DejaVu
Regular Member
- Messages
- 573
- Reaction score
- 42
- Points
- 0
http://demokratbloggen.blogspot.se/2015/08/fn-lagger-sig-i-dansk-asylpolitik.html
We should not forget when NATO bombed Serbia to pieces by a UN decision, for that Serbia wanted to achieve a repatriation of Moslems from Albania.
Now, add the UN in Denmark's internal affairs and claims that the Danish proposal to reduce contributions to the colonizers would violate some kind Refugee Convention:
And now mixes also the United Nations by UNHCR UNHCR in the debate. If parliament said yes to the proposal means that Denmark clearly violates the UN Refugee Convention of 1951 and treats differently and discriminate, hitting UN agency established in a comment to the Danish government, said DR Nyheder. (Contemporaries)
That in other words, in this case mean that the UN take the fight against democracy in the world, for democracy to work, it requires a united people within the controlled borders, and that in turn means that the native people must take priority over colonists not Denmark have asked for.
If such Refugee Convention is in conflict with democracy, so democracy must be given priority, but it apparently did not think the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, so what do they do about it? Should it be American B-52s and start bombing Denmark to pieces?
After World War II reorganized the League of Nations (NF) to the United Nations (UN) on the grounds that the NF had acted in an anti-democratic way. Today we are again. High-level officials at the UN headquarters have formed an upper class that determines that we will have a new anti-democratic world order in which free nations no longer have to be free, and that the peoples of the respective countries to become slaves to the new "Aryans", the black and colored new Aryan - svartarierna!
Dansk Folkeparti, DF, parts Inger Støjbergs view that the future reduced payments to asylum seekers does not violate the UN Refugee Convention. But even if they could be, Martin Henriksen, the party's leader in the integration issues, no problems with it.
- We think not mean that international agencies should decide which immigration policy we are in Denmark, he says to news agency Ritzau.
Sure it is! Not a fan UN can argue against democracy, even if they do try. It was easier to bomb a country repatriating unwelcome colonizers than a country that allows them to live there but lowers their contribution to the temptation to Denmark will be less.
According to him, it is not enough to lower contributions to stem the tide of refugees and asylum seekers. Denmark should even go a few steps further, he says, and glances at Australia, which has also signed the Refugee Convention.
- But this has been introduced in the asylum state for those who spontaneously seeking asylum. So there is room for us to introduce further tightening, he said.
Maybe it's time to remind about this video again, showing the total futility of receiving a single immigrant to:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=356&v=6EFmsgEmozg
We should not forget when NATO bombed Serbia to pieces by a UN decision, for that Serbia wanted to achieve a repatriation of Moslems from Albania.
Now, add the UN in Denmark's internal affairs and claims that the Danish proposal to reduce contributions to the colonizers would violate some kind Refugee Convention:
And now mixes also the United Nations by UNHCR UNHCR in the debate. If parliament said yes to the proposal means that Denmark clearly violates the UN Refugee Convention of 1951 and treats differently and discriminate, hitting UN agency established in a comment to the Danish government, said DR Nyheder. (Contemporaries)
That in other words, in this case mean that the UN take the fight against democracy in the world, for democracy to work, it requires a united people within the controlled borders, and that in turn means that the native people must take priority over colonists not Denmark have asked for.
If such Refugee Convention is in conflict with democracy, so democracy must be given priority, but it apparently did not think the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, so what do they do about it? Should it be American B-52s and start bombing Denmark to pieces?
After World War II reorganized the League of Nations (NF) to the United Nations (UN) on the grounds that the NF had acted in an anti-democratic way. Today we are again. High-level officials at the UN headquarters have formed an upper class that determines that we will have a new anti-democratic world order in which free nations no longer have to be free, and that the peoples of the respective countries to become slaves to the new "Aryans", the black and colored new Aryan - svartarierna!
Dansk Folkeparti, DF, parts Inger Støjbergs view that the future reduced payments to asylum seekers does not violate the UN Refugee Convention. But even if they could be, Martin Henriksen, the party's leader in the integration issues, no problems with it.
- We think not mean that international agencies should decide which immigration policy we are in Denmark, he says to news agency Ritzau.
Sure it is! Not a fan UN can argue against democracy, even if they do try. It was easier to bomb a country repatriating unwelcome colonizers than a country that allows them to live there but lowers their contribution to the temptation to Denmark will be less.
According to him, it is not enough to lower contributions to stem the tide of refugees and asylum seekers. Denmark should even go a few steps further, he says, and glances at Australia, which has also signed the Refugee Convention.
- But this has been introduced in the asylum state for those who spontaneously seeking asylum. So there is room for us to introduce further tightening, he said.
Maybe it's time to remind about this video again, showing the total futility of receiving a single immigrant to:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=356&v=6EFmsgEmozg
