Stonehenge Was Built by Black People, according to Children’s History Book

real expert

Regular Member
Messages
796
Reaction score
456
Points
63

Stonehenge was built when Britain was a 'black country', new children's book claims​

  • Brilliant Black British History is by Nigerian-born British author Atinuke
  • It also claims 'every single British person comes from a migrant'

Stonehenge was built by black people, a new children's history book has claimed.

Readers of Brilliant Black British History, by the Nigerian-born British author Atinuke, are told the neolithic monument in Wiltshire was built while Britain was a 'black country'.

The book, which is aimed at children aged seven and above, also tells readers that 'every single British person comes from a migrant' and that the 'very first Britons were black'.

The introduction adds that Britain has been 'mostly a white country for a lot less time than it has been mostly a black country'.


Atinuke also claims that the remains of the 10,000-year-old Cheddar Man belonged to someone who had 'skin as dark as dark can be'.

A facial reconstruction of Cheddar Man depicted him as having dark skin in 2018, although one expert involved in the project insisted it was a 'probable profile' rather than a certainty.

Brilliant Black British History is published by Bloomsbury and promoted by literacy charity The Book Trust, which itself is funded by the Arts Council.


The book takes readers through an overview of the presence of black people in Britain.

It says that Britain was 'a black country more than 7,000 years before white people came and during that time the most famous British monument was built, Stonehenge'.

But research published in 2019 suggested the Neolithic farmers who built Stonehenge had paler skin and were descended from populations originating in Anatolia in what is now Turkey.

They also likely had brown eyes and black or dark-brown hair.

Atinuke's book also features illustrations of Britain during various periods of its history.

One page shows an image of a black Roman legionary fighting a white Celt.

The author claims the Romans had 'turned back to Europe and pushed north' after trying and failing to conquer the African kingdom of Nubia.

By the Middle Ages, Britain was a 'hodgepodge of people', according to the author.

The population was made up of 'original British migrants, Celts, Romans, Britons, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings, Africans and Normans'.

They also spoke 'a hodgepodge language too - English'.

A page on the Black Lives Matter movement says that although race 'does not scientifically exist', black people suffer 'institutional racism'.

The book is billed in its blurb as an 'eye-opening history of Britain' that focuses on 'a part of our past that has mostly been left out of the history books: the brilliant black history of England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland'.

It adds: 'Did you know that the first Britons were black? Or that some of the Roman soldiers who invaded and ruled Britain were black, too?

'Join this fascinating journey through the ages to meet those first Britons, as well as the black Tudors, Georgians and Victorians who existed in every walk of life here.'

The book was published on August 31

The research into Cheddar Man was carried out by a team from University College London.

Cheddar Man's remains - the oldest near-complete human skeleton ever found in Britain - were unearthed in 1903 in Gough's Cave, in Somerset's Cheddar Gorge.

DNA tests suggested he had black skin, dark curly hair and blue eyes.

Geneticist Susan Walsh at Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, who helped create the reconstruction of Cheddar Man's face, said soon afterwards that although it was 'probable' he had dark skin, DNA testing was not advanced enough to say for certain.

The new book comes after campaign group Don't Divide Us revealed in a report how children are being exposed to controversial 'anti-racism' theories.

The investigation exposed a book that tells children racism started when 'white people wanted more control'.

Another encouraged teachers to tell children 'what white privilege is'.




On a page featuring an image of a black Roman legionary fighting a white Celt, Atinuke’s book says Rome “turned back to Europe and pushed north” to conquer Britain after first being unable to take the African kingdom of Nubia.The book states that the Roman historian Tacitus reported that the Silures people in Wales were “dark-skinned and curly-haired”. In Tacitus’ full account, he theorised that they may have been from Spain. It adds that, by the Middle Ages, Britain was “a hodgepodge of people: original British migrants, Celts, Romans, Britons, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings, Africans and Normans”, adding: “They spoke a hodgepodge language too – English”. In the period of the Tudors and Stewarts, an incoming black Muslim population brought “new knowledge about textiles, medicine, maths and navigation”.

