@Yetos I’m Ok with Term Limits.
I’m Not OK for Banishment and Deportation of the opposition.
If I misunderstood “Apelasis” disregard my second paragraph.
Ostracism happened limited times per year,
in light form was just forbiden to talk and take part to κοινα to commons, consider forbid to take part in political life for 2-4 years,
in the hard form it is exile, or a narrow acces area, guarded but not prisoned, for time from 2 years to at least 1 presidential or parliamental time,
different degrees to a number according the population, or parliament etc etc
people should choose from a common list,
and not by different lists,
it is usefull when the elected goverment thinks, or tries to 'cross the Rubicon' of descent political life.
do not warry,
the idea is an idea,
at Turkey Demirtas party was elected although he was in prison,
and above the very 'tall' step of 10% which leads to parliament.
We vote the ideas and the 'healthy minds' and what is correct by our opininion for us and state,
not the persons,
On contradictory we must 'punish' the persons who pass the meter,
or ambush the state, or earn by politics when state is driven to pay.
as demagogues, preverts, money vultures, etc.
without Ostracism, most democracies are doomed.
Rome started as Sparta. Glory to the defender, and equal rights to Romans. Senatum
but there were eras that a politician earn more than the whole state,
so he could buy votes by a bucket of grain.
that led to absolute monarchy,
no one must earn more than emperror,
or the one who gains most becomes emperror
Salento think,
the latest episode after the Italian elections,
Should someone lost his powers and replaced, or Not?
Giving Ostracism to the people,
we give true power to the people.
