Racism

  • Thread starter Thread starter smurf
  • Start date Start date
anothergirl said:
wow, I am new here and you sir ARE pretty racist. You are the the worst kind of racist actually...
Click to expand...
Wow, worse than Hitler, that's a serious accusation!

The European virtue signaling in this thread is interesting.
 
Angela said:
He is indeed, another girl. Thankfully, he is no longer with us. I'm sorry that you had to encounter that kind of post during your first foray onto the site.

Give us a chance; most people are not like that.
Click to expand...

I at first was wondering why you were calling him another girl...:)
 
I1a3_Young said:
Wow, worse than Hitler, that's a serious accusation!

The European virtue signaling in this thread is interesting.
Click to expand...

It's virtue signaling to acknowledge that Seanp is a racist as well as an agenda driven *****? Since when? As far as I'm concerned those are statements of fact. Perhaps you should read some of his posts again.

Then again, maybe fellow travelers of Seanp and Sikelliot and Principe are racist or Nordicist signalling? I'll have to be on the watch for that.
 
Angela said:
It's virtue signaling to acknowledge that Seanp is a racist as well as an agenda driven *****? Since when? As far as I'm concerned those are statements of fact. Perhaps you should read some of his posts again.

Then again, maybe fellow travelers of Seanp and Sikelliot and Principe are racist or Nordicist signalling? I'll have to be on the watch for that.
Click to expand...
I was referring to the whole thread and attitudes in general, but I fail to see how post #58 is worse than Hitler. You would certainly be more knowledgeable about trends and post histories though. I'm not going to defend racist statements, but if I see them I'll refute them with fact rather than public shaming tactics to force political correctness without room for discussion.

It is very interesting to see differing opinions from around the world about this.
 
I think there are three definitions for racism:

one, is the belief that a "race" is "superior" to others. Two, is that that belief should lead to discriminatory laws. Three, a preference for some kind of phenotypic traits in social relationships.

I think number two is clearly wrong. However, number three is perfect reasonable. But in our society, political correctness is leading towards saying that three is bad.

For example, is it bad to prefer some kind of phenotypic trait when looking for a couple? Of course, it would be bad to say that some kind of mixed-phenotype-couples are forbidden by law. But extremist political-correctness is confusing both things, which are very different to each other.

However, we constantly choose in our social interactions, with many different metrics (often, inadvertently of that).

Even more, political correctness is leading towards suppressing natural behaviours, such as preferring your own kin, or having children. Political correctness is leading more and more to make believe to people that we should prefer others rather than our own kin (if we are white; otherwise not) and that it is cool not to have children. Note: I am talking from a European point of view.
 
coolfrenchguy said:
I'am ethno-differencialist but not racist
Click to expand...

Thank you for obligate me to take a break to do a quick research. I did not know the term ethno-differentialism.
I thought it was a neologism. But now I see that it is a concept that has relatively old roots in Europe, especially in France, where the concept seems to have been born and spread.
Interesting worldview!
I did not know that there was the concept of ethno-differentialism as opposed to the concept of racism.

NHWozAb.png

cCOULf4.png
 
ethnopluralism is a dangerous ideology imo. first, why would you want that ethnicities stay seperated? second, how are you going to make sure they stay seperated? there are a lot of people, the majority who doesn't care about this stuff. these "ethnopluralists" try to get into politics with their identitarian movements, where they just do not belong, in the end it would just end in oppression. they can make their own week end clubs and sit around a table drinking beer and talk about their ideologies if they want.
 
Last edited:
Ailchu said:
ethnopluralism is a dangerous ideology imo. first, why would you want that ethnicities stay seperated? second, how are you going to make sure they stay seperated? there are a lot of people, the majority who doesn't care about this stuff. these "ethnopluralists" try to get into politics with their identitarian movements, where they just do not belong, in the end it would just end in oppression. they can make their own week end clubs and sit around a table drinking beer and talk about their ideologies if they want.
Click to expand...

Agree with the danger. It’s hard to work together when we’re ‘told’ other groups are so different that we don’t share the same “truth.”
 
Friendship is magic dawg, we don?t need to go all tribal in the 21st Century. I don?t care what political party, race or religion you are in, as long as you are not causing harm were cool. :)
 
Give me a break. People have been mixing with different people since the beginning of humanity. We even mixed with Neanderthals for goodness sakes. Humanity has never been static, nor have we ever stayed in one place, we migrate, communicate, mingle etc and create new groups. The only thing that binds people together are common cultures. And if anything, it's white men that lust after east asian women more than anything. No one tells them to, right ? Lets not have double standards here or neglect to acknowledge that humanity is the product of various populations blending genetically, linguistically and culturally. No hate against you at all but come on now!!
 
I dont support racism .. At any situation
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top