You are so obsessed on this part, it's beyond my understanding why, it looks you hold an agenda. So, that's why you claim Enchelei and Taulanti came from Budva, Montenegro quite late despite not having any kind of factual evidence.
Enchelei were at their peak of power during Early Iron Age and they even probably conquered Iron Age ancestors of Ancient Macedonians, Northern Greek tribes were probably paying them tribute, during Middle Iron Age Enchelei started to become more like a past of themselves, and Northern Illyrian Glasinac-Mat related tribes became more powerful like (Autariate, Ardiae). They were Southern Illyrian tribe, it is probably some of their spinoff group Pirusti who might have migrated more North near Lake Shkodra during Late Iron Age and you seem to completely over-turn the facts.
Now, back at Taulanti, i think from the few material i have read, they were native people of Dyrrachium and nearby, Greek colonizers encountered them there. It's something i don't understand, why the Illyrian tribes didn't conquer these colonizers, but probably they were paying them heavy tributes for protection and leaving them alone.
There were more Illyrian tribes bordering Epirotans down there. And yes, i am of the opinion that Epirotans were not Illyrian, nowhere in classical records anyone writes that, it's likely that Epirotans were some specific group of people, not related to Illyrians or Greeks but who latter became heavily influenced by Hellenic culture and were assimilated into this culture.
No doubt there were Greek cities in coastal Albania, but Illyrians, or cultures related to Illyrians based on material culture (the specific tumuli burial rite of Illyrian variety) scratched down to South Albania and North Epirus. It's how deep south their cultural influences scratched and probably even the language itself. Whether you like it or not.
