Keeni84 said:
What do you mean? If I am missing something, please tell me, because it is evident from these posts that I really want to know!
What I mean is that having no knowledge of one's heritage is not exceptional, it's the rule.
Maybe you are more aware of the missing links/branches/roots than most other people in the world. But that's it. There are a lot of people in the world who talk about their great heritage, be it cultural or familial, but what they know are either legends or just a tiny fraction of the whole picture.
Awareness is the only real difference.
You and I both know that human beings are emotional and at many times, irrational. Should I not be affected because you want to "prove" that it is irrational to be affected? No.
I think, you should not be affected because there is no rational reason to be. Well, look who's talking: being an emotional low-burner. :banghead:
I can't really understand how anybody could have such feelings about history.
When my grandma tells me stories about the bomb nights in WW II, I'm interested & feel a certain pity for her. I don't feel personally affected in any way, though.
You have your feelings & I have to accept that. I don't have these feelings & can't really understand your reasons, though.
Maybe if you come to Germany once, I can invite you to a cup of coffee & you may be able to hammer your reasons into my head. :box:
Golgo_13 said:
That had there never been any slavery, most black Americans today would be living in poor countries of Western Africa. Thus, black Americans enjoy far more economic opportunity and higher standard of living than blacks in any other nation on earth today.
That is true to a point. The question is, where would these West African nations be today if colonialism wouldn't have existed? (Well, in the first place most of them probably wouldn't exist at all.) Nobody knows & nobody will know, therefore this comparison is not really valid.
Satori said:
Sorry, Golgo, but why in the world would I want to read anything this racist Larry Elder has to say about anything?!
Because only when you read what he says you can judge if he is racist or not! Here is a speech he held about the "10 things":
http://www.cato.org/events/transcripts/000913et2.pdf
This way you don't have to read the whole book.
BTW, what's so racist about the "10 things"? Except for the 1st one you couldn't really call anything racist. Even the 1st one is not necessarily racist if supported by valid statistics.