Look up threads in this forum about E-v13, they're full of links that put in the Neolithic. So it is neolithic everywhere in the balkans, excepts in tiny kosovo, where it is supposed to be 250 AD, nevermind that the highest density is in kosovo and the distribution maps show its epicenter over there. That dienekes link is just some anonimous dude in 2008, in his spare time playing with the
Ken Nordtvedt's Generations2 program, choosing his own input. That's not a serious published study.
better look again threads in the forum,
half posts say that is not neolithic but about 2000 BC and many other others say earlier,
If I remember correct Battaglia also claims that in bronze maritime entrance
why you want to create impressions?
it is not only Nortvedt, but also many others, who say that is maritime, not neolithic, copper or bronze age,
you still claim that gennetic laws are just like liquid fluid laws,
that from high density spreads around,
but genetical laws say that from high diversity we know the age and starting point, which until today surely is not Kossovo but Greece at 1rst and Bosnia at 2nd
besides no matter the scientific claims, archaiology in balkans say no ancient E-V13, but in minor asia around 2000 BC,
now if you claim Iberian Neolithic E, then why you don't claim Ethiopean which is closer and older, Paleolithic.
how would like if I say that E-V13 is paleolithic since it is older in Cyprus which is more closer than Iberia?
maybe Cypriots with heavy E-V13 are from kossovo high peak?
or they are Arbanites as you claim in another post about the high peaks of E-v13 in Greece? making Arbanites 2 millions in Greece, while by their own clubs stats are only 150 000.
you think according propaganda, not according science.