M
Mike Cash
Guest
Thought you might be interested in seeing this news article:
http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,18194460^2862,00.html
http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,18194460^2862,00.html
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's interesting how your perception of Mike's intention with this thread is so different from mine. I thought he was doing something sweet by starting a thread that he thought might interest you - especially as he rarely starts threads. It never occurred to me that he was trying to provoke you.Hyde_is_my_anti-drug said:Wow, talk about baiting someone. This is low even for you dear Mike.
Maybe. I actually think Mike is quite fond of you.Hyde_is_my_anti-drug said:You call this "sweet"? Well, that certainly is another way of looking at it. But my statement still stands.
Thank yoooooooooooou, SVF-san! Seriously, Mike, you did not have to put my name in the title. Putting it there is clearly a bait to get me to reply.strongvoicesforward said:Like Hyde, I, too, saw it as baiting. Why should that story be, "One for Hyde," just because Hyde is a lesbian? Just because Hyde is a lesbian, does that mean all things "lesbian" are "one for her?"
Why not put the article on a thread with a title without Hyde`s handle affixed to it and ask for people`s opinion on it. That way Hyde can comment freely if she wants rather than having a "megaphone" announcement to her. What if I were to post handles in a number of religious threads aimed directly at a particular member? I am guessing that would have gotten the quick whip of censorship. wink wink Some of you know what I am talking about.
Kinsao said:I agree with Sabro. Personally I'm pretty sure if I'd worn my 'I like men' shirt for my school pic, I would have been asked to change out of it. That's not sexually 'explicit' but... well, rules for school are known to be more restrictive and 'prudish' than for the outside world, so unfortunately we have to deal with it!
This thread has been viewed 24330 times.