• Don't want to see ads? Install an adblocker like uBlock Origin or use a Europe-based privacy-friendly browser like Vivaldi or Mullvad.

Immigration France in Flames

Gaijin 06 said:
I find that an incredibly intolerant attitude.

Do you object to stickers supporting football teams on cars?
Do you object to someone sticking a national flag on a car?

How about banning stickers or posters of political allegiance that people seem to like to put up around election times who show who they support?

I don't like stickers on cars in general, but don't object to non-religious ones. You have to understand that for a convinced atheist (like me), it is insulting when someone preaches that "Jesus will save you", or "Allah is the only god". These are the intolerant people who do not respect other believes. I don't post stickers "God doesn not exist", as it would offend those who believe in god. Why should they have the right to tell me that I am wrong ? (because basically such religious stickers mean "you atheists are wrong", which is as insulting as to say "go to hell ******' infidel !"). I could only admit stickers, posters, veils, crucifixes, etc. if I am allowed to errect an edifice with a huge sign explaining why I believe that all religious people are mistaken and a personal god cannot possibly exist. But I am sure they would complain (or even destroy or vandalise that edifice or sign).

But what's the difference between my doing this and their doing what they do now ? So far, I am the tolerant one as I refrain from posting signs related to metaphysical/religious beliefs in public.
 
Maciamo, it sounds like you see this as being intrusive. Which is understandable. But this seems more of an issue as to a person's right of what they want put on the back of their cars, or whatever the situation may be. :?
 
Maciamo said:
You have to understand that for a convinced atheist (like me), it is insulting when someone preaches that "Jesus will save you", or "Allah is the only god". These are the intolerant people who do not respect other believes. I don't post stickers "God doesn not exist", as it would offend those who believe in god. Why should they have the right to tell me that I am wrong ?

If you are this intolerant in real life, it comes as no surprise to me that you're unable to live in Japan and are thinking of packing up to leave.

If I have a sticker on my car saying "Liverpool FC for the cup" does that insult you, as you may not believe Liverpool will win the cup? If you firmly believe it then I am offending you?

Why should religous car stickers be any different?

What about political posters - "vote for Mr XXX, he will save the country". If you lean the other way, politically - is this insulting you?

You really must learn to get off your "Maciamo is always right" horse and accept there are other people in this world and they have an equal right to their opinions.

We live - thankfullly - in a society that has pretty close to free speech. It sounds like you would do anyway will all this if you could - " I would like to live in a country with a prohibition on all such religious signs."
 
Gaijin 06 said:
If I have a sticker on my car saying "Liverpool FC for the cup" does that insult you, as you may not believe Liverpool will win the cup? If you firmly believe it then I am offending you?

I don't care about football or sports in general. I don't mind people cheering one team.

Why should religous car stickers be any different?

Because religions is about the deepest meaning of life itself. It defines all the values one bases its daily life on, even unconsciously. People who believe that a omniscent and omnipotent god gave them the "Truth" in the form of the Bible or the Koran, and that anything else is false or should be condemned, are a danger to any society with diversity in beliefs. I am for freedom or opinions and religions, and that is why I am against proselytism and public display of one's faith, as it conflicts with other beliefs. Religion is such a strong force among human beings that people kill and die for their religion. I am not talking about remote medieval times, but today's society, terrorism and integration of Muslims in any other society. Muslims have problems with Christians, Jews, Hindus Agnostics and Atheists alike. Why ? Because they want to show them that they are Muslim and that this is the only truth. Some Christians have the same problem.

What about political posters - "vote for Mr XXX, he will save the country". If you lean the other way, politically - is this insulting you?

Why ? It's not telling me that my whole existence is wrong and that I will go to hell for eternity. Muslims and Christians believe in heaven and hell and that their faith is the only possible truth... Politicians just want power, or at best have opinions, maybe even convictions, but about more practical things, remote from existential beliefs.

You really must learn to get off your "Maciamo is always right" horse and accept there are other people in this world and they have an equal right to their opinions.

In this thread, I have voiced my opinion and you are the one to reject it intolerantly. Religion is not about opinions, it's about absolute faith.

We live - thankfullly - in a society that has pretty close to free speech. It sounds like you would do anyway will all this if you could - " I would like to live in a country with a prohibition on all such religious signs."

As far as I know, freedom of speech has many restrictions, including libel, slander, racist or degrading comments. For me, religious proselytism and slogans about the exclusive "truth" of one religion represent all this. They are fundamentally intolerant of other beliefs. What's more, exclusive religions have always been the cause of wars and violence (e.g. terrorism nowadays). So preaching about such religion is inciting to violence.
 
Maciamo said:
I don't care about football or sports in general. I don't mind people cheering one team.

Because religions is about the deepest meaning of life itself.

