Immigration UK's Cameron says immigration ?unacceptably high?


^ lynx ^

UK?s Cameron says immigration ?unacceptably high?
November 22, 2010

Cameron revealed that the UK was seeing two million new immigrants per decade. ? Reuters pic
LONDON, Nov 22 ? Immigration to Britain is ?unacceptably high? and must be brought down, but this can be done while ensuring businesses can import talent, British Prime Minister David Cameron said in remarks aired yesterday.

He spoke a few days after the state Migration Advisory Committee, charged with setting limits for skilled migrants, said the number of skilled workers from outside the European Union allowed into Britain should be cut by up to a quarter.

?Over recent years we?ve had net immigration into the UK of about 200,000, that is two million extra people every 10 years,? Cameron told Sky News in an interview shown on Sunday.

?That is unacceptably high and has got to be brought down, and I?m quite convinced that it?s possible to bring it down while making sure that business can access talent,? he added.

Businesses are concerned that the plans could harm British competitiveness, and Business Secretary Vince Cable has tried to reassure firms that new immigration curbs planned by the government will be flexible.

Cameron said he wanted net immigration to Britain to be in the tens of thousands, rather than hundreds of thousands, adding that popular support for tackling immigration was one of the reasons his right-leaning Conservative party was elected.

Some among the Liberal Democrats, the junior partner in the coalition government, are uncomfortable with the proposed cap.

A permanent cap on migrants from outside the European Union will be set in April next year, and in the meantime the government has introduced interim measures to avoid a rush of last-minute visa applications while old rules still apply.

Some 196,000 more people migrated to Britain than left the country in 2009, according to official statistics. ? Reuters

Yeah I agree that open immigration can lead to some problems with unemployment, and there should be an orderly sytem in place that can regulate what areas can handle a certain number on a given year and its first come first serve.

This thread has been viewed 197 times.