J2b2-L283 (proto-illyrian)

?? The Taulanti drove Cassander out for good out of the Albanian region. It might have been Pyrrhus who lived amongst the Taulantians, that maybe absorbed them as part of Epirus.


from the book...macedonian wars against invading Illyrians by Alexander and his father Philip II, I have

In 314, the Macedonians led by Cassander himself, sailed from Epirus and assaulted the Illyrian coast. They conquered the main cities of Apollonia and Dyrrachium and then entered the Illyrian hinterland. During this campaign, Glaucias and his Illyrian troops were defeated, thus forcing the Illyrian king to temporarily retreat from the coastal areas. Macedonian garrisons were put in both Dyrrachium and Apollonia in order to keep their citizens under Macedonian rule and keep away potential Illyrian assaults. The Macedonian pressure forced Glaucias to sign a treaty of neutrality.
The Macedonian rule was undesired by the Hellenic colonies along the Adriatic and the Ionian Sea. Thus, in 312 the citizens in both Dyrrachium and Apollonia revolted against the Macedonian rule and expelled the Macedonians from their cities.
 
As per the Pliny census ..............the southern Illyrians ( illyrian proper ) make up 20.4% ( I did not include Pannonians ).................he does not include the Liburnians who revolted 10 years before and also does not include the Histrians who by that time where merged with the Venetic to make roman province number ten .................I would say the true percentage of Illyrian proper would be around 10%
The liburnians and histri were not illyrian, they were venetic people with some celtic influence
 
The liburnians and histri were not illyrian, they were venetic people with some celtic influence

where did you see this?

the veneto town of Oderzo was a market town fro Venetic and Illyrians ( noted as Histrians )

Eraclea was venetic capital and was neighbours with Illyrians near Jesolo ( Liburnians )

I don't think being a neighbour makes one same ethnicity ............maybe generations later , they have some affinity to each other ............like Celts mixing with Illyrians in Austria
 
from the book...macedonian wars against invading Illyrians by Alexander and his father Philip II, I have
In 314, the Macedonians led by Cassander himself, sailed from Epirus and assaulted the Illyrian coast. They conquered the main cities of Apollonia and Dyrrachium and then entered the Illyrian hinterland. During this campaign, Glaucias and his Illyrian troops were defeated, thus forcing the Illyrian king to temporarily retreat from the coastal areas. Macedonian garrisons were put in both Dyrrachium and Apollonia in order to keep their citizens under Macedonian rule and keep away potential Illyrian assaults. The Macedonian pressure forced Glaucias to sign a treaty of neutrality.
The Macedonian rule was undesired by the Hellenic colonies along the Adriatic and the Ionian Sea. Thus, in 312 the citizens in both Dyrrachium and Apollonia revolted against the Macedonian rule and expelled the Macedonians from their cities.

Yeah. The Taulantiis gained control of Durres/Dyrrahium in 312. After that they invaded Epirus to put Pyrrhus on the throne. Far from being destroyed or whatever.
 
What about a "out of Sardinia" model at J-Z585 stage ?

When considering J-L283 and Sardinia, we have three main possibilities :
1) One big late-migration with a lot of diversity for J-L283 carriers (very-unlikely, we will discuss that)
2) Several small migrations successively importing J-L283 diversity (but then why no R-L51 ?)
3) An in-situ diversification of J-Z585 with J-Z615 exiting Sardinia

If some modern J-Z638 in Sardinia could date from later migration related to Bell-Beaker times (or later with the Polada-Bonnanaro connection), it appears that Sardinia is heavy on 3500 BCE and 3100 BCE diversity both with ancient and modern samples.

1) Such diversity, if imported "lately" (Bell-Beaker or Later) in Sardinia require a large population (to carry ~1000+ years old diversity). But it create problems, by that time such population would efficientely inject Steppic admixture in Sardinia (which is not observed), and whoud also likely inject some Steppic haplogroups at the same moment (which is not observed). Therefore, a late injection of a very-diverse population seems very unlikely considering what we know of Sardinian autosomal DNA.

2) If imported through multiple small-"waves" it also bring the question of "why" multiple waves of J-L283 without R-L51 haplogroups ? Which also disfavors this hypothesis.

