That is very rude. We don't suffer from anything, and if you ask anyone it is usually Albanians that have odd theories.
Many people on this forum and in others have weird theories not just Albanians. I have read some of the posts made by you guys and that supposed Albanian kamani and i must say :useless:. And i am quite tired of you Bosniaks and your complexes with Illyrians. I have seen of how you guys chimp and keep repeating as parrots this Illyrian thing.
Yes I am aware of the Cucuteni-Trypillia, and you should have been more specific regarding "Ukraine" having more subclades than the West Balkans. The Cucuteni-Trypillia was much more concentrated in Romania and Moldova, rather than Ukraine. Did Slavs which passed by this area pick up a lot of people from that area? Probably. Did some of the haplogroup I in the West Balkans come with these Slavs? Probably. But to say that all of it came with them, and that it is a "Slavic" marker is ridiculous. The Cucuteni-Trypillia people were likely a mix of paleolithic people who took up farming and new neolithic migrants from the near east. Their phenotype was similar to that of other people in the Balkans.
My point is that I2a2b(Din) did not come from a far-flung steppe, it has always been in the Balkans. The I haplogroup diversity further justifies my claims, doesn't hurt them. And you aren't at all adressing the differences between South Slavs and other Slavs in terms of appearance.
I am tired of repeating myself. I2a2-Din is 2500 years old according to TMCRA estimates. Most of it came with Slavic invasions. End of point. No need to discuss it further.
I already wrote that R1a wasn't exclusively Slavic, but I explained that it is nonetheless most often found in Slavic populations.
High percentages of R1a are also found among Iranic(Pashtuns and Tajiks) and Indian populations.