Taranis
Yes I did a cherry pick of words but not from all,
from a basket of words thathave simmilar sounds and meanings among Summerian Akkadian and IE,
That is something that many linguists do, and you know that with same way IE theory started,
I just pick 3-5 words, But these are not the only ones,
Now.
by watching Summerian Akkadian IE Lexicons I watch some simmilarity,
so that similarity can be Diabolic coinsidence, but how much?
if the words are not few but much more, that shows connectivity (not relative)
a good for example if Hettits enter from Steppe to minor Asia how come they have Akkadian (semitic?) Deity Illuwanka? how come we find words far away from Summeria in IE vocabulary,
I know you can tell me the example of wine and οινος, true, but won't you think is much more?
for example the word house οικος and ehus can follow the rules of the wine example?
that can be explained (at least for me, and now, tommorow will bring more discoveries) by:
1) early Neolithic farming was Summerian speaking and left vocabulary later to steppe people?
2) IE was a language spoken close to Summerian and spread to steppe before arsenic bronze?
3) Summerians were also steppe people?
I repeat the cherry pick as you called it I did it as an example, I do not have the time to write down all words,
besides that is a good Idea for a young linguist
I do not want to claim ISOs or Phds
Just because something has a similar sound (that's debatable too) and similar meaning does not automantically mean it is actually a cognate. To pick an example, take English "name" and Japanese "namae". The way you work, these two words should be obviously cognates (they are not), but Welsh "enw" (which is an actual cognate of English "name"!) would evade your notice because it obviously looks to dissimilar. The only way to avoid this is to consider which sound corresponds regularly to which sound, and which sound changes happened in a language's past: you wouldn't automatically recognize Greek "oinos" (οινος) and Hebrew "jajn" (יינ) as cognates, but if I tell you that in ancient Greek, *w > Ø and in Hebrew *w- > *j-, you get
*woinos and
*wajn and the similarity becomes more obvious. By the way, in the same way as "oinos" derives from an earlier "woinos", "oikos" derives from an earlier
*woikos, which you can link with Latin "vicus" (village).
For instance, you made a comparison between a Russian (or otherwise Slavic) word, a Greek word (the two which are probably not even related with each other), and a Sumerian word. Do you want to argue that Sumerian was spoken in Migration Period Balkans? To demonstrate what you actually want (correspondences between PIE and Sumerian), then you should demonstrate what an ancestral PIE form was (perhaps, show reflexes in other branches of IE, such as Indo-Aryan or Germanic, and show regular sound correspondences), and then demonstrate how the PIE forms correspond regularly with the Sumerian ones.
Another frequent mistake that you and others make is that you perceive compounds where there are none and start to dismantle a word where there is nothing to do dismantle. For this, let me take an
obviously nonsensical example of why such "magic word dismantlements" do not work: I will take the Gaulish deity name "Belisama". For the sake of an argument, I argue that it is Chinese in etymology, by tearing it apart as 貝力傻馬 (Bei Li Sha Ma). I could continue like this with about every Gaulish name, and at the end of the day I would argue this:
1) that modern Mandarin Chinese is unchanging and that it was spoken already 2400 years ago (wow, who knew!)
2) that there was Chinese presence in pre-Roman Gaul (sensational!).
As I said, this example is obvious nonsense, but this is how you people (Yetos, you're not the only one) draw your conclusions here.
With Sumerian (by the way, it's "Sumerian" and NOT "
Summerian"), everything should be taken a bit cautious: it is the oldest attested written language, it ceased to be spoken around 4000 years ago, and everything that we know or think to know comes through the filter of Akkadian and the Cuneiform script. There is a great deal of things we do not know for certain as a result. Any language we might want to compare Sumerian to was spoken thousands of years later, which leaves an even greater room for uncertainty.
