G25 Vahaduo - Unscaled Phenotype Feiichy G25 Calculator

Stuvanè

Regular Member
Messages
603
Reaction score
591
Points
93
Location
Milan
Ethnic group
Italian
Y-DNA haplogroup
J2
mtDNA haplogroup
H1e
Just for fun :LOL:


A new Vahaduo calculator (based on the unscaled G25 coordinates), that estimates the autosomal distances (and also mixtures) in relation to various human phenotypes:

http://g25vahaduo.genetics.ovh/Unscaled_Feiichy_G25_Phenotype_calculator.htm

Check also the following list

http://www.humanphenotypes.net/list.html

My results


87141722_3031494893580085_2933952040331640832_n.png


87265817_233940367771810_3251245760095715328_n.png
 
Distance to:Torzio
0.02445400Dinarid
0.02465312Aegean-Med
0.02544108Pontid
0.02696412Noric
0.02768999Atlanto-Med
0.02790273Alpine
0.03490115North_Atlantid
0.03543064Keltic_Nordic
0.03544721Faelid
0.03738291Nordic
0.03921603Brunn
0.04099521Trønder
0.04606418Caspid
0.04742339Turanid
0.04908109Assyroid
0.05031691Neo-Danubian
0.05198217Iranid
0.05239673East_Baltic
0.05455648North_Pontid
0.05467138Polynesid
0.05508758Armenid
0.05605165Gracile_Med
0.05763726Pamirid
0.05893216Mtebid
0.06145111Irano-Afghan


Target: Torzio
Distance: 1.5548% / 0.01554840 | ADC: 0.25x
40.6Aegean-Med
30.4Keltic_Nordic
13.8Dinarid
7.4Gracile_Med
5.0Atlanto-Med
2.2Neo-Danubian
0.6Uralid


Target: Torzio
Distance: 1.7636% / 0.01763646 | ADC: 1x
35.2Aegean-Med
29.0Atlanto-Med
21.2Dinarid
14.6Noric



Target: Torzio
Distance: 2.0084% / 0.02008431 | ADC: 2x
53.8Dinarid
28.0Aegean-Med
18.2Atlanto-Med
 
I assume keltoi-nordic is an error and it should be Keltoi-noric
Nordic = scandinavia
Noric = austria
 
Eurafricanid (Atlanto-Med) in 0.25 and 0.5 :LOL:

Target: Juan
Distance: 1.9977% / 0.01997722 | ADC: 0.5x

92.0Atlanto-Med
4.6Dinarid
2.6Gracile_Med
0.8Gracile_Indid


Target: Juan
Distance: 1.8761% / 0.01876058 | ADC: 0.25x

74.2Atlanto-Med
11.8Gracile_Med
4.2Gracile_Indid
3.8Dinarid
2.6Brunn
2.6Uralid
0.8Saharid


Target: Juan
Distance: 1.7644% / 0.01764444

40.8Gracile_Med
40.4Brunn
5.6Gracile_Indid
5.6Saharid
4.0Uralid
2.8Berberid
0.6Bantuid.
0.2Silvid

Distance to:Juan
0.02064511Atlanto-Med
0.02824270Alpine
0.03788026Dinarid
0.03837797Noric
0.03906417North_Atlantid
0.03935345Aegean-Med
0.03991486Keltic_Nordic
0.04027980Pontid
0.04117616Faelid
0.04160321Brunn
0.04514379Trønder
0.04523229Nordic
0.04566498Gracile_Med
0.05757812Turanid
0.05892987Polynesid
0.05937756Caspid
0.06218699Berberid
0.06218699Saharid
0.06221967Assyroid
0.06490953East_Baltic
0.06518354Iranid
0.06597399Neo-Danubian
0.06606062Armenid
0.06623051North_Pontid
0.06869721Pamirid
 
Indeed....... ALL Dutch are Faelid and all Swedes Nordic.....nonsens packed in vahaduo ;)

Regarding Europe all you can say is that on AVERAGE in GENERAL the more North the more people are becoming larger, more robust (/less gracile) and lighter featured.