In the name of inclusion and black representation Children are spoon-fed and indoctrinated with lies, fabricated history and imagination, and state-sponsored woke propaganda. And they get away with it.

The UK is a seriously broken nation.
 
Pics of the author of Brilliant Black British History Atinuke, who has written several books for children and the depictions in her book:
1695297210376.png


1695297072323.png
 
From what I understand, genetic studies do not support that Mesolithic and Neolithic European populations, beyond the pigmentation of their skin, were genetically related to sub-Saharan populations.
 
ALL people who comment on skin colour are gender racists........either against Women or Men of the opposite colour of themselves.........that is the answer to these people and why they make these comments
 
From what I understand, genetic studies do not support that Mesolithic and Neolithic European populations, beyond the pigmentation of their skin, were genetically related to sub-Saharan populations.


The Nigerian-born author, like the BBC or Netflix, is unconcerned about facts, truth, true history, or DNA, and they are purposefully misleading and misinforming the public, particularly youngsters. They aren't concerned with intellectual integrity or historical accuracy; it's all about sentiments, the woke narrative, and spreading propaganda to native Brits, telling them that neither their country nor their past belong to them, but to any migrants or foreigners who set foot in Britain. Because the Cheddar Man was believed to be dark to black skinned and the early European farmers originated from Anatolian population who landed in Europe and Britain 10,000 years ago, the British had an obligation to accept limitless mass migration from Africa and other areas. Consequently, they misrepresent the Cheddar Man and early European farmers as black Africans.



At the same time, they treat black Brits, who mostly hail from West Africa, as if they didn't have their African heritage and roots outside Britain. Basically, all of the black Brits are descendants of very recent migrants. It seems that liberals and wokes believe that black people have nothing to be proud of and that their African origin and history are so shameful and inferior and British history and culture so superior that blacks must have to be beamed and written into British history to feel good about themselves. Even the Stoneage Cheddar Man and the WHG are a greater source of pride according to them than any Subsaharan African. So unless you turn ancient Brits, Romans, even the Tudors and Stuarts into black people, black people can never be uplifted and their self-esteem restored. That people don't see the racism here and how blacks are being belittled and patronized by the BBC and other woke activists disguised as scholars is staggering.




Liberals and wokes appear to believe that black people have nothing to be proud of, that their African origins and history are so terrible and low, and British history and culture are so superior, that blacks must be shined and inscribed into British history to feel good about themselves. According to them, the Stoneage Cheddar Man and the WHG are a larger source of pride than any Subsaharan African. So, unless ancient Brits or Romans are transformed into black people, black people will never be exalted and their self-esteem restored. It's incredible that people don't recognize the racism here, and how blacks are being belittled and patronized by the BBC and other woke activists masquerading as professors. So, what are those liberals saying?



Here is another illustration of how history has been distorted. In a BBC history program for children not only the Cheddar Man but also the Ancient Romans and later Brits are falsely presented as black Africans and forefathers of modern black Brits.


Once again, what those liberal Marxists or liberal leftists are interested in is rewriting history, erasing white people from the foundations of their own nations and histories, and inserting Subsaharan Africans into British history as if they were an integral part of British heritage and contributed significantly to its culture, which they simply did not. Is already known that the Stonehege builders were early European farmers, and the Bell Beakers were not black African people nor related to them, but they don't get credit for it.
 
Last edited:
I wonder who they're trying to appropiate
If it is the Native Sardinian-like Megalithics, those with a Y-Chromosome from an alleged "dark-skinned people"

Or they're going for the Celts
Which by the way, they came in the middle of construction of the Stonehenge site and could have been some sort of "immigrants"
 
It's the problem when people read one news article and think they know everything. The Cheddar Man was reported in British media to have dark skin or black skin (depending on the site), and indeed Mesolithic Western European hunter-gatherers seem to have been dark skinned (with blue eyes). But Stonehenge was built by Neolithic farmers from the Near East, who undeniably had white skin, although probably closer to modern Mediterranean people than modern British people.
 
