bicicleur 2
Regular Member
- Messages
- 6,442
- Reaction score
- 1,488
- Points
- 113
I used the data from this file :
https://genetiker.wordpress.com/2016/10/07/k-14-admixture-analysis-of-lapita-genomes/
and tagged the colour codes as follows :
this is not 100 % correct, but it is for clarity
I studied some parts of the file and tried to make some conclusions.
I'd like your comments.
This is the first part I studied :
1/ Gravettian/Aurignacian contains > 50 % WHG
2/ Villabruna cluster = WHG
3/ steppe admixture starts in Bichon, Loschbour and Motala
4/ Pitted Ware NHG = WHG + some steppe & EEF, actually more steppe than EEF
I'll post more parts of the file with my comments later.
https://genetiker.wordpress.com/2016/10/07/k-14-admixture-analysis-of-lapita-genomes/
and tagged the colour codes as follows :
| purple | papua | |
| red | karitiana | |
| orange | eskimo/chuckchi ( + red) | |
| dark brown | yoruba | |
| beige/light brown | atayal (Taiwan aboriginees) | |
| black | bushmen Namibia | |
| navy blue | WHG, villabruna cluster | |
| blue | Steppe Afanasievo – Yamna ( + blue/green) | |
| ligth blue grey | EEF – NW Asia Minor EN | |
| ligth blue gloss | Natufian ( + black, light blue grey, red) | |
| blue/green (teal) | Iran EN / CHG | |
| green | South Asia, India ( + other colours) | |
| yellow | Japan, Korea, Han, Mongol ( + beige/light brown, other colours) | |
| off white | Nganasan (Samoyed Tarim peninsula) |
this is not 100 % correct, but it is for clarity
I studied some parts of the file and tried to make some conclusions.
I'd like your comments.
This is the first part I studied :
1/ Gravettian/Aurignacian contains > 50 % WHG
2/ Villabruna cluster = WHG
3/ steppe admixture starts in Bichon, Loschbour and Motala
4/ Pitted Ware NHG = WHG + some steppe & EEF, actually more steppe than EEF
I'll post more parts of the file with my comments later.
Last edited by a moderator:


