Search results

No, I'm 99% sure Sumerians were J1 This is yet another attempt, in line with afrocentrism, to appropiate an ancient (Abrahamic) culture And I think you were trying to say something like "haplo E is Egypt, haplo D is Mesopotamia, we created civilization" But the truth is Y-DNA DE is African...

Bronze/Iron Age Anatolians are what I mean by MENA

Yamnaya ancestry

They're trying to find "Near-Eastern" ancestry because in the 2019 Rome study it was discovered that CHG-derived ancestry as well as other non-steppe ancestries were close to 100% in the genomes between the East of the Empire to the city of Rome

Roosevelt(s) I1 https://www.familytreedna.com/groups/i-z382ydna-subclade/about/results

Yes, remove indo-europeity from the northern mediterranean and all you're left with is a genetic grouping very close to those in "west Asia/Middle-East" What were you expecting? That MENA adjacent ancestry is a MAJORITY of southern "Europe"(whatever this means) If they don't like MENA, chances...

The thing is EVERY haplogroup that isn't U2'3'4'7'8'9 doesn't fit with Y-DNA F-M89 F has the most diversity in the Middle East, same as U2'3'4'7'8'9 While the other haplogroups are M,R... seem to expand from India

Have you realized there's barely J haplogroups, and none T, H, V were found. It's all the 'unbranched' ancestors of them, R0 and R2. Which leads me to think that Arabs, given their southern geography, mixed with some of the earliest R0 and R2 out of India.

You just need that 1 man has a genetic mutation in his Y-chromosome (there are mutations on all of the DNA at all time) and give it time and DESCENDANTS

Karl Marx? I bet he was R1a

DE may be (not E1b1b though) We don't have proof of F, but in the Caucasus we have U6 (likely G), in Iranic people have U today (H) And R, N or Q have U

N does have a lot of U

A lot of people see the spread of the "yamnaya men" as a very important event and believe there's a greatness attached to the spread of the Indo-European languages (assuming that R1 carriers from Yamnaya did such a thing) and particularly, something special. But actually, civilization is quite...

The concept of territory must have been real, if not, we would have seen just the conquest of India, Africa, S. China... If you conquer the whole world, it's because you're planning on it

70% of European women descend from 2 haplogroups whose origins lie in the MULTITUDE of branches of female macrohaplogroup R we find in India: 50% from R0 (through H and V), HV exists mostly in Mesopotamia/Irak, but ultimately hails from India, where R0 carrier Lady Di came from. 20% from R2...

The sudden expansion of Y-DNA F in all the world, is a clear indication that during "prehistory" people were capable of moving continental distances and thinking big enough to conquer, not a small region, but whole surfaces of territory big as current nations. The scientific consensus has...

Did he confirm it? I recall this might be a rumor

The Human haplogroup clasification clearly shows Caucasoid is the default. The other races are a mixture with whatever is left of the pre-N mtDNA (L clades) + that haplogroup M. On the male side needs special mention the haplogroup E, that as oppose to F seems to have mixed with the previous...

It's Caucasoid Because "the east" is a mixing rather than just than the expansion in the east

High WHG have the Balts. And they have it instead of high I2 quantities. I don't remember the exact name of the paper. But in the Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) lived the Western Hunter Gatherers. That was until the Late Eneolithic(I think, I don't remember the exact era, but...