I don't rely too much on statues or pictures of ancient times, personally. That said, it's evident today Spanyards have an heavy heritage of ancient Iberians, I think nobody challenges this thought.The Iberian genotype and culture in present-day Iberia have not been extinct after all.
Iberians (Iberos) were R1b as well Celtics of Iberia were. Look at this map:I don't rely too much on statues or pictures of ancient times, personally. That said, it's evident today Spanyards have an heavy heritage of ancient Iberians, I think nobody challenges this thought.
I don't agree here. Every people or culture has had its times of agressivity and warfare, at least at some level. I would say that the care of environment has never been the first concern of mighty men in History. At the contrary, ancient civilisations and "successful" culture has proved very cruel against environment. (woods burned or used, according to local powers needs). It's true Rome made a "good" work concerning wood use : Mediterranean see surroundings were less dessicated before, if what I read is true.For all of those belonging to the Atlantic Bronce culture. Bell Beakers, Cogotas Culture, Vettones, Lusitanians, Stelae peoples[voyagers around the Northern Coast of Mediterranean Sea], Tartessos, Iberians, Celts from the West Theory, And Later, The migration of the Celts belonging to Hallstat and La tenne, Received and Hosted by The Iberian folks, less ancient as some ocultists agenda supports, I must to Say, that these pacific migrations, happened in circles and different periods, in order to avoid the inminent wars Against differents folks imperialists populatitions, As northern ones and latin ones. For those pacific and respectfull about the care of the Environtent And Nature. We all have had our mother land in Slavic Territories. I said.
https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/spal/article/view/8543/9405
I don't agree here. Every people or culture has had its times of agressivity and warfare, at least at some level. I would say that the care of environment has never been the first concern of mighty men in History. At the contrary, ancient civilisations and "successful" culture has proved very cruel against environment. (woods burned or used, according to local powers needs). It's true Rome made a "good" work concerning wood use : Mediterranean see surroundings were less dessicated before, if what I read is true.For all of those belonging to the Atlantic Bronce culture. Bell Beakers, Cogotas Culture, Vettones, Lusitanians, Stelae peoples[voyagers around the Northern Coast of Mediterranean Sea], Tartessos, Iberians, Celts from the West Theory, And Later, The migration of the Celts belonging to Hallstat and La tenne, Received and Hosted by The Iberian folks, less ancient as some ocultists agenda supports, I must to Say, that these pacific migrations, happened in circles and different periods, in order to avoid the inminent wars Against differents folks imperialists populatitions, As northern ones and latin ones. For those pacific and respectfull about the care of the Environtent And Nature. We all have had our mother land in Slavic Territories. I said.
https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/spal/article/view/8543/9405
I would say: in fact Rome made a bad work, as every almost developped culture in past.I don't agree here. Every people or culture has had its times of agressivity and warfare, at least at some level. I would say that the care of environment has never been the first concern of mighty men in History. At the contrary, ancient civilisations and "successful" culture has proved very cruel against environment. (woods burned or used, according to local powers needs). It's true Rome made a "good" work concerning wood use : Mediterranean see surroundings were less dessicated before, if what I read is true.
I'm sorry, but why? I exposed only a sincere opinion on precise affirmations. But it's enough to me for this aspect which is aside of the very topic we were far from it.Moesan... You continue touching me with the spoon Again and again... The play is over.
If the steppe signature didn’t arrive until after 2000 BC, how do you explain this?
Portugal
I5428 - I-S2660 / U5b1-T16189C!-T16192C! - (12% steppe, >3300 BC)
I5429 - I-M253 / J2b1a3 (10% steppe, >3000 BC)
I11592 - I-AMM083 / U5b2b - (14% steppe, >2800 BC)
12% of DNA is equivalent to a first cousin. Where did the Lusitanians get that percentage if the first R1b-L51> weren’t already in the area?
I7691 - R-L51 / J1c1 (23% steppe, >2200 BC)
Spain
EHU002 - R-P312 / K1a4a1 - (24% steppe, >2500 BC)
Many people have claimed this sample is in ZZ12 and therefore would be DF27 (Iñigo Olalde or whoever does his BAM file refinements isn’t very good at it).