Freedom is so important! Until giving everybody who reads studies without understand them the right to write "educative books"!
 
What a load of rubbish ! How can a book be available when there is no real evidence for what the author I saying !
sad indictment of bad research and blatent ignorance.
 
This has nothing to do with facts. They are not publishing this nonsense to debate facts. This is about turning people into rootless nomads, black people included. Instead of exploring African history, they are rewriting European history. You have to follow the money and eventually you'll arrive at the WEF and the financial world which sees the entire planet as a limitless supply of "human capital" and which is about tearing down all borders and differences as they are hindering the free flow of capital. There is no diversity at the top of the financial chain though.
 
Last edited:
The Nigerian-born author, like the BBC or Netflix, is unconcerned about facts, truth, true history, or DNA, and they are purposefully misleading and misinforming the public, particularly youngsters. They aren't concerned with intellectual integrity or historical accuracy; it's all about sentiments, the woke narrative, and spreading propaganda to native Brits, telling them that neither their country nor their past belong to them, but to any migrants or foreigners who set foot in Britain. Because the Cheddar Man was believed to be dark to black skinned and the early European farmers originated from Anatolian population who landed in Europe and Britain 10,000 years ago, the British had an obligation to accept limitless mass migration from Africa and other areas. Consequently, they misrepresent the Cheddar Man and early European farmers as black Africans.



At the same time, they treat black Brits, who mostly hail from West Africa, as if they didn't have their African heritage and roots outside Britain. Basically, all of the black Brits are descendants of very recent migrants. It seems that liberals and wokes believe that black people have nothing to be proud of and that their African origin and history are so shameful and inferior and British history and culture so superior that blacks must have to be beamed and written into British history to feel good about themselves. Even the Stoneage Cheddar Man and the WHG are a greater source of pride according to them than any Subsaharan African. So unless you turn ancient Brits, Romans, even the Tudors and Stuarts into black people, black people can never be uplifted and their self-esteem restored. That people don't see the racism here and how blacks are being belittled and patronized by the BBC and other woke activists disguised as scholars is staggering.




Liberals and wokes appear to believe that black people have nothing to be proud of, that their African origins and history are so terrible and low, and British history and culture are so superior, that blacks must be shined and inscribed into British history to feel good about themselves. According to them, the Stoneage Cheddar Man and the WHG are a larger source of pride than any Subsaharan African. So, unless ancient Brits or Romans are transformed into black people, black people will never be exalted and their self-esteem restored. It's incredible that people don't recognize the racism here, and how blacks are being belittled and patronized by the BBC and other woke activists masquerading as professors. So, what are those liberals saying?



Here is another illustration of how history has been distorted. In a BBC history program for children not only the Cheddar Man but also the Ancient Romans and later Brits are falsely presented as black Africans and forefathers of modern black Brits.


Once again, what those liberal Marxists or liberal leftists are interested in is rewriting history, erasing white people from the foundations of their own nations and histories, and inserting Subsaharan Africans into British history as if they were an integral part of British heritage and contributed significantly to its culture, which they simply did not. Is already known that the Stonehege builders were early European farmers, and the Bell Beakers were not black African people nor related to them, but they don't get credit for it.
Africans aren't being belittled by the BBC it's about rubbing history in the Brits faces.
 
ALL people who comment on skin colour are gender racists........either against Women or Men of the opposite colour of themselves.........that is the answer to these people and why they make these comments

Only a pathetic woke beta male would say something like this, brainwashed naive fool.
 
People who think Stonehenge builders and cheddar man are "black" are monstrously ignorant or liars. Genetically they have nothing to do with sub-saharan Africans. As Maciamo pointed out, the Neolithic farmers had light skin, so I don't even know how they are being confused for "blacks". Even if cheddar man had dark skin, it doesn't make him "black".

