iapetoc
Junior Member
By the way my previous post was withheld by the administrators (I guess) for some reason so I would refrain from further posts until it is posted on the thread.
it had happened to me many times,
every minutes drops me and logs off, etc
I don't know what is your problem?
the R1a that exists among Greeks 000 years now?
or the case that all R1a is not Slavic?
(for me it is more possible that I2a is more Thracian than R1a, but until today evidences are showing opposite).
Greeks do not Deny a possible invasion 3000 BC before from Steppes,
But Deny their link and origin from Steppes, cause it is mostly Minor Asian, and return Back.
Greeks do not Deny their connections with Thracians, especially Vrygians Bithini Paeones,
but they deny their connections above Donau,
if that is correct
Sorin Mihai Olteanu, a Romanian linguist and Thracologist, recently proposed that the Thracian (as well as the Dacian) language was a centum language in its earlier period, and developed satem features over time.[15] One of the arguments for this idea is that there are many close cognates between Thracian and Ancient Greek. There are also substratum words in the Romanian language that are cited as evidence of the genetic relationship of the Thracian language to ancient Greek and the Ancient Macedonian language (the extinct language or Greek dialect of ancient Macedon). The Greek language itself may be grouped with the Phrygian language and Armenian language, both of which have been grouped with Thracian in the past.
Then indeed south Slavic is Medieval imported, and Georgiev is wrong.
then Greeks build colonies in Taurica cause they had simmilar Linguistic,
the known thracian vocabulary as written by Greek Thrakologists is giving enough pre-slavic elements, but also words that do not exist in South Slavic (no similar roots)