^It seems plausible to me, although the oceanian hunter gatherer appearing here and there in western eurasians is a mystery to me... Very likely, just some noise.
Here are my results (sorted):
1. Iberian: 22.17
2. Italian: 13.93
3. North Sea: 9.69
4. North Atlantic: 9.39
5. West Med: 6.81
6. Central Euro: 6.80
7. East Med: 4.95
8. Amerindian: 4.53
9. East Central Euro: 4.41
10. French: 4.02
11. Fennoscandian: 2.64
12. Arabian: 2.60
13. Near Eastern: 2.34
14. East Balkan: 2.19
15: Others: 3.53
Are you native of Sweden?
I have a little bit of almost everything too. mtDNA is HV4, yDNA is T. Interesting mix for Italian and Sicilian. I left out anything <1%.
Arabian 5.85%
Armenian 4.93%
Central_Euro 1.78%
East_Balkan 2.19%
East_Med 13.42%
Fennoscandian 1.37%
French 3.65%
Iberian 13.92%
Italian 20.69%
Near_Eastern 13.77%
North_African 2.53%
North_Atlantic 2.47%
North_Caucasian 1.53%
North_Sea 2.51%
West_Caucasian 3.76%
West_Med 5.19%
I would not bother with K36 as it is weigted in the Iberian area ( to capture the americas)
use MDLP 23b ..............its the last which is of any use......IMO
I would not bother with K36 as it is weigted in the Iberian area ( to capture the americas)
use MDLP 23b ..............its the last which is of any use......IMO
Where is the proof of an Iberian bias in Eurogenes K36?
no! Basque ancestors lived in France most likely in the Loire Atlantique region, they are probably from a group of invading the other branch (the Angles or Old English are the other representatives, the fact is that M153 is a small proportion of Basque is not found that among the English, Basque and Catalan, which demonstrates penetration of group three directions and a little over 2000 years ago, but they are not originales Pyrenees and so what if that. Feit penalty to those who claim.
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffff"] Population |