• Don't want to see ads? Install an adblocker like uBlock Origin or use a Europe-based privacy-friendly browser like Vivaldi or Mullvad.

Religion Why is Polygamy a christian taboo?

Zauriel

The Angel of Justice
Messages
121
Reaction score
22
Points
0
Location
Northeast Greenhills, San Juan, Manila, Philippine
Ethnic group
Chinese
Why is polygamy considered a sin in Christianity's eyes when the prophets of
God have many wives?

Abraham, the first Hebrew, and ancestor of all Israel, had three wives, namely Sarah and her servant Hagar (see Genesis 16:3),and Keturah, as well as a number of concubines (Genesis 25:6).

Esau, Abraham's grandson, had three wives - Judith, Bashemath (Genesis 26:34) and Mahalath (Genesis 28:9)

Jacob, father of the twelve tribes of Israel had Rachel and Leah, who were sisters, as his wives, see Genesis 29, and their servants Bilhah and Zilpah in Genesis 30. Without these four wives there would be no Israel.

Gideon, mighty man of God and judge of Israel, who defeated the Midianites, and whose name is now used to distribute Bibles worldwide, had 70 sons, "for he had many wives" - Judges 8:30

In 1 Samuel 1:2 Elkanah has two wives, Hannah and Peninah. Hannah gives birth to the prophet Samuel.

In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of women without any limits to how many he can marry.

In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David had six wives and numerous concubines.

In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines.

In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had 18 wives and 60 concubines.

In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
 
[3] The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?
[4] And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,
[5] And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
[6] Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
[7] They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?
[8] He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.
[9] And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.
 
More relevant to the question than Hebrew precedents would be the social norms of the ancient Greco-Roman world, from which and in which Christianity developed and grew.
 
I do not recall a passage that prohibits polygamy in the bible. :?
Isn't it a modern law that prohibits polygamy?
 
ralian said:
I do not recall a passage that prohibits polygamy in the bible.

Hence my point about the norms of Greco-Roman society being more relevant to answering the question than are Hebrew precedents, even though it would seem to be counterintuitive since Christianity has its origins in Judaism.
 
Can I happily say that what they told me was to obey the new testament, not the old... wait a minute. That means that the ten commandments will not be listened apon and we will be killing each other.
How about polandry (a lady marring more than one man)? Doe that still happen?
I know it is highly known in the Islamic land, but that's it.
 
The norm in the world is a man being married to one woman, a condition known as "monotony".
 
The bible/testaments are full of contradictions between the different times they have been written... some people just don't seem to be able to connect the dots...
 
TwistedMac said:
The bible/testaments are full of contradictions between the different times they have been written... some people just don't seem to be able to connect the dots...
If they connect the dots they start to see things that they don't like, so they ignore them, or try to explain them with pseudo science and really dodgey history.
 
Which 'Christians'?

Well... If you mean 'Christians' as in Roman Catholic Christians, then it's a taboo probably because Rome said it so. And of course, Rome is in the same party as the people who made legal laws around the world today.

Other 'Christians' as in the followers of Jesus each have different views regarding polygamy depending on their affiliation, but all (provided that they follow Jesus) would agree that Jesus never banned polygamy.


It should also be noted that much in the same way Jesus never put a ban on polygamy, Jesus also never lifted any of the bans imposed during the times of Moses. That mean that it's not right for followers of Jesus (if they follow what he teached in the Israel / Judean kingdom area) to chow down on pigs, ostriches, and so on, it's just NOT kosher!



As for polygamy, polyandry, polygyny, and other multiple marriages stuff, it's explained here:

http://www.wordsources.info/words-mod-polygamyPt1.html



As for polyandry.

Well... It would be kinda hard for two or more boys owning the same toy.

Sure that they can share the time they play with it and even play it together, but to own it together?

How many fights do you see when two boys try to own the same toy together? Remember, own, not shared.

On the other hand, boys loves to have many toys. And of course, some boys sometimes treat their toys better some husbands treat their wives.

Of course with toys sharing the same boy. Well... We know the story of "Toy Story". Toys can get along with the same boy, provided that they know that it's their purporse in life to make a child happy, but some advocates of 'Toy's rights' probably wouldn't agree with Woody and Buzz's way of life.


Playing a game console using the same memory card and saved files would also begged the question on... who done what in the game? It would be fine though as long that no one argue over the whole thing, that what is important is the enjoyment and the result of playing the game.


As for one boy with only one toy rule. Well... As it already being said, it's a monotony, and probably will lead to many toys without any child to play them. Probably one of the reasons on why men have relationship with women other than their wives, even without their wives' consent.

Now to make a boy with only one toy rule as the legal laws around the world today, obviously someone out there is trying to make the humandkind crazy.



As for the Qur'an and Polyandry.

Hmmm... I don't remember anything in the Qur'an that forbid polyandry.
 
mikecash said:
The norm in the world is a man being married to one woman, a condition known as "monotony".

LOL@Mike Cash ;oD No one noticed I think!

If I were going to give my personal opinion here, I'd say that men wised up and realized they couldn't handle more than one woman. But the Bible says in this passage, Genesis 2:22-24, that God made Eve out of a rib from Adam and then goes on to say that for this reason man shall leave his parents and unite with his wife and they shall be one flesh.

God's perfect plan was that man only have one wife. Man + wife + wife x 10 does not equal ONE flesh. God ALLOWED man to take more than one wife just as He ALLOWED them to divorce. It was NOT His perfect way however.
 
The prime advantage monogamy has over polygamy is that one never need face being nagged in shifts.
 
The way this thread has gone just proves that you gents need us around to keep you in check! The real reason polygamy happened was that it takes a lot of women to make you behave. Polyandry was never common because most of us have enough on our plate coping with one man. And any man who thinks it fitting to use 'toys' as an analogy for women, even in jest, should consider himself lucky that he is capable of any kind of relationship with the opposite sex ;).
 
MikeCash said:
The norm in the world is a man being married to one woman, a condition known as "monotony".
MikeCash said:
The prime advantage monogamy has over polygamy is that one never need face being nagged in shifts.
:D :D :D :D :D :giggle:
 
Back
Top