I know this has already been expressed, but it serves humanity to repeat it. Because the lies are repeated 100 fold.
 
Btw, how could the WHG survive in a very cold climate without adapting their skin colour for at least 30.000 years? The argument, it was due to their nutrition and lifestyle is not very convincing.
 
It's the problem when people read one news article and think they know everything. The Cheddar Man was reported in British media to have dark skin or black skin (depending on the site), and indeed Mesolithic Western European hunter-gatherers seem to have been dark skinned (with blue eyes). But Stonehenge was built by Neolithic farmers from the Near East, who undeniably had white skin, although probably closer to modern Mediterranean people than modern British people.
He had fair skin. If you read the actual DNA study, that is concluded. Cultural Marxist scum are lying and trying to re-write history but losers who follow these ideologies always implode on themselves anyway in the long run.

Cheddar man had fair skin like the Antlers woman so the depiction here is probably wrong. For the other men, I don't know but I know at least 80-90% of Mesolithic Europeans had darker skin.



F7r00YqbgAEwewl


F7r02iHXIAA9slg
 
Btw, how could the WHG survive in a very cold climate without adapting their skin colour for at least 30.000 years? The argument, it was due to their nutrition and lifestyle is not very convincing.
During most of the Ice Age only the southern half of Europe was inhabited, and not even all of it. Snow reflects sunlight and can cause heavy sunburns as anyone who has been skiing without sunscreen can attest to. That's why the Inuits and Eskimos have developed darker skin over time. Britain was only colonised in the Mesolithic period, just after the Ice Age ended.
 
He had fair skin. If you read the actual DNA study, that is concluded. Cultural Marxist scum are lying and trying to re-write history but losers who follow these ideologies always implode on themselves anyway in the long run.

Cheddar man had fair skin like the Antlers woman so the depiction here is probably wrong. For the other men, I don't know but I know at least 80-90% of Mesolithic Europeans had darker skin.



F7r00YqbgAEwewl

Well, as you are quoting the Natural History Museum, here is what they actually say in their Cheddar Man FAQ:

Natural History Museum said:
We were able to extract enough information from Cheddar Man’s DNA to run it through a forensic tool that predicts differences in the level of skin pigmentation in modern world populations3. The results indicated that Cheddar Man’s skin pigmentation was most likely in one of the two most highly-pigmented of five categories ('dark' or 'dark to black'), and definitely not in the lightest categories.

Anyway it's irrelevant to the topic of this thread as the Cheddar Man lived over 10,000 years ago while Stonehenge was built between 5000 and 4000 years ago, not by Mesolithic WHG by by Neolithic farmers, who definitely had fair skin.
 
During most of the Ice Age only the southern half of Europe was inhabited, and not even all of it. Snow reflects sunlight and can cause heavy sunburns as anyone who has been skiing without sunscreen can attest to. That's why the Inuits and Eskimos have developed darker skin over time. Britain was only colonised in the Mesolithic period, just after the Ice Age ended.

I understand that the WHGs had darker skin than present-day Europeans but they couldn't have been as dark as Cheddar Man. Not even close. The Inuit aren't exactly darker than native Siberian peoples or Native Americans. Doesn't matter how much snow-related sun reflection there is. No one will end up having the skin tone of a Dravidian in a very cold environment.
 
I understand that the WHGs had darker skin than present-day Europeans but they couldn't have been as dark as Cheddar Man. Not even close. The Inuit aren't exactly darker than native Siberian peoples or Native Americans. Doesn't matter how much snow-related sun reflection there is. No one will end up having the skin tone of a Dravidian in a very cold environment.

Cheddar Man was indeed darker than the WHG average. But Cro-Magnons had very dark skin, so skin progressively got lighter over time and Cheddar Man was probably one of the few people who still had relatively dark skin just after the end of the last Ice Age.
 

This thread has been viewed 3443 times.

Back
Top