• Don't want to see ads? Install an adblocker like uBlock Origin or use a Europe-based privacy-friendly browser like Vivaldi or Mullvad.

Multiple choice; Where in Europe can Armenians and Georgians pass as natives?

Choose as many as apply; where in Europe can Armenians and Georgians fit?

  • Spain or Portugal

    Votes: 10 35.7%
  • UK or Ireland

    Votes: 2 7.1%
  • France

    Votes: 4 14.3%
  • Scandinavia

    Votes: 2 7.1%
  • Poland

    Votes: 3 10.7%
  • Belgium, Netherlands, or Luxembourg

    Votes: 2 7.1%
  • Germany, Switzerland, or Austria

    Votes: 3 10.7%
  • Ukraine

    Votes: 6 21.4%
  • Italy

    Votes: 15 53.6%
  • Sicily

    Votes: 16 57.1%
  • Greece

    Votes: 21 75.0%
  • Malta

    Votes: 11 39.3%
  • Albania

    Votes: 11 39.3%
  • Bulgaria

    Votes: 10 35.7%
  • Romania

    Votes: 12 42.9%
  • Serbia

    Votes: 13 46.4%
  • Bosnia

    Votes: 10 35.7%
  • Croatia

    Votes: 6 21.4%
  • Macedonia

    Votes: 11 39.3%
  • Cyprus

    Votes: 18 64.3%

  • Total voters
    28
Status
Not open for further replies.
Since all the data is showing Iberians as something they didn't expect, they try very hard to show things in a different way. That's what I call desperation and sickness.

Iberians have North African admixture, ok, but not in a substantial degree. No significant connection, I'm sorry.
 
I don't see any difference between Romania and Spain. But according to me people in Romania are somehow 'lighter' because of Slavic influence.

Basque people are definitely 'darker' than Georgians. Think about great sportmen like are Indurain, Gimenez but also non-Basques like Contador etc.

Unfortunately for your dreams, you are obviously not an anthropologist and you have no idea of what you are talking about. Not even Romania is lighter than Spain:

"The darkest skins occur in Portugal, southern Spain, southern Italy and Rumania." - Carleton S. Coon, "The Living Races of Man", page 63.

Notice that Spain is only partly included in this "darkest" European category, while Romania is wholly in it. So let alone Georgia, which is not even really a part of Europe.

And your absurd cherry-picking of pictures is hardly convincing. Two can play this game. Typical Georgians:

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2006-01/28/xin_200103280909645316234.jpg

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-04/09/xin_5820406100927843150093.jpg

http://crisisingeorgia.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/georgians-2.jpg
 
Frankly, I have very little trust in what Coon wrote, as he was an inveterate stereotyper and much of his information obtained second and third hand from physical anthropologists who did little field work.

Going by the body of autosomal research, on average, it is impossible for Georgians to be lighter than Spaniards, from any region of Spain.
 
Going by the body of autosomal research, on average, it is impossible for Georgians to be lighter than Spaniards, from any region of Spain.

Not only that but what they look like. Georgians look more like Iranians than Europeans and are not lighter than Spaniards.
 
You can find rare cases of people who is lighter and darker than expected, but the average is what really counts.
 
You can find rare cases of people who is lighter and darker than expected, but the average is what really counts.

true. obviously some Georgians will be lighter than some Spaniards but as a rule, Spaniards are definitely lighter.
 
Georgians

georgians.jpg
_44977228_hands_afp.jpg
xin_5820406100927843150093.jpg
0144230550085.jpg
D7F27047-D085-43EF-A9A7-02720BD72A17_w393_s.jpg
georgians-1.jpg
dominik-cagara-author-of-content.jpg
alg_georgia-protest.jpg
 
Iberians have North African admixture, ok, but not in a substantial degree. No significant connection, I'm sorry.

Iberians have a small amount of North African-specific ancestry, but North Africans themselves are not entirely of original North African stock, they're very mixed. I think the explanation for European-like North Africans is that following the Reconquista, Muslims in Iberia of native stock probably were expelled as well and settled North Africa and intermixed.
 
Iberians have a small amount of North African-specific ancestry, but North Africans themselves are not entirely of original North African stock, they're very mixed. I think the explanation for European-like North Africans is that following the Reconquista, Muslims in Iberia of native stock probably were expelled as well and settled North Africa and intermixed.

Keep in mind that the majority of North African ancestry in Iberia is very old. The ancient Berber tribes of NA were fully caucasoid and likely looked closer to the "non-mixed" Ahmazigs of Kaybels you find today, rather than everyday Moroccans / Algerians. Big difference.
 
Keep in mind that the majority of North African ancestry in Iberia is very old. The ancient Berber tribes of NA were fully caucasoid and likely looked closer to the "non-mixed" Ahmazigs of Kaybels you find today, rather than everyday Moroccans / Algerians. Big difference.

This is very true. And going with what I said I'd bet modern North Africans have more Iberian mixture, than Iberians have North African, for the reason I said.
 
Both of your observations make sense.
 
This is very true. And going with what I said I'd bet modern North Africans have more Iberian mixture, than Iberians have North African, for the reason I said.

No question.
 
Genetically how do Armenians and Georgians compare, anyone know?

According to Armenian Genetics Project among all their neighbors Armenians are farther from Georgians and are very close to Assyrians.
 
Not sure if I am correct but I notice Nordicist views here :) Let me remind you that the first real civilization in Europe belongs to Etruscans who certainly were not pale and blue-eyed :)
In general this kind of discussions are silly and vain. Usually narrow-minded fanatics from all sides hijack the issue and there is no point arguing with them...
 
I have read this before.

And I've recently watched online a lengthy presentation by Prof. Yepiskoposyan who is a main expert on Armenian DNA and he mentioned this.
 
For illustration I am going to post some photos of XIX century Georgians. Mostly they are from noble families, their genealogies are well-known so we can be certain that there was no recent admixture. Unlike of the current photos from the streets on which god knows who is depicted :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top