3) Finally, we could consider that L283 could have been injected in Sardinia around 3500 BCE and performed its first diversification stage in-situ before J-Z615 exiting Sardinia toward Italy.
At J-Z585 stage, diversity is found in Sardinia, in Central Italy (Tyrrhenian coast), and in North Africa (Tunisia). It could suggests that J-Z585 carriers may have followed obsidian trading contacts.
J-L283 could have been imported in Sardinia from Aegean peninsula into the Ozieri culture, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozieri_culture (claimed to have Aegean origins).

Therefore, I would seriously consider the possibility that L283 entered Sardinia very early (at Z600 or Z2509 stages) when migrating west and diversifies there down to Z585 before diversifying again following obsidian trade and then entering in north Italy before J-Z597 reaching its main diversification center around Eastern Alps.
For sure, this is not the only "working" scenario, but this one provides an easy explanation of the distribution for Z585 known diversity.
 
we have no idea what subclades are in Italy.

Etrurian sample is under CTS6190 : https://www.yfull.com/tree/J-Y45181/
Meaning he is inside the big Y15058 (or more exactely Z38240) diffusion area.
I would expect other Y15058 to be nearby the BY162321 sample (especially J-Z4133)

Daunian ones are likely either Y15058 or Z638. But sadly, as you say, we don't know for sure.
 
Matt Painted Pottery seems to be associated with Doric.

We know the Messapic alphabet is an adaptation of the Tarantinian Greek alphabet.

No. Oldest examples and diversity of that pottery is in Albania, it does not originate from Greeks.. Messapians and Daunians came from Albania not from Dalmatia.. As claimed by most archeologists.. So those Daunian samples are, unfortunately for most Albanians (for Albanian Stockholm Syndrome V13 and J2b2 carriers that are promoting Pelasgian nonsense), actually Albanian samples.. What anybody else says does not matter... :LOL:
 
Sample I18259 from Southern Hungary is actually Pannonian Illyrian. Belonging to the so called Syrmian group. Associated with Illyrian tribes of Amantinii and Breuci, but as probably closest parallels are in S.Hungary in the territories ofthe Northern-most Illyrian tribe Andizeti, it could descend of them. It still retains plenty of auDNA affinity with the IA Dalmatian samples. As it is archeologically linked to Glasinac, we may assume that Glasinac people were also like that or similar..

And as expected, all of Pannonian Illyrians descend of MIA Glasinac invaders from the South.. They imposed themselves onto the locals just as they did the same in Dardania.

This is where this fantasy about Mycenean-like Southern Illyrians will most likely crumble into dust once more samples are in the light. Firstly there was a MBA J2b2 migration into Albania,, and then there was Glasinac-Mati expansion and domination of the area, it is simply unlikely that these waves would have left no strong imprint and that Southern Illyrians would have been Mycenean like. But ofc we know why Southern Illyrians must be Mycenean-like, in order to fit them with the Albanian-Illyrian continuity... Albanian auDNA does not fit with the N.Italian like Illyrians... Good luck.. Illyrians in the North were generally relatively uniform and NOT Mycenean like..
 
Sample I18259 from Southern Hungary is actually Pannonian Illyrian. Belonging to the so called Syrmian group.

Also she carries an Illyrian mtDNA, I1a1, found in Posušje culture MBA sample. So do I but my clade is Germanic, from Hungary (my greatgrandmothers family does originate from SW Romania 300 years ago).

Avar PV-12, 89% EU_Core2 , 11% Avar_Asia_Core1, E-Z5016* sample also has an Illyrian mtdna found in IA Illyrian samples, I3313, I26742, I24883, HV0e.

Assuming Core2 is migrant too (it is unknown whether such IA Illyrian like ancestry existed in that area). There are many Z5016 clades in the Western Balkans, especially Z16988, so potentially this could be a migrant from there, or maybe Pannonia. When he got there is ofc another matter.

Definitely Basarabi-Bosut and Pannonian Scythian movements seem to be the only realistic path of most potential V13 in Illyrian lands.. Far being from opposing Illyrian V13, if its related with Scythians, I am all for that... I have always been a very pro-Scythian fanatic..:bigsmile:
 
Sample I18259 from Southern Hungary is actually Pannonian Illyrian. Belonging to the so called Syrmian group. Associated with Illyrian tribes of Amantinii and Breuci, but as probably closest parallels are in S.Hungary in the territories ofthe Northern-most Illyrian tribe Andizeti, it could descend of them. It still retains plenty of auDNA affinity with the IA Dalmatian samples. As it is archeologically linked to Glasinac, we may assume that Glasinac people were also like that or similar..

And as expected, all of Pannonian Illyrians descend of MIA Glasinac invaders from the South.. They imposed themselves onto the locals just as they did the same in Dardania.

