strongvoicesforward
I'm back.
- Messages
- 1,290
- Reaction score
- 23
- Points
- 0
- Ethnic group
- The primordial soup
After WW2 Jews were given a land in Palestine so as to make their own country. However, Palestinians were already living there. Surviving European Jews, Russian Jews, and even U.S. Jews began arriving in order to build a country they could call their own.
Until recently I almost always felt like the Jewish country had a right to exist in Palestine, however, after reading on it and thinking a little more on it I have begun to see more clearly the Palestinian view.
Of course, Jews make a cultural claim to lands in Palestine based on their religion, but they had long since lost that claim by not being able to maintain a country for thousands of years. Faits accompli perhaps should have applied to them and they should not have been the benefactors of a forcefully created country.
The question I have for Europeans, mainly Brits, France, and even Americans to some extent -- but let me use Britain as an example:
If the winning powers of WW2 felt so guilty and sorry for the atrocities that the Jews experienced during WW2, rather than artificially creating a country for them in Palestine, already occupied by natives there, why not say give them Northern Ireland and displace the Irish? How would Brits or the Irish feel about that (minus the Jewish biblical claim)? In America`s case, why not give them one whole state to congregate in and make a country?
The more I think of it, I just feel the Palestinians are in a similar plight as the U.S. Indians 200 years ago. They have been displaced by intruders. The only difference is, the Palestinians are not going as easily or quietly.
Was that U.S. and European arrogance to do that (i.e. forcefully create a country onto a land for foreignors to come and take over and relegate the native inhabitants to inferior status) to the Palestinians?
My opinion is "Yes" it was and the creation of Israel was wrong.
Until recently I almost always felt like the Jewish country had a right to exist in Palestine, however, after reading on it and thinking a little more on it I have begun to see more clearly the Palestinian view.
Of course, Jews make a cultural claim to lands in Palestine based on their religion, but they had long since lost that claim by not being able to maintain a country for thousands of years. Faits accompli perhaps should have applied to them and they should not have been the benefactors of a forcefully created country.
The question I have for Europeans, mainly Brits, France, and even Americans to some extent -- but let me use Britain as an example:
If the winning powers of WW2 felt so guilty and sorry for the atrocities that the Jews experienced during WW2, rather than artificially creating a country for them in Palestine, already occupied by natives there, why not say give them Northern Ireland and displace the Irish? How would Brits or the Irish feel about that (minus the Jewish biblical claim)? In America`s case, why not give them one whole state to congregate in and make a country?
The more I think of it, I just feel the Palestinians are in a similar plight as the U.S. Indians 200 years ago. They have been displaced by intruders. The only difference is, the Palestinians are not going as easily or quietly.
Was that U.S. and European arrogance to do that (i.e. forcefully create a country onto a land for foreignors to come and take over and relegate the native inhabitants to inferior status) to the Palestinians?
My opinion is "Yes" it was and the creation of Israel was wrong.