modern greeks
ethnicity: christian turks with arvanites (albanians) who play the role of modern (even ancient) greeks.
language: mix of turkish and koine (byzantine common language and adopted to the modern greeks).
genetics: non-european, (sub-saharan)
modern macedonians
ethnicity: original macedonians (was macedonians and will continue to be macedonians)
language: macedonian (one of the oldest languages in europe and root to all slavic languages)
genetics: oldest balkan people (original macedonians)
there is evidence of this facts, just see the other posts in same thread (macedonians).
"Macedonian is the origin of all slavic languages Webster Dictionary year 1967-1969!"
how yes no
does that make sense? with This?
Most sources in and out of Bulgaria before the Second World War referred to the
southern Slavonic dialect continuum covering the area of today's
Republic of Macedonia as a group of Bulgarian dialects.
[16][17][18][19][20][21] The local variants of the name of the language are
balgàrtski,
bolgàrtski, bulgàrtski
,[22] bògartski,
bogàrtski,
bùgarski or
bugàrski.
Some linguists consider them still as such, but this view is politically controversial.[23][24][25] After WWII, the question about the Bulgarian character of the language in the territory of the Republic of Macedonia was put aside in the name of Bulgarian-Yugoslavian friendship under the pressure of the Soviet Union. After 1958 when the pressure from Moscow decreased, Sofia turned back to the view that the
Macedonian language did not exist as a separate language.
Does the Quote Make sence with this
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Map_Peloponnesian_War_431_BC-en.svg
or this
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Map_Macedonia_336_BC-en.svg
watch Fyrom AT Makedonian kingdom times
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/Paeonians.png
now HOW YES NO
do you understand????
LOOK THE GENETIC SIMILARITY OF FYROM AND SERBIA AND BOSNIA
THE FYROM IS MORE SERBIAN THAN SERBIA
WHY? BECAUSE IN TESTS IS A BIG ALBANIAN E-V13 WHICH IS FROM ALBANIAN MINORITY
Albanians are 30% of population and have 45% E-V13
so if you make the mathematical references then you see that Fyrom is Near 40% I2a
same as Serbia and almost Bosnia
Now about Culture and Language are more connected with the medieval Western Bulgarian Culture and Language
The Truth is that many times I was wondering if I2a has to do with ancient Thracians
But Many times I come back from Thoukidides when says that Athens spoke Tyrrshenian before Greek
the fact is that Thracians ruled upon many cultures or learn Language from J2
(Greco-Aryan approach not Kurgan-Hypothesis)
Greco-Thracians
North East Daci-Thracians
East Odrysse-Thracians
West Illyro-Thracians
Central and North-West tribes that were carriers of I2a (fyrom Bosnia Serbia etc)
Minor Asia Thracians, Italy Thracians
the linguistic and culture connection is bigger as long we back until almost 2-3 000 BC
and it is different before
Today modern Bulgarian and Dacian are trying to connect their language with Ancient Thracian
for example even claim to be Thracian as also Kossovo, turkey etc
crete spain italy the bull is
Toro or
tavro or
tauro
Athens is
BOLOS Thessaly Makedonia is
BOLinthros
Bulgarian Fyrom is
BOL
Serbian Croatian HUngarian is
BIK
but the calf is
Crete ThessalianEast Makedonian
Vodali VIDALI (itali Vitalli)
Aromanian-armani, albanian is
Damali Demi
Athens Central-West Makedonia
Moschos Mouskar
Bulgarian Fyrom Serbia
Ucraine Telec
the last is according History
meaning that the word 'telec' came from Ucraine to Balkans
at Slavic invasions times (500-600 AD)_
and not from south-central Balkans (Fyrom) to Ucraine
as Dejavu claims
"Macedonian is the origin of all slavic languages"
But the BOL-BOLOS-Bolinthros tells us that Athens and Bulgaria had similar Language before
(tyrrshenian)
as you see linguistic the lines although they connect, although they divide,
Many works that have been done by linguists gave similarity by majority of words (mainly not IE)
and not by one or few, that leads to connection of nations before times
as also Genetic engineering does
you can not have N Y-dna and claim to be ancient Hollander
you maybe are Hollander cause your family lived there 50-1000 years etc and you are assimilated
But that does not mean that Ancient Hollanders were N
AM I CLEAR HOW YES NO?