Some people would say that football is the deepest meaning of life. The may not be right, you may not be right. I don't think either of you has the right to reject the others freedom of expression.

For them, displaying a football sticker might be incitement to violence... I suggest that driving round some pubs in Glasgow with the "wrong" sticker might be an "incitement to violence".
 
Gaijin 06 said:
For them, displaying a football sticker might be incitement to violence... I suggest that driving round some pubs in Glasgow with the "wrong" sticker might be an "incitement to violence".

Then they should refrain from doing so. I am not a supporter of violence. Footballs fans fighting together (or worse hooligans), enter in the same category as religious extremists (and terrorists if they cause the death of other people in the stadium, as happened at the Heysel Stadium in Brussels in 1985, where 39 died due to British hooligans).

When I hear "Allah is the only God, and that Muhammad is his prophet" or "Jesus Can Save You From Hell", I hear old-fashioned values that do not match with contemporary society, religious fanaticism, exclusive faith, crusades, jihad, wars of religions, terrorism, etc. These are incitements to violence or hatred, not peace and love as they claim. Why do I think so ? History has proven me right for the last 2000 years. There is nothing positive is exclusive religions like Christianity and Islam that cannot be obtained from non-exclusive religions like Buddhism or just from philosophy or non-religious Deistic beliefs. All they bring is intolerance, fear, violence, war and destruction.

I am sorry for me, a civilised society should prevent such religions from spreading their messages of chaos in public, for the good of society itself. A completely free society means anarchy, unrestrained violence and absence of justice. A civilised one is one that can control its negative and dangerous elements, and while giving as much freedom and prosperity to the greater number. It is no coincidence that youth from religious (here Muslim) families were the ones to set fire to 9,000 vehicles in France in the last 2 weeks. Their religion has shaped their mind to reject anything that is not in line with its teachings, and use violence when necessary.
 
"It is no coincidence that youth from religious (here Muslim) families were the ones to set fire to 9,000 vehicles in France in the last 2 weeks. Their religion has shaped their mind to reject anything that is not in line with its teachings, and use violence when necessary."

Words fail me to describe your bigotry.
 
Gaijin 06 said:
Words fail me to describe your bigotry.

And what is your explanation ? Have you ever studied psychology ? Have you ever studied the influenced of religious education on personality, conception of society, and violence ?

It's easy to criticise when you don't have a better explanation...
 
The rioters are Muslim does not mean there is a casual link between the two BigMac.

There have been plenty of riots in France by disadvantaged non-Muslim French people, just like there have been in the UK in the 80's.

Indeed you could say the rioters are well integrated into the French culture, as revolution and violence is an important part of France's history.
 
Gaijin 06 said:
Indeed you could say the rioters are well integrated into the French culture, as revolution and violence is an important part of France's history.

Is it ? When was the last revolution ? 1848 ? (and not a big one with that). We could say the same for most countries (American revolution, Cromwell's revolution in Britain, Chinese revolution of 1911 and 1948 + cultural revolution + capitalist revolution, many colonies' revolution of independence, etc.)

Anyway, there is no doubt to most French/Belgian people that many (not all, though) North African immigrants are not well adapted in French/Belgian society. Most people with "field experience" agree that this is because they reject fundamental values of French or Belgian society (which are pretty similar). One is secularism, but another more important one is to embrace the local ways, including the language, dressing style and customs. It may not be necessary to be accepted in some other countries, but it is in Belgium and France. If they can't agree with that, they should expect the indigenous population to change. They are free to adapt or leave. I think that 30 or 40 years is more than enough to adapt. Those who still can't should consider alternatives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duo
Bigotry? If you had lived either in France in Belgium you would realize what Maciamo says is quite true and logic. Some of these people see our western values and way of life here as an imposition on their freedoms and lifestyle even. The Funny thing is that they are living here, in Western Europe, and have weird idea that they should be living freely as they are accustomed to in their local culture or as their parents used to live.


Let me adress one issue for example.. there is no respect from these communities to the society here, yet they think they are entitled to the mainstream community to respect them. You are failing to realise that the kind of Islam they practice is isolating them and making them hostile.


The veil thing for one is something that causes much tension between the societal groups. Because the girls of their own community, I am talking about northern africans, wear veils and what not, male northen african youth don't harrass them, because they are to be respected or whatever, yet for western girls they are always harrasing them on the streets, sometimes even physically. Now you never see the reverse. Practically no one even aproches a girl wearing a veil because it is implied that they are off limits. This is something that vexes me to no avail. Why do I have to worry that some sexually frustrated a**hole bother my girlfriend if she is alone at night because she has blonde hair and dresses in a way befiting the female body? With my ex I would always make sure to take her all the way home everytime because of the stories she had told me of harrasment happening to her and her sister while being alone in certain downtown areas here in brussels.