In this all variations are possible. I'm 6 feet 4 but my grand uncle was to small for military service. I have a Bell Beaker kind of steephead but not all family members have that. I have gold blond hair/ touch of red in it (meanwhile somewhat darkened) but with chestnut eyes.....etc etc etc
 
Last edited:
In the end it's a toy that works like another G25 calculator (maybe with a little patience you can also find which one). The ancestral peoples/groups have been attributed in a somewhat simplified or arbitrary way the various phenotypes, and the game is done. Everything to take with a pinch of salt [emoji16][emoji6]

Sent from my SM-J730F using Eupedia Forum mobile app
 
In the end it's a toy that works like another G25 calculator (maybe with a little patience you can also find which one). The ancestral peoples/groups have been attributed in a somewhat simplified or arbitrary way the various phenotypes, and the game is done. Everything to take with a pinch of salt [emoji16][emoji6]

Sent from my SM-J730F using Eupedia Forum mobile app

Of course with salt Struvane, but I saw some postings on Apricity from the developer of this whole....seems to take it very serious.

And could everybody see right trough this all?

For example the Oera Linda book, written as a gimmick until Heinrich Himmler c.s. took it serious.....

But of course we are miles away from that! ;)
 
Last edited:
It's a nonsense tool!
I wonder on what basis they measure distances between phenotypes? We can try to find out kinship of phenotypes but it seems to me very hard to decide of a useful hyerarchy among traits, quantifiable. Very often, here, metrics can even obscurate things (let's took brachycephaly, BI).

@Northerner: No, more northern doesn't correspond to more robust, even if as a whole a lot of body measures are larger.
Maybe in types, in North, gracile ones are a bit less fracile, and "robust" types are a bit more "robust"; but not only between individuals but also between regions, there are some visible variations not tied to latitude.The same in pigmentation (an ancient pigmentation levelling based on selection depending on milieu has been unlevelled" (glup!) by recent enough crossings and a future levelling is not already occurred).
 
@MOESAN
It is for fun:)

BTW you can check your phenotype confidence score using this Microsoft tool.



Open https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/cognitive-services/face/#demo

and click "Face verification", than upload real image (frontal view) and phenotype image (or use its URL) and wait few seconds for confidence score. If it is 0.10 or less it means no or weak similarity. This posted below is very high.
48k0nHZ.png
 
With my father I take 0.33 with my mother 0.19 among other relatives I get to put Santa Teresita de Lissieux and I get 0.09
I have pixelated my image because I am very discreet.

carlosSantaTERESITApixelado.JPEG
 
@MOESAN
It is for fun:)

BTW you can check your phenotype confidence score using this Microsoft tool.



Open https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/cognitive-services/face/#demo

and click "Face verification", than upload real image (frontal view) and phenotype image (or use its URL) and wait few seconds for confidence score. If it is 0.10 or less it means no or weak similarity. This posted below is very high.
48k0nHZ.png

Nice tool Lukasz!!!

And based on the tool I think the vahaduo fails in my case. My results on vahaduo with on the right side the microsoft/photo tool results.

0.01162039 Nordic 0.09017
0.01230389 Faelid 0.0863
0.01392460 Trønder 0.09633
0.01399012 North_Atlantid 0.09531
0.01538018 Keltic_Nordic 0.09498
0.01667625 Brunn 0.08567
0.02460925 Noric 0.09993
0.02922024 Alpine 0.08863
0.03908280 Atlanto-Med
0.04032854 East_Baltic
0.04130012 North_Pontid
0.04236143 Pontid
0.04793545 Neo-Danubian
0.04848525 Dinarid 0.1013
0.05117455 Aegean-Med
0.05121845 Polynesid
0.05278150 Turanid
0.05369542 Pamirid
0.06054545 Caspid
0.06149485 Mtebid
0.06195293 Irano-Afghan
0.06324044 Iranid
0.06575030 Nord_Indid
0.06713569 Assyroid
0.07093749 Armenid 0.09651

Dinarid is also seen as the Bell Beaker phenotype and is number 1 (the only one above 0,10). Number 2 is the Norid phenotype, that's also connected to Dinarid.

And as you can see the number 1 an 2 in vahaduo Nordid and Faelid are in the photo tool even beyond the result most on distance the Armenid!

The vahaduo tool 'could be saved by the bell' (tough not really because it's all too off road) because I'm convinced that when Anglo-Saxons G25 is added then....it gets very close to my photo tool number 3: Anglo-Saxon Confidence is 0.09844 (almost 0.10).