This is where this fantasy about Mycenean-like Southern Illyrians will most likely crumble into dust once more samples are in the light. Firstly there was a MBA J2b2 migration into Albania,, and then there was Glasinac-Mati expansion and domination of the area, it is simply unlikely that these waves would have left no strong imprint and that Southern Illyrians would have been Mycenean like. But ofc we know why Southern Illyrians must be Mycenean-like, in order to fit them with the Albanian-Illyrian continuity... Albanian auDNA does not fit with the N.Italian like Illyrians... Good luck.. Illyrians in the North were generally relatively uniform and NOT Mycenean like..

The Mycenean-like Southern Illyrian fantasy is indeed laughable. The Daunian paper gives us a hint as to what we can expect from Southern Illyrians it should be noted though that they merged with Italic groups. But then there are actually already samples from Illyrii Proprie Dicti region but who cares. However by all means a paternal Illyrian continuity is a reality not a fiction. Also as a North East Gheg I get a solid IA Illyrian autosomal component next to my obvious paternal origin.

Last time I checked it was groups like Slavonians, Muslimanci etc. claiming Illyrian continuity with auDNA being dominated by Kievan Rus and Scythians to the least IA Thracian as their main components. Same goes for Shkije and other "Jugo"-sloveni which is neither a reality by auDNA nor by paternal or maternal lines (some 0.2% won't change this).
 
The only negative of having so much activity in this thread is my inability to carefully keep up.

FNMBKfL.png


But lets be honest, at least 1/5 to 1/2 of Albanians depending on region can claim continuity from Illyrians.
Whatever else, remains in the sphere of speculation. If we had a time machine we could try to guess what language Illyrians spoke, but I am 99% sure that no modern language would be representative. Simply put Occam's razor here would just state that likely some aspects of Illyrian culture and language were preserved, given the patriarchal nature of tribal society and the overwhelming majority of languages historically in the region(barring Basque, Etruscan) being a function of Y-DNA. And I say aspects, cause the maluable evolving nature of language, being composite of innovation in day to day life as well as corrupted over time, especially when non literary/standard through sound changes.

I really do not think I am saying something too controversial. Am I ?
 
Also she carries an Illyrian mtDNA, I1a1, found in Posušje culture MBA sample. So do I but my clade is Germanic, from Hungary (my greatgrandmothers family does originate from SW Romania 300 years ago).

Avar PV-12, 89% EU_Core2 , 11% Avar_Asia_Core1, E-Z5016* sample also has an Illyrian mtdna found in IA Illyrian samples, I3313, I26742, I24883, HV0e.

Assuming Core2 is migrant too (it is unknown whether such IA Illyrian like ancestry existed in that area). There are many Z5016 clades in the Western Balkans, especially Z16988, so potentially this could be a migrant from there, or maybe Pannonia. When he got there is ofc another matter.

Definitely Basarabi-Bosut and Pannonian Scythian movements seem to be the only realistic path of most potential V13 in Illyrian lands.. Far being from opposing Illyrian V13, if its related with Scythians, I am all for that... I have always been a very pro-Scythian fanatic..:bigsmile:

That is the most logical path indeed.

My Dads maternal line is W3a which was also amongst those MBA samples I think.
 
The Mycenean-like Southern Illyrian fantasy is indeed laughable. The Daunian paper gives us a hint as to what we can expect from Southern Illyrians it should be noted though that they merged with Italic groups. But then there are actually already samples from Illyrii Proprie Dicti region but who cares. However by all means a paternal Illyrian continuity is a reality not a fiction. Also as a North East Gheg I get a solid IA Illyrian autosomal component next to my obvious paternal origin.

Last time I checked it was groups like Slavonians, Muslimanci etc. claiming Illyrian continuity with auDNA being dominated by Kievan Rus and Scythians to the least IA Thracian as their main components. Same goes for Shkije and other "Jugo"-sloveni which is neither a reality by auDNA nor by paternal or maternal lines (some 0.2% won't change this).

