Not disagreeing on this as its likely correct. I mean, after the Antonio et al paper it was evident by the different clusters, that there was a Levantine cluster IIRC. C4 or C7 can't recall which one it was, have not read the paper in year/s. The presence of such a cluster is proof that people of Levant were present during Roman times in Rome. I mean it isn't such a surprise given the region was part of Rome in the BCs already. I really fail to see why this is so controversial. In my mind to get modern Albanians one needs two shifts as I have mentioned many times, an eastern shift to pull Illyrians south east and a northern shift (which might have been multi phased, Sarmatian, Slavic and Germanic). Only reason why I have a bone to pick in this debate.