nope, you make no sense.. you keep quoting some suspicious sources...and discrediting known historical sources...
I do not claim that all people absorbed by Slavs are proto-Slavic...
its clear that it is not my suggestion, but a suggestion of a historian who translated book of Pliny..
visit the link and read...
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper...0137:book=4:chapter=27&highlight=sciri#note24
don't know how credible source this is, but:
this is order on Vistula from north to south...
there is no Finnish haplogroup N anywhere in mid Vistula...
Finnoi are not Finnish, but Fenni
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fenni
keep in mind that Estonians and Finish people call Russia Vennema and Venäjä respectively
in my opinion this Fenni/Venni are root word for Slo-veni
slo could come from "slobodni" = free
perhaps ancestors of Slovaks and Slovenians...
iBoulanes expand to nortwest and Slo-Fenni to south
Goths are not all population of all areas they keep under control...
this is also why Procopius mistakenly counts Alani (and Scirii) in Gothic nations...
it is like saying Kurds are turkish nation, because majority of them lives in Turkey....
don't mix Roman province ofIllyricum with actual Illyria...
actual Illyria most likely never extended much further north than Montenegro....
naming of provinces in Roman empire was intended to create melting pots in which actual ethnical identities would be weakened and eventually lost....e.g. province of Macedonia was more north than actual Macedonia.....its like if you would name half of Turkey and of Iran - Iranian province, and half of Turkey and half of Greece - as Turkic province, and half of Greece and half of Albania - Greece province... and everywhere only official language is latin... so you deliberatelly confuse national identities and create melting pot that speaks latin as that is only language both ethnicities in misnamed province will understand....
Pannonians are neither Illyrians nor Celts...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ancient_tribes_in_Illyria
Pannoni that migrate northeast (towards Dacia) can easily be the same people as Fenni in Vistula region where Russian primary chronicle says Danubian Slavs settled...
do you see the similarity in tribal names Pannoni and Fenni?
and similarity with Finnish and Estonian words for Russians (Venni)
I do not say tribal name changed..
its just written down differently in different times and languages...
Russian primary chronicle is medival russian document that captures their memory about their origin
it is written down in year 1113
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Primary_Chronicle
here's the text
http://www.utoronto.ca/elul/English/218/PVL-selections.pdf
Alani are iranian (sarmatian) nation from Caucasus..
they were also living all over Europe..
went to Spain with Suebi and Vandali
iranian speaking Ossetians are considered to origin from Alani
their main haplogroup is G, which is in accordance with origin from Alani
interestingly in north Ossetians there is some I2a-Dinaric
and Serboi tribe was just northeast of them in Asian Sarmatia
this is why Serboi are considered Alanian/Sarmatian in origin...
but I make claim that Serboi/Serbi that Ptolomeus captures in Caucasus are those Serians that Seneca mention as living unguarded among Sarmatians...
such an expression strongly suggests that they are not Sarmatians...
also its clear that they are not Alani but just their neighbours
Jordanes puts Scirii in Alani... i think he does that because they are alies and have nearby settlements in Caucasus and perhaps elsewhere..
that is Serians like Alani have settlements in various not directly connected locations....
whole point of such a strategy is in trading...
Serians/Seres are known as traders across Asia...
Siraces on east shores of Black sea are traders....
click for larger map
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:M...a,_and_the_neighbouring_countries_ca_1770.jpg
this is non-sense...
I am speaking about Vistula river area...