Well yes there two very interesting Daunian samples especially ORD009:

Distance to: ITA_Daunian:SGR002
0.04822567 HRV_MBA:I4332
0.04977726 ITA_Daunian:ORD009
0.04986320 ITA_Etruscan_Tarquinia:TAQ004
0.05235255 ITA_Etruscan_PoggioRenzo:pRZ001
0.05281908 CHE_IA:SX18
0.05351022 ITA_Etruscan_Casenovole:CSN001
0.05459409 ITA_Etruscan_Casenovole:CSN013
0.05501516 HUN_LBA:I25504
0.05582612 SVN_EIA:I5692
0.05653730 ITA_Etruscan_Chiostraccio:UDC_P
0.05683961 SVN_EIA:I23978
0.05722009 ITA_Etruscan_Tarquinia:TAQ006
0.05730353 ITA_Etruscan_Tarquinia:TAQ008
0.05735746 HUN_MA_Szolad:SZ28
0.05747687 Bell_Beaker_ITA:I1979
0.05771377 SRB_BA_Maros:I23209
0.05786989 HUN_IA_La_Tene:I25510
0.05805128 ITA_Villanovan:RMPR1015
0.05813587 HUN_IA_La_Tene:I18531
0.05831200 ITA_Etruscan:RMPR474b
0.05840398 ITA_Etruscan_Magliano:MAG001
0.05856106 ITA_Etruscan_Casenovole:CSN009
0.05857096 SRB_Mokrin_EBA_Maros:MOK20
0.05883529 ITA_Etruscan_Tarquinia:TAQ013
0.05891547 HUN_IA_La_Tene:I25512

Distance to: ITA_Daunian:ORD009
0.02981895 SRB_Mokrin_EBA_Maros:I23208
0.03083687 HRV_MBA:I4332
0.03313425 HUN_MA_Szolad:SZ28
0.03375870 HRV_EIA:I26742
0.03378740 ITA_Etruscan:RMPR474b
0.03450379 HRV_MBA:I4331
0.03479787 HUN_IA_La_Tene_o:I4998
0.03606988 HRV_Pop_CA:pOP39
0.03617607 SRB_BA_Maros:I23209
0.03618780 HUN_MA_Szolad:SZ43
0.03626469 HUN_IA_Syrmian_SremGroup:I18259
0.03647183 ITA_Etruscan_Casenovole:CSN009
0.03711918 Bell_Beaker_CZE_late:pRU001.A0101
0.03823249 SVK_IA_Vekerzug:I11721
0.03842457 ITA_Rome_Late_Antiquity:RMPR33
0.03856108 SVN_EIA:I5692
0.03857368 SRB_Mokrin_EBA_Maros:MOK13
0.03893338 HRV_LIA_La_Tene:I26735
0.03899771 ITA_Tarquinia_EMA:TAQ022
0.03916572 HUN_IA_La_Tene:I18529
0.03918999 SRB_Mokrin_EBA_Maros:MOK20
0.03976882 HRV_EIA:I24882
0.03991316 ITA_Etruscan_Casenovole:CSN013
0.03992100 ITA_Rome_MA:RMPR55
0.04017425 HUN_BA:I7043

I don't think this is accidental for ORD009, despite mixing with the locals there. I'll have to look into details about some of those samples.

Well yes it is often Bosniaks claiming some Illyrian continuity. Those from Sandzak can claim a bit but ofc thats due to their Albanian origins. Serbs on poreklo do not claim any continuity. But in Croatian, Bosnian circles even among geneticists it used to be common to portray I2a Slav as indigenous.


Here Bosniak from Sandzak (he is actually I2a) on a panel Gothic origin of the Bosniaks at 1:45 says , "according to the research done by iGENEA when you add up nowhere except in Serbia and Montenegro was the Slavic component present, Illyrian was alot more present, and what is interesting is that according to their research the Illyrian component was more present in Bosnia than in Albania even though Albanians say all the time that their ancestors are Illyrians. But Illyrian component was proven to have been more present in Bosnia. And I was calculating, by some 30 % was the Illyrian component stronger in Yugoslavia than the Slavic component, so this country that we used to call Yugoslavia might have easily been called Illyria with much greater right".:LOL:


Croatian tv show about Bosnian pyramids, the Illyrian-Vedic civilization. This was from when it began. Ofc I2a 20000+ years old gene is always mentioned..:LOL:


"Illyrians are Slavs". Croatian theologist who is very popular in Serbia, but everywhere too. 10 times more people know of him than poreklo, casual people follow him..:LOL:


Him about Albanians, Caucasian Albania is there ofc.. :bigsmile: African E1b.. Albanian and Chechen blood feuding are related...

I heard there is at least one (maybe two) Bosnian IA sample in this upcoming study. I'm not sure I think he may be from the old Illyrian site of Vratnica central Bosnia, actually brooches found next to I18259 were found there too.
 
