Alan RAUDE (a Breton) thinks the term Brittia applied to Northern Britain (Procopus de Cesarea (565 AD) discribed Britain as compound of two islands, Britannia, in front of Spain, and Brittia, in front of the Rhine mouth ; in his mind, Brittia was peopled by Angilot, Frissones and Britones (Angles, Frisians and Brittons); RAUDE cites some namings evolution by time, according to ancient historians : Britanni was the name of Britain inhabitants for Caesar and Tacitus, and Gildas, but already some legions contained the term Brittones (Flavia Brittonum, Aurelia Brittonum, Brittones Caledonense…) side by side with Britanni (Cohors III Britannorum, (Ala I Britannica) … Gildas wrote an name Brittana around 545 AD, and it seems a « crossing » between Britannia and Brittonia. Since the end of the 4th century, everytime that Brittones are localized, it’s in Northern Britain.
It seems Britannia could already be a latin « mix » of Pretania (see the Cruithni in Northern Ireland) ; Brittia could be a latinization of a name containing a root *brikt cognate with *brîkt, both meaning « speckled », « motted », which gave Breton brizh and Welsh brith/braith with the same meaning plus « multi-coloured » ; the /britt-/ could be the reflex of Brittonic */brijt/*/briçt/ which became /bri[FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]θ[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]/ ; do notice the words : Breton [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]brezhell [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]« mackerel », Welsh [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]brithyll [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]« perch », speckled fishes, and Breton [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]brech[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif], Welsh [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]brech[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif], both « irruption », « nettle rash » and other dseases affecting skin ; and do notice that ancient [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]*-tt[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif] , [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]*-kt [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]and [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]*-pt [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]all of them gave [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]-(i)th [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]and -[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif](i)zh[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif] in Welsh and Breton -[/FONT]
[FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]so the Northern Pretani would have had a specific name formed on [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]britt- (brikt-)[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif] with this meaning of « speckled », « motted » which could express the fact they were tattoed ; it could very well be convenient for the « oldest » or most traditional tribes of North Britain which became the basis of the future [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]Picts[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif] who were tattoed.[/FONT]
[FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]& : Brittany is [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]Breizh [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]in Breton, on the same root (with short /i/) and it is of some worth to know that the most of the nobility who made the bulk of these migrants w[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]ould have been[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif] [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]Cornish[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]men[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif] of those times, it’s to say the Northern ones, [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]and also people from[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif] Stratclud in South Central Scotland ; (in fact [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]Cornovi[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif] were found in more than a place, among them North-East to Wales [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]- [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]Cheshire/ Lancahire [/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif]-[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif] and even Caithness in farthest Northern Scotland ; this group of tribes was allied to Rome and furnished troops to the Empire, if what I red is true[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif])[/FONT][FONT=Liberation Serif, serif].[/FONT]