This condition can result in the skin covering the very sensitive “glans” of the clitoris not opening sufficiently, like Phimosis in a male, and so preventing contact during sexual intercourse.
Female circumcision is NOT the same as the inhuman savaging of a girls genitals that is done by so many followers of Mohammed.
Brutal disfigurement.
Even in the case of FGM the degree of mutilation varies. In the extreme it is the total excising of all external parts followed by the virtual closure of the vaginal entrance.
And all too often done by some old hag that the young girl has been taken to, and someone who uses “instruments” varying from broken glass to razor blades to do the “cutting”. This is increasingly happening to young girls taken from Europe and especially from the UK to get around European legislation.
Rubbish claims.
So why do it? It’s argued that it’s not Islamic, and yet even that is not true. It’s recorded that Mohammed, when meeting a woman who practiced the horror, instead of telling her not to do so simply advised her on the best way to do it.
For a variety of snake oil reasons it’s also presented as being a means of removing temptation from a girl so enabling her to live a more religiously compliant life.
No shit, Sherlock. Had her clitoris cut away along with much else, stitched up so that only her menses blood flow can come out, and all too frequently ever act of sex incredibly painful for her and with only the prospect of a vaginal orgasm, a thing many women never achieve.
If I was a woman it would damm certainly make ME shy away from engaging in sex.
But just see it from a mans side if a similar thing were done to him.
Dragged away as a pre-pubescent boy to some (usually) dirty old sod who proceeds to tie you down and using a rusty knife hack the end of your penis off and then stitches what’s left inside of your scrotum in such a way as to leave just a small hole to wee through.
And then, IF you survive infections and all manner of problems, later in life to be dragged by the woman chosen to be your wife, then to have her cut open the closure of your scrotum and pleasure herself on the remaining stump of your penis.
I wonder how many Mohammedans would be so keen to continue with the horrid practice if that was happened to them.
A beneficial thing?
That’s the lie put about to try to justify this horrible thing by those who like their women “small”, and de-motivated to look for comfort away from their often inadequate men.
It’s also claimed to prevent the secretions of the Bartholins gland accumulating and “turning rancid”. Maybe someone should tell them that regular washing helps. You know, that thing Western people do naturally – and often.
It is also said to “reduce excessive sensitivity of the clitoris which may cause it to increase in size to 3 centimeters when aroused, which is very annoying to the husband, especially at the time of intercourse.”
Annoying? To raise your woman to intense sexual arousal is a BAD thing?
“Another benefit of circumcision is that it prevents stimulation of the clitoris which makes it grow large in such a manner that it causes pain.”
Err, that moaning that you here is actually your woman approaching orgasm. What? You didn’t KNOW women were supposed to enjoy sex?
“Circumcision prevents spasms of the clitoris which are a kind of inflammation.”
Guess what, guys. That’s called an orgasm.
“Circumcision reduces excessive sexual desire.”
I would have thought having to live with a man with the mindset that justifies circumcision on the basis of the preceding would be a damm fine means of reducing excessive sexual desire.
Reducing ALL sexual desire would be closer to the truth.
There’s all sorts of other quack claims made ranging from it reducing the likelihood of developing cancer to toothache and everything in between. And all nonsense.
Prevalence in the EU.
There’s a lot of it about amongst the Islamic population though the origin of the immigrants does influence the take up. What’s more immigrants from some countries are taking their young back to their countries of origin to get their girls “cut” as they can not legally have it done in the EU.
Not chased up.
But the real shame that we in the EU and especially in Britain should feel is from not seeing prosecution of parents or guardians of girls who have been mutilated.
Goodness knows if you take a kid to the doctor or to hospital and there is the slightest sign of non-accidental injury, fresh or old, the medical authorities are required to investigate and involve the relevant authorities such injuries can not be shown to be non accidental.
I remember taking my own son to hospital after he had slightly burned his hand on an electric cooker ring and all the palaver that followed.
Being ignored by the authorities.
So how can it possibly be that when a girl is presented and her having been mutilated is seen all hell doesn’t break out.
And those responsible or even suspected of being responsible subjected to the whole nine yards ending in prosecution and the removal of any other kids from them, especially girls not yet subjected to the horrific genital carnage.
Governments are failing in their duty, I suspect deliberately because of “cultural sensitivity”. In other words fear of loosing votes from the Mohammedan colonies.
In a London Times article from a year ago it seems that rather than act as a bellwether that the thing has been done the NHS is to advertise free operations to reverse FGM,
Worse yet it now appears that a lot of Mohammedans don’t even bother going outside of the UK and feedback is showing that each year more than 500 British girls get “cut” here in Britain and in some cases on girls as young as five.
Inhuman.
And so, who is worse? The ignorant Mohammedan who joyfully has their child mutilated in this horrid way, or our own governments and Authorities for not creating merry hell every time a damaged child is detected?
I have a very nasty suspicion that if we are honest we would say it our governments, our self seeking politicians, and our Authorities, often paralysed by “Political Correctness” and demands from on high that they must be at all times “Culturally Aware”.
Well bloody right they should be culturally aware,
They should be culturally aware that OUR culture in which kids are preserved form harm, where a woman has the same rights and value as a man.
And where horrible utterly pointless acts that don’t even have one iota of medical benefit are superior to any so called “cultures” who don’t have the same values.
