Thanks for your feedback. My map is based on several historical and linguistic maps of Poland.
This map for example shows the Masurian dialect as being spoken today in what used to be East Prussia. The Kashubian area matches the one on my map.
I am aware of the Goralic and Rusyn dialects in the Carpathians, but their numbers are so small (a few thousands) that I could not include them separately. Keep in mind that the purpose of these maps on Living DNA is to show the percentage of similarity (or presumed inheritance) of an individual with the hundreds of regions in the Old World in the database. It is going to be difficult enough to spot genetic differences between relatively ethnically homogeneous populations like the Poles, so if we go into too much detail from the start, the chances of having wrong results will increase. Note that none of the other Slavic countries have their own project. I insisted that Poland did due to its size and knowing the interest of Poles for population genetics.
This map for example shows the Masurian dialect as being spoken today in what used to be East Prussia. The Kashubian area matches the one on my map.
I am aware of the Goralic and Rusyn dialects in the Carpathians, but their numbers are so small (a few thousands) that I could not include them separately. Keep in mind that the purpose of these maps on Living DNA is to show the percentage of similarity (or presumed inheritance) of an individual with the hundreds of regions in the Old World in the database. It is going to be difficult enough to spot genetic differences between relatively ethnically homogeneous populations like the Poles, so if we go into too much detail from the start, the chances of having wrong results will increase. Note that none of the other Slavic countries have their own project. I insisted that Poland did due to its size and knowing the interest of Poles for population genetics.