0.01148121 Anglo_Saxon
0.01162039 Nordic
0.01230389 Faelid
0.01392460 Trønder
0.01399012 North_Atlantid
0.01538018 Keltic_Nordic
0.01667625 Brunn
 
Last edited:
Distance to:Dibran
0.02139280Dinarid
0.02760827Pontid
0.02813426Aegean-Med
0.03811666Alpine
0.04000273Noric
0.04511651Atlanto-Med
0.04863858Assyroid
0.04979679Caspid
0.05048222Armenid
0.05289730Gracile_Med
0.05289811North_Pontid
0.05492586Turanid
0.05527277Faelid
0.05552702North_Atlantid
0.05633641Iranid
0.05690880Nordic
0.05835633Trønder
0.05874502Keltic_Nordic
0.06039559Brunn
0.06048533Neo-Danubian
0.06384568Mtebid
0.06485987East_Baltic
0.06524424Pamirid
0.06543669Polynesid
0.06855493Irano-Afghan



Target: Dibran
Distance: 1.9955% / 0.01995536

65.6Dinarid
17.2Gracile_Med
10.6North_Pontid
6.4Armenid
0.2Bambutid
 
According to that Microsoft tool, I look more like my maternal grandfather (0.12) than my paternal grandfather (0.08)
 
It's a nonsense tool!
I wonder on what basis they measure distances between phenotypes? We can try to find out kinship of phenotypes but it seems to me very hard to decide of a useful hyerarchy among traits, quantifiable. Very often, here, metrics can even obscurate things (let's took brachycephaly, BI).

@Northerner: No, more northern doesn't correspond to more robust, even if as a whole a lot of body measures are larger.
Maybe in types, in North, gracile ones are a bit less fracile, and "robust" types are a bit more "robust"; but not only between individuals but also between regions, there are some visible variations not tied to latitude.The same in pigmentation (an ancient pigmentation levelling based on selection depending on milieu has been unlevelled" (glup!) by recent enough crossings and a future levelling is not already occurred).


See my "Dinaric" results (previous posting) Moesan!

This is wat Coon said about some outmost NW Germans that equals NE Dutch:

mr0d2fiaw70i.29.41.png




Do you have any thought about this? It's appreciated!
 
BISABUELOpaternoALFOLD.JPEG

0.10036
BisabuelopaternoGracieleIndid.jpeg

0.11484
bisabueloPaternoEastBrachid.jpeg
0.10087

These are the three best results for my paternal great grandfather all the others are 0.0


What yellow eyes is true our brown with light you can see yellowish orange or yellow whether or not central heterochromia.


My great-grandfather was also E-V22 so I will now see the results of my grandfather in case they indicate a route from Egypt that could be consistent with after the results of his son, my great-grandfather perhaps through Arabia, Turkey, Iran, Irak or something like that, now I don't have the map in front of me

7. Proto Thracian/Illyrian Vucedol (2775 BC) ..... 10.09 - I3499
11. Illyrian / Dalmatian (1200 BC) ..... 10.75 - I3313
23. Vatya Bronze Age Hungary (1750 BC) ..... 12.12 - Rise483
28. Bronze Age Vatya Pannonia (1600 BC) ..... 12.36 - Rise480
53. Illyrian / Dalmatian (1600 BC) ..... 14.25 - I4332
56. Scythian Southern Moldova (290 BC) ..... 14.28 - scy197b
71. Thraco-Cimmerian Black Sea (900 BC) ..... 14.67 - MJ12
77. Scythian Southern Moldova (290 BC) ..... 14.87 - scy305 -

81. Scythian Southern Moldova (270 BC) ..... 15.08 - scy192 -
89. Scythian Moldova (290 BC) ..... 15.66 - scy311 -
115. Scythian Southern Moldova (290 BC) ..... 16.78 - scy304
150. Scythian Outlier Hungary (550 BC) ..... 18.52 - DA195
165. Hungary Elite Avar Kiskoros-Vaghohid (690 AD) ..... 18.96
172. Vatya Bronze Age Hungary (1750 BC) ..... 19.28 - Rise484
173. Medieval Hungary / Balkan (1244 AD) ..... 19.38 - DA199

I have compiled the samples of my results as well as that they sounded a little bit like Hungarian or the surrounding area a little around without having to be like in the epicenter but being.
 
Last edited:
I get 0.22 for Paleo-Atlantid, which given the map they give that is where most of my ancestors come from, where the Paleo-Atlantid type dominates.
 
BISABUELOpaternoALFOLD.JPEG

0.10036
BisabuelopaternoGracieleIndid.jpeg

0.11484
bisabueloPaternoEastBrachid.jpeg
0.10087

These are the three best results for my paternal great grandfather all the others are 0.0


What yellow eyes is true our brown with light you can see yellowish orange or yellow whether or not central heterochromia.