The veil also causes this division. Northen african girls should be respected and well treated but western girls are sluts because they wear miniskirts so lets try to grope them and call out on them in the streets. I see many times northen african males with belgian/western girls but I NEVER EVER have seen a Belgian/western male with a girl veil... and very rarely with a north african girl who behaves like their western counterparts.


The veil is a primitive way of looking at the concept of the woman as a being. And it does not match the western outlook on relations between the sexes that's why it always cause friction. Just another example how this bizarre conservative way of Islam causes problems within the communities.


Now, back to what Maciamo said I fully agree. He is giving you a logical reason on how this extremist way of Islam is promting such actions... and please don't tell me is because they have no jobs or are discrimanted or whatever. The failure of integration on the part of muslim northern african/arab communities has been a problem that always existed but was allowed to be dormant and was not given much attention by the local authorities and now because tensions between West and Islam are rising the deepness of the problem is begining to rise.


I think you are perceiving the attitude of secularlism that Maciamo and I share as some kind of bigotry and racism. But you are failing to realize that religion has always caused such division and tension. I can't convince you that I am right, you will have to see for yourself but trust me you will agree after living a year or two in Brussels or Paris. Now if you think that Western Europe is just blazing with racism and Maciamo and I are at the front, why is it you never hear about Asian immigrants being put down or any accusations being directed towards them? The incredible attitude of Chinese immigrants has impressed me to no end. In my home land and in Belgium as well. Their hard work attitude and respect of local culture makes them a desirable pool of human resources to draw from for every nation looking for immigrants. Yet they also still maintain their culture. Their restaurants are still decorated with symbols alluding to their culture, they still celebrate the chinese new year, they speak chinese, yet they also seem to fit so well in the host society. Sure there is a feeling of comradecy between themselves as is only natural, yet they do not shun the local culture rather they always try to embrace it be part of it. I remember back in 1995 a chinese toy shop opened in Tirana, the capital of Albania, my native country, and I was amazed to see that only after 6 months the lady at the counter was speaking comprehansible albanian, a language highly difficult to aproach for any foreigner.


I come from a nation that has launched immigrant communites in much of Western Europe and North America. Now although here in Europe we don't have such a great reputation due to a small minority that resorts to organized crime as way of life, I have always found that Albanian and MOST EASTERN EUROPEAN immigrants fit or at least try hard to fit in the host society. Most of them seek education, jobs, and integration. I was amazed how in the US and Canada all the Albanians I have met seemed so well integrated and had adopted the lifestyle of their new homes. Now of course they still mantained their language and some essential customs that we are proud to have, as this also gives richness to multi-ethnic society, but in no way did their attitudes conflict with the ones of the host society.


I tend to look at immigration and the immigrants' role into society from a sociological standpoint. A State will always want efficient immigrants that can adopt well their lifestyle so that society runs effeciently and can progress. A hostile immigrant community will cause society to face issues and cause many problems, and are therefore not desirable, not because of their roots but because of the negative role they seem to contributing to society in general, a very unproductive role that cuases more harm than good. If Europe is to have Grand Plans for the future and wants to see them through they can't be derailed by some hostile outside faction that is putting useless rocks in their path because of irrational concepts of life or concepts of life that they want to impose on the the majority of people here( considered by the latter to be irrational). Europe got rid of religion leading your way of life as Maciamo said 200 yrs ago, and now some minority groups expect us to become some kind of new caliphat of Muslim rule. I'm sorry but if wanting to prevent this makes me a bigot then so be it.
 
Duo, thank you for your reply. I must address a couple of points.

Duo said:
Bigotry? If you had lived either in France in Belgium you would realize what Maciamo says is quite true and logic.

Why is is only France and Belgium that have these problems then? Could it be something to do with the host communities rather than the guests?

Duo said:
Why do I have to worry that some sexually frustrated a**hole bother my girlfriend if she is alone at night because she has blonde hair and dresses in a way befiting the female body?

I can't believe only Muslims hassle your girlfriend.

Duo said:
I think you are perceiving the attitude of secularlism that Maciamo and I share as some kind of bigotry and racism. But you are failing to realize that religion has always caused such division and tension.

Not really. I am aware as the next man about the problems religion has "caused" down the years. I as probably as secular or more so than you in my views.

I also don't doubt that if religion hadn't been the "driving force" behind these wars then something else would have been. It is part of human nature, whether we like it or not.

Duo said:
I can't convince you that I am right, you will have to see for yourself but trust me you will agree after living a year or two in Brussels or Paris.

Pretty patronising. How would you feel if I took your age - 21 - and said I can't convince you that I am right, but after a few more years of growing up and reforming your views you'll come round to my way of thinking?
 