Well yes there two very interesting Daunian samples especially ORD009:

Distance to: ITA_Daunian:SGR002
0.04822567 HRV_MBA:I4332
0.04977726 ITA_Daunian:ORD009
0.04986320 ITA_Etruscan_Tarquinia:TAQ004
0.05235255 ITA_Etruscan_PoggioRenzo:pRZ001
0.05281908 CHE_IA:SX18
0.05351022 ITA_Etruscan_Casenovole:CSN001
0.05459409 ITA_Etruscan_Casenovole:CSN013
0.05501516 HUN_LBA:I25504
0.05582612 SVN_EIA:I5692
0.05653730 ITA_Etruscan_Chiostraccio:UDC_P
0.05683961 SVN_EIA:I23978
0.05722009 ITA_Etruscan_Tarquinia:TAQ006
0.05730353 ITA_Etruscan_Tarquinia:TAQ008
0.05735746 HUN_MA_Szolad:SZ28
0.05747687 Bell_Beaker_ITA:I1979
0.05771377 SRB_BA_Maros:I23209
0.05786989 HUN_IA_La_Tene:I25510
0.05805128 ITA_Villanovan:RMPR1015
0.05813587 HUN_IA_La_Tene:I18531
0.05831200 ITA_Etruscan:RMPR474b
0.05840398 ITA_Etruscan_Magliano:MAG001
0.05856106 ITA_Etruscan_Casenovole:CSN009
0.05857096 SRB_Mokrin_EBA_Maros:MOK20
0.05883529 ITA_Etruscan_Tarquinia:TAQ013
0.05891547 HUN_IA_La_Tene:I25512

Distance to: ITA_Daunian:ORD009
0.02981895 SRB_Mokrin_EBA_Maros:I23208
0.03083687 HRV_MBA:I4332
0.03313425 HUN_MA_Szolad:SZ28
0.03375870 HRV_EIA:I26742
0.03378740 ITA_Etruscan:RMPR474b
0.03450379 HRV_MBA:I4331
0.03479787 HUN_IA_La_Tene_o:I4998
0.03606988 HRV_Pop_CA:pOP39
0.03617607 SRB_BA_Maros:I23209
0.03618780 HUN_MA_Szolad:SZ43
0.03626469 HUN_IA_Syrmian_SremGroup:I18259
0.03647183 ITA_Etruscan_Casenovole:CSN009
0.03711918 Bell_Beaker_CZE_late:pRU001.A0101
0.03823249 SVK_IA_Vekerzug:I11721
0.03842457 ITA_Rome_Late_Antiquity:RMPR33
0.03856108 SVN_EIA:I5692
0.03857368 SRB_Mokrin_EBA_Maros:MOK13
0.03893338 HRV_LIA_La_Tene:I26735
0.03899771 ITA_Tarquinia_EMA:TAQ022
0.03916572 HUN_IA_La_Tene:I18529
0.03918999 SRB_Mokrin_EBA_Maros:MOK20
0.03976882 HRV_EIA:I24882
0.03991316 ITA_Etruscan_Casenovole:CSN013
0.03992100 ITA_Rome_MA:RMPR55
0.04017425 HUN_BA:I7043

I don't think this is accidental for ORD009, despite mixing with the locals there. I'll have to look into details about some of those samples.

Well yes it is often Bosniaks claiming some Illyrian continuity. Those from Sandzak can claim a bit but ofc thats due to their Albanian origins. Serbs on poreklo do not claim any continuity. But in Croatian, Bosnian circles even among geneticists it used to be common to portray I2a Slav as indigenous.


Here Bosniak from Sandzak on a panel Gothic origin of the Bosniaks at 1:45 says , "according to the research done by iGENEA when you add up nowhere except in Serbia and Montenegro was the Slavic component present, Illyrian was alot more present, and what is interesting is that according to their research the Illyrian component was more present in Bosnia than in Albania even though Albanians say all the time that their ancestors are Illyrians. But Illyrian component was proven to have been more present in Bosnia. And I was calculating, by some 30 % was the Illyrian component stronger in Yugoslavia than the Slavic component, so this country that we used to call Yugoslavia might have easily been called Illyria with much greater right".:LOL:


Croatian tv show about Bosnian pyramids, the Illyrian-Vedic civilization. This was from when it began. Ofc I2a 20000+ years old gene is always mentioned..:LOL:


"Illyrians are Slavs". Croatian theologist who is very popular in Serbia, but everywhere too. 10 times more people know of him than poreklo, casual people follow him..:LOL:


Him about Albanians, Caucasian Albania is there ofc.. :bigsmile: African E1b etc..

