Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Never emphasized that I-PH908 is of Serbian origin nor thought about it. What I wrote that I-CTS10228 can be possible Bastarnae origin. And I remember that we had polemics that it could be Thracian, but there are reasons why Bastarnae can be a strong candidate.
Citated Kronsteirn in context. Not spoke that his words are ultimate truth. But it is true that he is scientist, it is not disputable...
It is very interesting, but one mistake what doesn't matter.
Dalmatians = Romanized Illyrians (language Dalmatian, belongs to Italo-Dalmatian)
Istrians = Italic people (language Venetian, belongs to...? thoughts are divided Gallo-Italic, Italo-Dalmatian or solo group)
Where are descendants of Liburnians?
...
Croati = Croats (Hrvati)
No Malocchi, but Morlachus or Murlacus what is from Greek Μαυροβλάχοι, Morlacus = Vlachs (Aromunians), nothing to do neither Serbian nor Albanian (Gjuha Sqipe), maybe Malocchi is mistake or too distorded Greek word.
But I know what you wanted to say, later someone abusively Serbs called Morlachus (Morlaci).
Narentines were unbaptized Serbs (Srbi), Greeks called them Poganoi (pagans).
Objectively we cannot say that continuity existed because arrival of Slavs but it was not completly discontinuity because change of population was not fast, it was very slow process.
Therefore we can say about partial continuity.
By the way what happened with Liburnians, were they speak Dalmatian, Venetian or some other Italo-Romance language.
You are correct , that it the word once I rechecked my information.................Venice used it only for the serbs and also for the serb kingdom of Zeta in modern MontenegroThe actual word is Morlacchi in Italian, Morlaci in Croatian and Serbian, Morlachs in English. Although initially it did, later including the source, has nothing to do with ethnogenesis as with political misinterpretation of the factual reality on the field. Do not open the pandora's box.
After Rome fell, the dalmatians where illyrian plus latin in language ..............later it became italo-dalmatian.It is very interesting, but one mistake what doesn't matter.
Dalmatians = Romanized Illyrians (language Dalmatian, belongs to Italo-Dalmatian)
Istrians = Italic people (language Venetian, belongs to...? thoughts are divided Gallo-Italic, Italo-Dalmatian or solo group)
Where are descendants of Liburnians?
...
Croati = Croats (Hrvati)
No Malocchi, but Morlachus or Murlacus what is from Greek Μαυροβλάχοι, Morlacus = Vlachs (Aromunians), nothing to do neither Serbian nor Albanian (Gjuha Sqipe), maybe Malocchi is mistake or too distorded Greek word.
But I know what you wanted to say, later someone abusively Serbs called Morlachus (Morlaci).
Narentines were unbaptized Serbs (Srbi), Greeks called them Poganoi (pagans).
Objectively we cannot say that continuity existed because arrival of Slavs but it was not completly discontinuity because change of population was not fast, it was very slow process.
Therefore we can say about partial continuity.
By the way what happened with Liburnians, were they speak Dalmatian, Venetian or some other Italo-Romance language.
I never said about Uskok language
You are correct , that it the word once I rechecked my information.................Venice used it only for the serbs and also for the serb kingdom of Zeta in modern Montenegro there where some who thought the morlacchi where the bosnians
After Rome fell, the dalmatians where illyrian plus latin in language ..............later it became italo-dalmatian.
..
Unsure if liburnians became istrians , dalmatians or became the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uskoks
In some Albanian chronicles, during the Ottoman Empire, Serbs and other Slavs are mentioned as Croats.
That's interesting to me, so if you have concrete data link etc...I would be grateful.
Some people think taht I2a is conected with Vlachs, but it is just stereotype, I2a have nothing to do with Vlachs and Alanians.
Vlachs are predominantloy R1b and J2b2 and Albanians are E-V13 and J2b2.
I2a among Vlachs and Albanians is Slavic influence.
I2a in seventh century comes to Greece, Bulgaria, Albania, Macedonia. He lives there for about 900 years and then when comes Turks that I2a comes to Croatia, Bosnia, etc with Vlachs name, therefore I2a with southeast European branches are and Vlach origin, and originally were majority of them of White Croatian origin. I2a with mutation I-S17250. From these directions usually come I2a Dinaric-N types.
Serbs were Croats only in your dreams. :beer1:
I do not know how much you know genetics but it is undeniable.
https://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/31539-Genetics-confirm-migration-of-White-Croats-to-Croatia
If I2a came to Croatia/BiH with Vlachs then 37% of Croats in Croatia and 71% Croats from BiH are Vlachs which came with Turks, good point.
Your source is your own post, hahhaaa very funny.
This thread has been viewed 571977 times.