My great-grandfather was also E-V22 so I will now see the results of my grandfather in case they indicate a route from Egypt that could be consistent with after the results of his son, my great-grandfather perhaps through Arabia, Turkey, Iran, Irak or something like that, now I don't have the map in front of me

7. Proto Thracian/Illyrian Vucedol (2775 BC) ..... 10.09 - I3499
11. Illyrian / Dalmatian (1200 BC) ..... 10.75 - I3313
23. Vatya Bronze Age Hungary (1750 BC) ..... 12.12 - Rise483
28. Bronze Age Vatya Pannonia (1600 BC) ..... 12.36 - Rise480
53. Illyrian / Dalmatian (1600 BC) ..... 14.25 - I4332
56. Scythian Southern Moldova (290 BC) ..... 14.28 - scy197b
71. Thraco-Cimmerian Black Sea (900 BC) ..... 14.67 - MJ12
77. Scythian Southern Moldova (290 BC) ..... 14.87 - scy305 -

81. Scythian Southern Moldova (270 BC) ..... 15.08 - scy192 -
89. Scythian Moldova (290 BC) ..... 15.66 - scy311 -
115. Scythian Southern Moldova (290 BC) ..... 16.78 - scy304
150. Scythian Outlier Hungary (550 BC) ..... 18.52 - DA195
165. Hungary Elite Avar Kiskoros-Vaghohid (690 AD) ..... 18.96
172. Vatya Bronze Age Hungary (1750 BC) ..... 19.28 - Rise484
173. Medieval Hungary / Balkan (1244 AD) ..... 19.38 - DA199

I have compiled the samples of my results as well as that they sounded a little bit like Hungarian or the surrounding area a little around without having to be like in the epicenter but being.

My paternal grandfather, son of the former. The rest of the results with 0`0 ... e.t.c. If not for the program that has given this result, I would have thought that my grandfather looked like this man like an egg looks like a broccoli

AbueloDiegoYemenid.jpeg

0.12425

My father, son of the previous one. The rest of the results are 0.0 ... e.t.c.

papaStrandid.jpeg

0.10906

Carlos
CarlosCarpathid.jpeg

0.25394

CarlosmTEBIDResultados.jpeg

0.23282

TODA (Not fund)0.11951

CarlosBorrey.jpeg

0.10107

CarlosIndoIranid.jpeg

0.10104

They would also be: Gracile Mediterranean, Moorish, NorAtlhantic all with 0.1 ...
Some may be complementary noise of some previous result and others by maternal route, so I will do the exercise with the maternal part soon.


My first impression is a trip of my E-V22 very different from the predictable from the Phoenician by boat to Andalusia, too direct and easy, no, that goes, and mainly by land. Anyway I will compare other ancestors from both sides to see their results. It's a lot of work and it could take even a few days. If the program already had all those photographs in its database it would be very fast.
 
My paternal grandfather, son of the former. The rest of the results with 0`0 ... e.t.c. If not for the program that has given this result, I would have thought that my grandfather looked like this man like an egg looks like a broccoli

AbueloDiegoYemenid.jpeg

0.12425

My father, son of the previous one. The rest of the results are 0.0 ... e.t.c.

papaStrandid.jpeg

0.10906

Carlos
CarlosCarpathid.jpeg

0.25394

CarlosmTEBIDResultados.jpeg

0.23282

TODA (Not fund)0.11951

CarlosBorrey.jpeg

0.10107

CarlosIndoIranid.jpeg

0.10104

They would also be: Gracile Mediterranean, Moorish, NorAtlhantic all with 0.1 ...
Some may be complementary noise of some previous result and others by maternal route, so I will do the exercise with the maternal part soon.


My first impression is a trip of my E-V22 very different from the predictable from the Phoenician by boat to Andalusia, too direct and easy, no, that goes, and mainly by land. Anyway I will compare other ancestors from both sides to see their results. It's a lot of work and it could take even a few days. If the program already had all those photographs in its database it would be very fast.

Wow Carlos that's really a lot of differentiation!

I guess phenotype is a matter of auDNA and not Y-DNA, Y-DNA doen't have much effect on the appearance, at least not that I'm aware of.........
 
^^
Yes, the phenotypes are not important, but perhaps the measures or forms of the watermelon or where it has gone and with whom it has been mixed since if it is a man who has made a route from Egypt and these heads come out we also You can talk about which women have been mixed so that the DNA of them has been changing the heads of the descendants of that man, the phenotypes are pure makeup but the bones, volumes and measures may be somewhat more forceful or more clues.
 

This thread has been viewed 26153 times.

Back
Top