I heard there is at least one (maybe two) Bosnian IA sample in this upcoming study. I'm not sure I think he may be from the old Illyrian site of Vratnica central Bosnia, actually brooches found next to I18259 were found there too.

Holy crap. I don't want to watch these alone their dumb faces are giving me a hard time. I know what their opinion is on us. We often go to Kotorr since we also have Albanian ancestors from there that were expelled. The looks we got from the Slavs there are quite funny they at first don't know into what category they can put our Prishtina Valley dialect but once they ask where we are from and we say Kosovo they get shivers and show off that racist mentality. There was once this Serbian elder who said "you are Krasniqi? - we said "yes we are" he then went on to say that we are Proto Serbs :LOL: My dad said then: " you know what the Medici are also Serbs Medic = Medici.
 
No. Oldest examples and diversity of that pottery is in Albania, it does not originate from Greeks.. Messapians and Daunians came from Albania not from Dalmatia.. As claimed by most archeologists.. So those Daunian samples are, unfortunately for most Albanians (for Albanian Stockholm Syndrome V13 and J2b2 carriers that are promoting Pelasgian nonsense), actually Albanian samples.. What anybody else says does not matter...:LOL:

Matt-Painted Pottery Culture from all accounts was widespread in Central Greece, Northern Greece, Macedonia, Thessaly, Epirus and Southern Albania. It looks to be related to Middle Helladic Civilizations, obviously predating Doric but still Derite was to a degree right.

https://www.researchgate.net/public...ery_from_Alani_ancient_upper_Macedonia_Greece

https://www.ascsa.edu.gr/uploads/media/hesperia/147085.pdf

You just seem to want to give an explanation without quoting any particular study: https://www.researchgate.net/public..._Sibaritide_Area_CS_Calabria_-_southern_Italy

This culture was present in Calabria as well.

It doesn't go like that. Your confirmation bias is hitting hard on you. Otherwise, you are free to quote any study that links in particular Daunians, Messapians, and the other tribe to this culture. Feel free to prove us wrong.
 
Small update on diversification dynamics with YFULL v10.00

Main hypotheses:
-To diversify a population need to expand/migrate to some extend (if staying at the same location, competition between lineages avoids diversity to survive).
-An expanding population diversifies (not really an assumption ...)
-When in contact with a expanding population, a neighbor population also experience some level of diversification (not affecting all clades)
-Neighbors populations are involved in similar historical events and therefore have diversification histories that are correlating.

Feel free to discuss these assumtions if you disagree (but please, go beyond simple disagreement and provide some well documented exemples that you consider as counter exemples). That way, we should be able to discuss the methodology, its relevance, and we may avoid "ideologically"-tainted positions.

Let start with a clade on which I guess everybody agrees thanks to recent ancient DNA :

Y15058.png


Keep in mind the 1800-1700 BCE diversification event.
Obvious Bronze-Age Collapse related stuff around 1300 BCE.
We have a little bit of signal around 900 BCE, we will discuss that later.
Some 600 BCE stuff also happening (concerns PH1602).
Obvious ~0 CE signal.

Beyond the effect around 0 CE likely linked with Romans, we could also note that Illyrian-clade identified during EIA in western Balkans (Patterson et al. 2021) didn't went through a large European dispersion but nearly got extinct (J-Y86930).


Then let tacle a clade showing an amazong history/diversification correaltion:
Y21045.png


For people doubting of the relevance of this probe :
-Of course the 1700 BCE diversification for Y21045 is totally "unrelated" to the nearby Y15058 (just north of Y21045) diversification
-Of course the 1200 BCE diversification is "unrelated" to Bronze-Age Collase.
-Of course the 0 CE diversification is "unrelated" to Roman invasions (in this case likely recovery post-invasion)
-Of source the 700 CE diversification is "unrelated" with Slavic invasions.
What a big bunch of coincindences for this clade ;) .

Also note that Y21045, despite being significantly diverse by roman times, didn't exited at all Albania following Roman invasion.

Finally let enter the hard "topic", the terrible Z631 clade ...

Z631.png


Note the diffusion peaking around 750 BCE (mix of intense diffusions around 900, 800 and 600 BCE).
There is also a 400 BCE diffusion stage.
Roman times have nearly no signal (despite some level of interaction due to the well known roman Z631 sample in 100 CE).

