Basically all ur speculation provides more evidence for Albanian being a Paleo-Balkanic language survivor bringing Illyrian and Thracian together as closely related languages or distant dialects of a Proto-Illyro-Thracian ancestor language, or even a hybrid of the two if u dont like the idea of Illyrian and Thracia being closely related. Thats the only thing that makes sense.
And can u explain to me how these Free Dacian folks were almost entirely E-V13, J2b and R1b from regions that these hg are a minority? Is it a coincidence that only the E-V13 and J2b minorities decided to move south, just like the coincidence of only I2a Slavs decided to take up the Dinaric mountains while the R1a chose to stay more in the Pannonian fields?
Amazing what human mind can create and fantasize when ur emotionally attached to a theory ur trying to disprove. Is all this because ur a Slav, therefore a "newcomer" (at least linguistically) and ur pride doesnt allow u to accept the fact that the people claiming Kosovo (Albanians) are in fact indigenous? U want ur neighbour to share the same fate as u, that of being marked as a newcomer?
No, you're not right, we can discuss it is no problem, problem is because critical thinking missing to accept things can be different.
You think that Albanian = Illyrian is undeniable truth, but it is wrong, it is unproven hypothesis which there is a very long time and it is not moved away from the start.
It is much closer to the truth that Illyrian blood is today in Slovenians, Croats, Serbs, Bosniacs, Greeks, Albanians, even Hungarians, but nobody can claim ancestry because Illyrians disappeared as political and cultural entity in 3-4 century.
And mainly the past is mess, there is no strictly black or white.
Who was before or after, you can be very stunned because scientists are finding YDNA and mtDNA from different epochs in past and cubes are starting to fit.
But it is not main question.
Main question is why Albanians generally don't want to accept different scenarios, why Romanian, or Polish, or Slovenian etc. scientists should research your roots, your researchers should do.
Autochthonous? This is nonsense. Populations in past are different than today, populations are same only in some isolated area such as Papua New Guinea.
...
I will open the thread about American study which proved that original (non borrowed) Albanian words are the closest to the Old Church Slavonic and Lithuanian.
About Paleo Balkan languages there are a lot of hypothesis and unfortunately nothing proved, much more speculations.
For example Pelasgian language is subject of many disputes, although there is slight tendency in opinions that it can be any form of Proto-Kartvelian.
For Paleo-Balkan languages, if this term is suitable, it is important what we can see in science, which theory will win, Steppe or Anatholian.
But science according today's knowledge Armenian theory consider plausible, and Balkan theory is non plausible.
We will see new discoveries.
On basis of present knowledge someone can start to build assumptions but some information miss of the YDNA, mtDNA of some important sites in the past.
...
Carpi was courage people, they fought against Roman empire, should be proud.