did the new C14 dates of the central/south Asian paper come out ?
How did Davidski @eurogenes explain the Hajji Fairuz R1b ? he claimed that the C14 dating must be wrong and the archaeological context is definitely not Chalcolithic but bronze age, without proof, and
then went on to use his Global25/nMonte and produced Steppe results.
all Iran Chalcolithic samples (seh gabi, hajji fairuz, tepe hissar) contain additional EHG that was not present in Iran Neolithic, we know that since Lazaridis et al (2016), the paper's qpAdm modelling did produce that for all samples not just the R1b guy, and it was quite minor, 4% and 5% in Hajji Fairuz, which is expected for the Chalcolithic .. and most importantly, the R1b wasn't an outlier, he was genetically similar to Chalcolithic individuals nearby.
P | Prop1 | Prop2 | Prop3 | Err1 | Err2 | Err3 | Source1 | Source2 | Source3 |
0.03 | 0.52 | 0.48 | NA | 0.02 | 0.02 | NA | Ganj_Dareh_N | Anatolia_N | NA |
0.90 | 0.07 | 0.61 | 0.32 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.06 | Iron_Gates_HG | Ganj_Dareh_N | Anatolia_N |
0.62 | 0.04 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | Karelia_HG | Ganj_Dareh_N | Anatolia_N |
0.58 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | Ganj_Dareh_N | Anatolia_N | West_Siberia_N |
these are for Hajji Fairuz samples, the other locations are also modelled in the paper having extremely small amounts of EHG.
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2018/04/likely-yamnaya-incursions-into.html
and this is from the comment section:
How much more EHG do modern Iranians have ? is it the same levels as in the Chalcolithic ?