Then, let compare with other clades :
-Y21045 : nothing around 900-400 BCE, should we believe that Z631 had a major expansion just next to Y21045 without Y21045 being affected ? What a challenge.
-Y15058 : there is some level of match around 900 BCE, the Y15058-subclades involved are BY162321 and CTS6190, respectively attested with ancient DNA around Hungarian-Austrian border around 300 BCE and in Etruria around 650 BCE. Therefore the 900 BCE diversification appear to concern the northern edge of Y15058. Also the PH1602 diversification around 600 BCE in Balkans strickingly match with a known Z631 balkanic clade also carrying 600 BCE diversity.

Let summarize all we have :
--> Illyrian lineage below Z38240 (J-Y86930) seems to have been nearly exterminated (by romans ? or slavs ? some ~100-500 CE samples would allow to test that) and not really diffused by Romans through all Europe.
--> Illyrian lineage below Y21045 (significantly diverse) didn't exited Albania at all during roman times.
In such context, it is hard to explain how Romans would have selected Z631 dudes to disperse them and only them.
We have here a significant mismatch of outcome for the roman invasion with the roman dispersion theory.
Such mismatch could be "reduced" if Z631 diversification was post-roman ... but it is pre-roman, which nearly completely kills this "roman-diffusion" theory.

On top of that, we have small indications from diversification correlation that Z631 was likely near the northern clade of Y15058 (BY162321 & CTS6190).
Therefore, if I had to put a coin on Z631 location during EIA ... I would go for the northern area covered by Y15058 --> Slovenia/Austria.
 
I heard there is at least one (maybe two) Bosnian IA sample in this upcoming study. I'm not sure I think he may be from the old Illyrian site of Vratnica central Bosnia, actually brooches found next to I18259 were found there too.

Any idea when this will be published?

Also I really think you, Riverman and Hawk might enjoy this:

https://adnaera.com/2019/03/10/the-cirum-pontic-region-c-4000-3000-bc/

The more interesting parts are in the comments.

Came across it mainly researching the samples here:
rFBpxtV.png


Think starting much earlier can elucidate the Balkans and the key might be North of Caucasus.

PS: That last guy, just judging from the smirk knows exactly what he is doing. He is quite enjoying the trolling, and preying on ignorance. Also the youtube comments gave me aids.

PSS: When I researched the Bosnians are more Illyrian than Albanians claim, I found the source to be some 2009 or 2010 news article based on a Bosnian medical doctors "paper", his conclusion stemming from the assumption I2a1 is Illyrian and on blood groups (iirc, xD). Was Balkan Pyramid level research.
 
Small update on diversification dynamics with YFULL v10.00
Main hypotheses:
-To diversify a population need to expand/migrate to some extend (if staying at the same location, competition between lineages avoids diversity to survive).
-An expanding population diversifies (not really an assumption ...)
-When in contact with a expanding population, a neighbor population also experience some level of diversification (not affecting all clades)
-Neighbors populations are involved in similar historical events and therefore have diversification histories that are correlating.
Feel free to discuss these assumtions if you disagree (but please, go beyond simple disagreement and provide some well documented exemples that you consider as counter exemples). That way, we should be able to discuss the methodology, its relevance, and we may avoid "ideologically"-tainted positions.
Let start with a clade on which I guess everybody agrees thanks to recent ancient DNA :
Y15058.png

Keep in mind the 1800-1700 BCE diversification event.
Obvious Bronze-Age Collapse related stuff around 1300 BCE.
We have a little bit of signal around 900 BCE, we will discuss that later.
Some 600 BCE stuff also happening (concerns PH1602).
Obvious ~0 CE signal.
Beyond the effect around 0 CE likely linked with Romans, we could also note that Illyrian-clade identified during EIA in western Balkans (Patterson et al. 2021) didn't went through a large European dispersion but nearly got extinct (J-Y86930).
Then let tacle a clade showing an amazong history/diversification correaltion:
Y21045.png

For people doubting of the relevance of this probe :
-Of course the 1700 BCE diversification for Y21045 is totally "unrelated" to the nearby Y15058 (just north of Y21045) diversification
-Of course the 1200 BCE diversification is "unrelated" to Bronze-Age Collase.
-Of course the 0 CE diversification is "unrelated" to Roman invasions (in this case likely recovery post-invasion)
-Of source the 700 CE diversification is "unrelated" with Slavic invasions.
What a big bunch of coincindences for this clade ;) .
Also note that Y21045, despite being significantly diverse by roman times, didn't exited at all Albania following Roman invasion.
Finally let enter the hard "topic", the terrible Z631 clade ...
Z631.png