Gaijin 06 said:
Why is is only France and Belgium that have these problems then? Could it be something to do with the host communities rather than the guests?

I think because they were too leniant and didn't impose stricter rules as France was forced to recently with the baning of religious symbols in public institutions, also maybe they misplaced their faith in the abilities of these communities to integrate:souka:

Gaijin 06 said:
I can't believe only Muslims hassle your girlfriend.

No, not muslims per say... yet chances are that girls in Brussels are hassled mostly by northern african youth, girls who aren't northern african and arab that is



Gaijin 06 said:
Pretty patronising. How would you feel if I took your age - 21 - and said I can't convince you that I am right, but after a few more years of growing up and reforming your views you'll come round to my way of thinking?

Eh.... was not my intention... my apoligies... :sorry:
 
Gaijin 06 said:
How would you feel if I took your age - 21 - and said I can't convince you that I am right, but after a few more years of growing up and reforming your views you'll come round to my way of thinking?
You don't live here so your point of view is different than ours.I think even after 10 years Duo would still feel the same, the same goes for me and Maciamo.This has nothing to do with being older or growing up, don't think you know more or are smarter by being older.

Gaijing 06, you said Maciamo should get of his high horse, but what you are doing is even worse.He merely gives his opinion, and doesn't criticize as much as you do !
 
It was just an illustration RockLee.

It was not an argument I chose to use, merely to demonstrate that the argument should speak for itself, and the argumenter's personal circumstances are not as important as the argument they are making
 
I know, but because we experienced things like this we are a bit biased about the fact.It's a motivation why we have this view.Everyone has his own opinion and look how he sees things, right? I don't think it's up to you to say Maciamo is wrong, cause in our eyes you are wrong.You know what I'm trying to say?
 
RockLee said:
I know, but because we experienced things like this we are a bit biased about the fact.It's a motivation why we have this view.Everyone has his own opinion and look how he sees things, right? I don't think it's up to you to say Maciamo is wrong, cause in our eyes you are wrong.You know what I'm trying to say?

I agree fully that everyone has their own motivations, views and opinions. I wouldn't have it any other way.

Both of us should have the right to hold our own opinions and form our own arguments. In your eyes I am wrong, in my eyes you are wrong. That's why I said

"I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one".
 
Gaijin 06 said:
I agree fully that everyone has their own motivations, views and opinions. I wouldn't have it any other way.

Both of us should have the right to hold our own opinions and form our own arguments. In your eyes I am wrong, in my eyes you are wrong. That's why I said

"I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one".
Then there is nothing more to be said ! :evil:
 
Gaijin 06 said:
Why is is only France and Belgium that have these problems then? Could it be something to do with the host communities rather than the guests?

I believe that the Netherlands, and maybe aslo Switzerland and Austria have similar problems, though maybe not on the same scale. I have analysed the problem many times, and however we look at it, it's particularily the North Africans that cause problems. Black Africans are squatters that know how to take advantadge of the social security system and live in cramped flats against the contract rules. But they don't cause as much trouble as Moroccans. Most North Africans in Europe live in France and Belgium, because they are French-speaking countries and Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia were former French protectorates/colonies. Maybe that's why other countries have less problems. The immigrants come from other countries.

I can't believe only Muslims hassle your girlfriend.

Yet, that is always what happens. I have always seen it dozens of times. Everytime a gang of Moroccans comes somewhere, there are troubles. One of my cousin was beaten by one such gang, and I know many other people who have had problems with them (insults in the street, vandalism, theft in cars, even carjacking).

In Belgium the Moroccans are not even the biggest group of immigrants. The Italians are. But as Duo said, other immigrants tend to be well integrated, be them Asian, Eastern European or Southern European. I don't even think that Islam itself is the problem, but rather how traditional or fundamentalist is their approach to Islam. There are also Muslims in Albania, where Duo comes from, and Turks are also Muslim - but most of the South-East European Muslims have a much more relaxed and liberal approach to Islam, and don't usually wear headscarves or veils in their own country. The Turks even produce and drink abundantly beer, wine and raki, despite Islam prohibiting alcohol consumption. In contrast, as Duo said, Moroccans in Belgium make women wear headscaves, and would usually never let a non Muslim marry their daughter, while their men go after European girls.

I also don't doubt that if religion hadn't been the "driving force" behind these wars then something else would have been. It is part of human nature, whether we like it or not.

It remains a fact that they are the ones that cause the problems. So, are you saying that North Africans are genetically more disposed to behave badly or fail to adapt to different cultures. That's closer to racism. I see the facts, and try to find the cause to it. I doubt that it is genetical. Probably more cultural - and in their case culture is heavily influenced by religion.

EDIT : maybe we should bury the hatchet and stop the argument here. ;-)
 
Back
Top