Note the diffusion peaking around 750 BCE (mix of intense diffusions around 900, 800 and 600 BCE).
There is also a 400 BCE diffusion stage.
Roman times have nearly no signal (despite some level of interaction due to the well known roman Z631 sample in 100 CE).
Then, let compare with other clades :
-Y21045 : nothing around 900-400 BCE, should we believe that Z631 had a major expansion just next to Y21045 without Y21045 being affected ? What a challenge.
-Y15058 : there is some level of match around 900 BCE, the Y15058-subclades involved are BY162321 and CTS6190, respectively attested with ancient DNA around Hungarian-Austrian border around 300 BCE and in Etruria around 650 BCE. Therefore the 900 BCE diversification appear to concern the northern edge of Y15058. Also the PH1602 diversification around 600 BCE in Balkans strickingly match with a known Z631 balkanic clade also carrying 600 BCE diversity.
Let summarize all we have :
--> Illyrian lineage below Z38240 (J-Y86930) seems to have been nearly exterminated (by romans ? or slavs ? some ~100-500 CE samples would allow to test that) and not really diffused by Romans through all Europe.
--> Illyrian lineage below Y21045 (significantly diverse) didn't exited Albania at all during roman times.
In such context, it is hard to explain how Romans would have selected Z631 dudes to disperse them and only them.
We have here a significant mismatch of outcome for the roman invasion with the roman dispersion theory.
Such mismatch could be "reduced" if Z631 diversification was post-roman ... but it is pre-roman, which nearly completely kills this "roman-diffusion" theory.
On top of that, we have small indications from diversification correlation that Z631 was likely near the northern clade of Y15058 (BY162321 & CTS6190).
Therefore, if I had to put a coin on Z631 location during EIA ... I would go for the northern area covered by Y15058 --> Slovenia/Austria.

LOL, I think you might jinx us J-Y21045>PH4679 by proclaiming we are Illyrians in Albania since MBA-LBA, considering your theories have been "off" thus far :LOL:
 
LOL, I think you might jinx us J-Y21045>PH4679 already proclaiming we are Illyrians in Albanian since MBA-LBA, considering your theories have been "off" thus far :LOL:

Well before Patterson et al. 2021, I was acknowledging that some branches of Z638 could have reach southern Balkans as soon as ~2000 BCE.
This study confirmed it (partially, we can put the lower bound at 1700 BCE now), and by locating precisely Y15058 expansion (nearly exactly where my diversity map was placing it) it solved a lot of things ;) .

Btw, Illyrians are not a thing by MBA-LBA ... the fact that you use "we" to speak of Illyrians is also disturbing.
It illustrates how you are affected by ideology, you confuse DNA with culture.
 
Well before Patterson et al. 2021, I was acknowledging that some branches of Z638 could have reach southern Balkans as soon as ~2000 BCE.
This study confirmed it (partially, we can put the lower bound at 1700 BCE now), and by locating precisely Y15058 expansion it solved a lot of things ;) .
Btw, Illyrians are not a thing by MBA-LBA ... the fact that you use "we" to speak of Illyrians is also disturbing.
It illustrates how you are affected by ideology, you confuse DNA with culture.

You can't even take any jokes, can you :LOL:

Of course the Illyrians are mentioned only in the Iron Age, but their ancestors or "Proto-Illyrians" surely lived before that. And according to your "model" J-Y21045>PH4679 would fit that. You yourself said it's "native" to Albania since ~1700 BC and proclaimed it Illyrian lineage below Y21045 on multiple occasions, yet you're accusing me of conspiracies or who knows what.

Here:

--> Illyrian lineage below Y21045 (significantly diverse) didn't exited Albania at all during roman times.

Then, on the Illyrian context, Y21045 is without doubt fitting the bill.

--> Y21045 was moving/expanding around 1800BC (same moment than Y15058) and PH4679 diffused inside Albania around 1200 BC.

Thus, I would bet for Y21045 arrival in Albania or very nearby by 1800-1700BC at the same moment of the Y15058 diffusion.

I should follow Archetype0ne's advice and not even bother replying to you anymore. And please do limit your walls, as it can get dizzy trying to sift through some of the nonsense :)
 
Last edited:

This thread has been viewed 496843 times.

Back
Top